The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions And Corrections

Images

Miscellaneous Inscriptions

Texts And Translations

Inscriptions of The Kalachuris of Sarayupara

Inscriptions of The Kalachuris of Ratanpur

Inscriptions of The Kalachuris of Raipur

Additional Inscriptions

Appendix

Supplementary Inscriptions

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

INSCRIPTIONS OF THE KALACHURIS OF RATANPUR

NO. 98 ; PLATE LXXX
SHEORINARAYAN STONE INSCRIPTION OF JAJALLADEVA II : CHEDI YEAR 919

THE stone which bears this inscription is built into the plinth of the temple of Chandra-chūḍēśvara which stands in close vicinity to that of Nārāyaṇa in Shēorinārāyaṇ, a well-known place of pilgrimage on the left bank of the Mahānadī, 38 miles south-east of Bilaspur in the Jānjgir tahsil of the Bilaspur District in Madhya Pradesh. The date of the inscription has been known for a long time from a photozincograph published in Sir A. Cunningham's Archæological Survey of India Reports, Vol. XVII, plate xx. A brief and somewhat imperfect account of it was published by Dr. D. R. Bhandarkar in the Progress Report of the Archæological Survey of Western India for 1903-04, pp. 52-53, which has been followed by Rai Bahadur Hiralal in his Inscriptions in the C. P. and Berar.¹ The inscription is edited here for the first time from the original stone which I examined in situ and from estampages taken under my direction.

The inscription contains 27 lines. The writing covers a space 3' 5” broad and 1' 8½” high, but nearly half the portion on the proper left in 11. 2-17 has been completely lost owing to the peeling off of the surface of the stone. The Mahant of Shēorinārāyaṇ possesses a sort of transcript of the inscription which was made when the stone was less damaged, but it is too full of mistakes to be of any use in the restoration of the lost portion. The letters are well-formed, carefully written and deeply incised. Their size varies from .3” to .5”. In two places the aksharas which were at first omitted are written below the line; see ya in prīṇayatō=, 1. 15 and gān in =bhōgān, 1.20 ; and in one place a wrong akshara is cancelled by incising two vertical strokes on the top. The characters are Nāgarī. They closely resemble those of the Ratnapur inscription of Pṛithvēva II, dated K. 915,² except that ṅ appears here with a dot in some places. (e. g., in Kaliṅgarājō, 1.4 ) and without it in others (e. g., in -bhṛiṅg-āṅganā-, 1.23). The language is Sanskrit. Except for the obeisance to Śiva in the first line and the date and the customary pious wish for the well-being of the world in the last, the record is metrically composed throughout. It contains 45 verses, all of which are numbered. The orthography shows the usual peculiarities of the use of v for b and the confusion of the dental s and the palatal ś. In śrēyānsi 1.1, the anusvāra is wrongly changed to n, and in pancha 1. 3 and Virinch-ānana- 1.26, nch wrongly takes the place of ñch.

t>

The praśasti was composed as well as written by Kumārapāla. Who describes himself as an excellent Kshatriya and a descendant of Sahasrārjuna. He figures as scribe in some other inscriptions³ also. The engraver was Chhītuka by name.

The present record is dated in the Chēdi year 919 (expressed in decimal figures only). The date does not admit of verification for want of the necessary details, but the year, if expired, would correspond to 1167-68 A. C.

The inscription belongs to the reign of Jājalladēva II of the Kalachuri Dynasty of Ratanpur. The immediate object of it seems to be to record the donation of the village Chiñchēlī by Āmaṇadēva, a descendant of a collateral branch of the Kalachuri dynasty, for the purpose of defraying the expenses of incense, lights and other materials for the worship of the god Chandrachūḍa and the erection of a temple of Durgā in front of the shrine (of
____________________

1 Second ed., p. 122.
2 Above, No. 96.
3 Viz., The Ratanpur stone inscription of Pṛithvīdēva II, V. 1207 (above, No. 93), the Ratanpur stone inscription of Pṛithvīdēva II, K. 915 (above, No. 96) and the Kharōd stone inscription of Ratnadēva III (below, No. 100).

 

  Home Page