The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Dr. Bhandarkar

J.F. Fleet

Prof. E. Hultzsch

Prof. F. Kielhorn

Rev. F. Kittel

H. Krishna Sastri

H. Luders

Vienna

V. Venkayya

Index

List of Plates

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

51.─ In the Śvêtâraṇyêśvara temple at Tiruveṇgâḍu.[1]

1 Svasti śrîḥ [||*] Tribuvanachchakkaravattigaḷ śrî-Râjarâjadêvarkku yâṇḍu 22 vadu Mîna-nâyarru apara-pakkattu śa[d]u[r*]tthiy[u]m Śe[v*]v[ây]- kkilamaiy[u]m perra Uttiraṭṭâdi-nâḷ.

In the 22nd year (of the reign) of the emperor of the three worlds, the glorious Râjarâjadêva,─ on the day of Uttara-Bhadrapadâ, which corresponded to a Tuesday and to the fourth tithi of the second fortnight of the month of Mîna.”

This date, in the month of Mîna of the 22nd year of the king’s reign, would be expected to fall in A.D. 1238, in Śaka-Saṁvat 1159 expired, and it undoubtedly does so ; but the wording of the date is intrinsically wrong because, in the month of Mîna, the nakshatra can never be Uttara-Bhadrapadâ on the 4th tithi of the dark fortnight. What suggests itself at once is that the fourth tithi has been quoted wrongly instead of the fourteenth ; and for this tithi the date is correct. In Śaka-Saṁvat 1159 expired the 14th tithi of the dark fortnight in the month of Mîna ended 21 h. 37 m. after mean sunrise of Tuesday, the 16th March A.D. 1238, when the nakshatra was Uttara-Bhadrapadâ, by the Brahma-siddhânta and according to Garga during the whole of the day, and by the equal space system from 9 h. 51 m. after mean sunrise. I feel certain that this is the proper equivalent of the date.

52.─ In the Râjagôpâla-Perumâḷ temple at Mannârguḍi.[2]

1 Svasti śrîḥ [||*] Tribhuvana[chcha]k[karava]ttigaḷ [śrî]-Râjarâjadêvar[kku yâṇ]ḍu [i]rubattiraṇ[ḍ]âvadi[n] edir=âm=âṇḍu [3]Minan-nâyarru [a]para-paksha[t]tu navam[i]yum Tiṅgaḷ-kilamaiyum perra Pûr[âḍa]ttu [nâ]ḷ.

“ In the year which was opposite the twenty-second year (of the reign) of the emperor of the three worlds, the glorious Râjarâjadêva,─ on the day of Pûrvâshâḍhâ, which corresponded to a Monday and to the ninth tithi of the second fortnight of the month of Mîna.”

>

The year opposite the 22nd year of this date and of the two following dates was the 23rd year of the king’s reign, and the three dates, being all of the month of Mîna, will therefore be expected to fall in A.D. 1239, in Śaka-Saṁvat 1160 expired. In this year the 9th tithi of the dark fortnight in the month of Mîna entirely occupied[4] Monday, the 28th February A.D. 1239, when the nakshatra was Pûrvâshâḍhâ, by the equal space system the whole day, by the Brahma-siddhânta for 11 h. 10 m., and according to Garga for 16 h. 25 m., after mean sunrise.

53.─ In the Kailâsanâtha temple at Mannârguḍi.[5]

1 Svast[i] śr[î] [||*] Tr[i]bhuva[na]chchakkaravattigaḷ śrî-Râjarâ[ja]dêvarkku yâṇḍu i[rubat*]tiraṇḍâva[di]n edir=âṁ=âṇḍu Mi(mî)na-nâya[r]ru apara-pa[kshatt]u da[śam]i[yum] Budan-kila[maiyum] p[e]rra Uttirâḍa[t*]tu nâḷ

“ In the year which was opposite the twenty-second year (of the reign) of the emperor of the three worlds, the glorious Râjarâjadêva,─ on the day of Uttarâshâḍhâ, which corresponded to a Wednesday and to the tenth tithi of the second fortnight of the month of Mîna.”

______________________________________________________________
[1] No. 119 of the Government Epigraphist’s collection for 1896.
[2] No. 104 of the Government Epigraphist’s collection for 1897.
[3] Read Mîna-.
[4] It commenced 38 m. before mean sunrise of the Monday and ended 1 h. 12 m. after mean sunrise of the following Tuesday, and would therefore be properly described (for the Monday) as prâthama-navamî.
[5] No. 99 of the Government Epigraphist’s collection for 1897.

Home Page

>
>