The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Authors

Contents

D. R. Bhat

P. B. Desai

Krishna Deva

G. S. Gai

B R. Gopal & Shrinivas Ritti

V. B. Kolte

D. G. Koparkar

K. G. Krishnan

H. K. Narasimhaswami & K. G. Krishana

K. A. Nilakanta Sastri & T. N. Subramaniam

Sadhu Ram

S. Sankaranarayanan

P. Seshadri Sastri

M. Somasekhara Sarma

D. C. Sircar

D. C. Sircar & K. G. Krishnan

D. C. Sircar & P. Seshadri Sastri

K. D. Swaminathan

N. Venkataramanayya & M. Somasekhara Sarma

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

letters and in the style of writing.’[1] This Yaśōvarman is known to have sent an embassy to the Chinese emperor in 731 A.D. and was defeated by king Lalitāditya Muktāpīḍa of Kashmir, who ruled in the period circa 726-60 A.D.[2] He seems to have died in or shortly before V.S. 811=754 A.D.[3] Yaśōvarman’s reign may thus be assigned approximately to the period 725-54 A.D. The Nalanda inscription seems to have been incised fairly early in his reign since Nalanda lay outside his own dominions in the territories of the Gauḍa king of Bengal and Bihar, whom Yaśōvarman defeated and killed sometime before his own defeat at the hands of king Lalitāditya of Kashmir about 733 A.D.[4] We may therefore assign the incision of the Nalanda inscription to a date in the period 725-33 A.D., say, to 729 A.D. If Ānandachandra’s inscription is assigned approximately to the same date, his accession may be tentatively assigned to 720 A.D. On this basis, Ānandachandra’s eight ancestors’ rule of nearly 120 years may be roughly assigned to the period 600-720 A.D. and the 230 years of Chandra rule approximately to the period 370-600 A.D. On the same basis, the rule of the individual Chandra kings may be tentatively assigned to the following periods :

t>

No. 1. Inscription of the time of Nītichandra

TEXT[5]

1 Yē dharmmā hētu-prabhavā hētu[ṁ] tēshā[ṁ] Tathāga[ta]
2 āha[6] [|*] tēshāṁ cha yō nirōdhō[7] ēvaṁ-vādi(dī) [Ma]hāśramaṇa[ḥ] [||*]
3 śrī-[Nītichandra]sya chandravat-parchhī[nāsya][8] dēvī[9]-Sāvītāṁ-.

___________________________________________________

[1] Op. cit., p. 365.
[2] See Stein, op. cit., pp. 67, 88-89.
[3] Tripathi, History of Kanauj, pp. 196-97.
[4] Ibid., pp. 204-05.
[5] From a photograph and an impression.
[6] These two letters seem to have been originally left out and later engraved in the margin.
[7] Better read nirōdha
[8] The reading and meaning of the passage are doubtful. It may be an epithet of the king in the sixth case-ending (sya) or that of the queen ending in the word āsya joined in compound with the following word. The word intended may also be prārthyamāna.


[9] Better read dēvyāḥ.

Home Page