The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Dr. Bhandarkar

J.F. Fleet

Prof. E. Hultzsch

Prof. F. Kielhorn

Rev. F. Kittel

H. Krishna Sastri

H. Luders

Vienna

V. Venkayya

Index

List of Plates

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

in A.D. 972, is the first record to present his name as Khoṭṭigadêva, with the aspirated kh.[1] This form is presented again in the Bhâdâna Śilâhâra grant of A.D. 997.[2] But the Khârêpâṭaṇ Śilâhâra grant of A.D. 1008 gives Khôṭika.[3]

Khoṭṭiga was succeeded by a nephew, who is most conveniently known as Kakka II. His Kardâ grant of A.D. 972 seems to present his proper name first, in verse, as Kakkarâja ;[4] but it is possible that we ought to find there a superscript r, imperfectly formed or damaged, and that we ought to take the name to be Karkarâja, which seems more likely to be the Sanskṛit form of it : further on, in prose, it presents it as Kakkaladêvarâja,[5] which, from the practice noted further on regarding the ending dêva, we must take to be its Prâkṛit form. The form Kakkaladêva was used in the Guṇḍûr inscription of his time, dated in A.D. 973.[6] The Bhâdâna Śilâhâra grant of A.D. 997 calls him Kakkalêśa, “ the lord Kakkala.”[7] And the Khârêpâṭaṇ Śilâhâra grant of A.D. 1008 calls him simply Kakkala, without any ending.[8] Among other later extraneous records, the Kauṭhêṁ Western Châlukya grant of A.D. 1009 gives his name as Karkara ;[9] and the Kaḷachurya inscription of A.D. 1161 at Managôḷi presents it as Kakkara.[10] His Kardâ grant of A.D. 972 gives him, in some lines in prose, containing epithets with rhyming endings, which stand just before the usual preamble of the prose passages, the birudas of Amôghavarsha, Nûtanapârtha, Ahitamârtaṇḍa, Vîranârâyana, Nṛipatuṅga, and

>

_________________________________________________________
[1] Ind. Ant. Vol. XII. p. 265, text line 25.
[2] Above, Vol. III. 272, text line 16-17.
[3] Ibid. p. 298, text line 16.
[4] Ind. Ant. Vol. XII. p. 265, text line 26.─ There is not, apparently, any such word as kakka. And the name seems to be certainly karka, ‘ white, good, excellent ; a white horse ; a crab ; the sign Cancer ;’ etc.─ The name Kakkarâja II. of the first Gujarât branch, and of his ancestor Kakkarâja I, in the grant of A.D. 757 from the Surat district ; and there, in all three passages, the first component of the name is distinctly written Kakka, without the r (Jour. Bo. Br. R. As. Soc. Vol. XVI. p. 107, text line 3, and p. 108, lines 15, 23). We meet with it next in the case of Karka or Kakka I., father of Kṛishṇa I. of the main line : the Sâmângaḍ grant of A.D. 754 gives his name as Kakkarâja (Ind. Ant. Vol. XI. p. 111, text line 9) ; the Paiṭhaṇ great of A.D. 794, however, gives it as Karkarâja in using the same verse, and again in a subsequent verse (above, Vol. III. p. 106, text lines 7, 17) ; the Baroda grant of A.D. 811 or 812, using a new verse, gives it again as Kakarâja (Ind. Ant. Vol. XII. p. 159, text line 5) ; the Ellôrâ inscription at the Daśâvatâra cave, using again a new verse, apparently gives it in the same form, Karkarâja (Archӕol. Surv. West. Ind. Vol. V. p. 88, text line 8) ; so, also, apparently do the Nausârî grant of A.D. 817 (Jour. Bo. Br. R. As. Soc. Vol. XX. pp. 142, 143, verses 5, 11) and the Kâvî grant of A.D. 826 or 827 (Ind. Ant. Vol. V. p. 146, verses 5, 11), both using the two verses of the Paiṭhaṇ grant, though the Baroda grant of A.D. 866 or 867 ; using again the same two verses, seems to give it as Kakkarâja (Ind. Ant. Vol. XII. p. 182, text lines 5, 11) ; the Bagumrâ grant, of doubtful authenticity, purporting to have been issued in A.D. 888, uses again the two verses of the Paiṭhaṇ grant, and gives it as Karkarâja (Ind. Ant. Vol. XIII. p. 66 f.. text lines 5, 10) ; and, finally, the Bhâdâna Śilâhâra grant of A.D. 997 gives it as Karkarâja, in a new verse of its own (above, Vol. III. p. 271, text line 3). And we meet with the same name again in the case of the feudatory prince Suvarṇavarsha-Karkarâja of the second Gujarât branch : the Baroda grant of A.D. 811 or 812 gives his name as Karkarâja in the verse which introduces him and in the usual preamble of the prose passages (Ind. Ant. Vol. XII. p. 160, text lines 36, 42), but seems rather to give it as Kakkarâja in the passage that purports to be his signature (ibid. p. 161, text lines 68) ; the Nausârî grant of A.D. 817 apparently gives it as Karkarâja in the verse, a new one, which introduces him, and also in the preamble of the prose passages (Jour. Bo. Br. R. As. Soc. Vol. XX. p. 139, text lines 52, 55 ; in respect of the signature, the translation shews Karkarâja, p. 148, but the text has Kakkarâja, p. 141, text line 80) ; the Kâvî grant of A.D. 826 or 827 apparently gives Karkarâja, in a new verse (Ind. Ant. Vol. V. p. 147, verse 31) ; the Baroda grant of A.D. 834 or 835 does the same (Ind. Ant. Vol. XIV. p. 199, text line 14), in reproducing the verse of the Nausârî grant of A.D. 817 ; the Bagumrâ grant of A.D. 866 or 867, using both the verse of A.D. 826 or 827 and then the verse of A.D. 817, apparently gives it, in both places, as Kakkarâja (Ind. And. Vol. XII. p. 183, text line 6) ; and the Bagumrâ grant, of doubtful authenticity, purporting to have been issued in A.D. 888, using the verse of A.D. 817, gives it as Karkarâja (Ind. Ant. Vol. XIII. p. 67, plate ii. a., text line 9).
[5] Loc. cit. p. 266, text line 47.
[6] Ind. Ant. Vol. XII. p. 271, text line 5.
[7] Above. Vol. III. p. 272, text line 18.
[8] Ibid. p. 298, text line 17.
[9] Ind. Ant. Vol. XVI. p. 23, text line 41.
[10] Above, Vol. V. p. 16, text line 12.

Home Page

>
>