The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Authors

Contents

D. R. Bhat

P. B. Desai

Krishna Deva

G. S. Gai

B R. Gopal & Shrinivas Ritti

V. B. Kolte

D. G. Koparkar

K. G. Krishnan

H. K. Narasimhaswami & K. G. Krishana

K. A. Nilakanta Sastri & T. N. Subramaniam

Sadhu Ram

S. Sankaranarayanan

P. Seshadri Sastri

M. Somasekhara Sarma

D. C. Sircar

D. C. Sircar & K. G. Krishnan

D. C. Sircar & P. Seshadri Sastri

K. D. Swaminathan

N. Venkataramanayya & M. Somasekhara Sarma

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

No. 5─ THREE GRANTS FROM CHINCHANI

(3 Plates)

D. C. SIRCAR, OOTACAMUND

Two of the five copper-plate grants discovered at Chinchani in the Dahanu Taluk of the Thana District, Bombay, have been edited in the foregoing article. One of them pertains to the reign of king Indra III (915-28 A.D.) and the other to that of Kṛishṇa III (939-67 A. D.), both the rulers belonging to the Imperial Rāshṭrakūṭa dynasty of Mānyakhēṭa (Māḷkhēḍ). Of the three other copper-plate charters discovered at the same place, two were issued by a Mōḍha chief of Saṁyāna (Sanjan in the Thana District). The name of the family to which the issuer of the remaining charter from Chinchani belonged is not mentioned in the record ; but he was also a ruler of Saṁyāna and seems to have been a Mōḍha. The family name, viz. Mōḍha, associates these chiefs of Saṁyāna with the Brāhmaṇa and Bāniyā communities of the same name now residing in various parts of the Northern Konkan and its neighbourhood.[1] No ruler of this dynasty was known so far from any other source.[2] The three charters are dated respectively in Śaka 956 (1034 A.D.), Śaka 969 (1048 A.D.) and Śaka 975 (1053 A.D.). Before the inscriptions are taken up for discussion, a few words may be said about the circumstances leading to the rise of the Mōḍhas at Saṁyāna.

We have seen above[3] how an Arab governor was ruling over the territorial division of Saṁyāna on behalf of the Rāshṭrakūṭa kings Kṛishṇa II (878-915 A.D.) and Indra III (915-27 A.D.). It is well known that the Śilāhāras claimed to be the rulers of the Northern Konkan with their capital at Purī since the days of Amōghavarsha I (814-80 A.D.).[4] The founder of the Śilāhāra house was Kapardin I whose son Pullaśakti (843-44 A.D.)[5] and grandson Kapardin II (851-78 A.D.)[6] are known to have enjoyed the title ‘ lord of the Konkan ’ or ‘ lord of the entire Konkan ’ as feudatories of the said Rāshṭrakūṭa monarch. The Śilāhāra inscriptions give the names of the following rulers of the family after Kapardin II : (1) his son Vappuvanna, (2-3) Vappuvanna’s sons Jhañjha and Gōggi, and (4) Gōggi’s son Vajjaḍa I. Little is known about these rulers, although Al Mas‘udi speaks about 916 A.D. of Jhañjha as governor of the Lār (Lāṭa) country and

___________________________________________

t>

[1] See Bomb. Gaz., Vol. IX, part i, pp. 2-3, 11-12, for the Mōḍha Brāhmaṇas who are believed to have migrated to Gujarat from Upper India, and for the town of Mōḍhērā (cf. also ibid., p. 72 ; Vol. VII, pp. 608-09) which is supposed to have given the Mōḍhas their name. For the same sub-caste of the Brāhmaṇas in Kutch, Kathiawar, Poona, Rewa Kantha and Thana, see respectively Vol. V, p. 45 ; Vol. VIII, p. 146 ; Vol. XVIII, part i, p. 163 ; Vol. VI, pp. 23-24 ; and Vol. XIII, p. 80. For the Mōḍha Bāniās in Gujarat, Kutch, Kathiawar and Thana, see respectively Vol. IX, part i, p. 72 ; Vol. V, p. 50 ; Vol. VIII, p. 148 ; and Vol. XIII, p. 112.
[2] For a Mōḍha named Kuṁyara who was the son of Vaijala and a Mahākshapaṭalika of Chaulukya Bhīma II, see an inscription of V. S. 1256 in Ind. Ant., Vol. XI, p. 72, text lines 41-42. See also Sankalia, Archaeology of Gujarat, p. 208 and note 1.
[3] Cf. p. 50.
[4] Bomb. Gaz., Vol. I, part ii, pp. 538 ff. The identification of the city of Purī is not definitely settled. Different scholars have identified it variously with Ṭhāṇa (chief town of the Thana District), Ghārāpurī (Elephanta), Rājapurī in Kolaba and Rājāpur in Ratnagiri. See ibid., pp. 283-84. Some of the Śilāhāra records were issued from Sthānaka or Ṭhāṇa. It is sometimes also believed that Ṭhāṇa was the capital of the Śilāhāras while Purī was their secondary capital (Ind. Cult., Vol. II, p. 402).
[5] Ind. Ant., Vol. XIII, p. 136.
[6] Ibid., pp. 134-35.

Home Page