The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions And Corrections

Images

Miscellaneous Inscriptions

Texts And Translations

Inscriptions of The Kalachuris of Sarayupara

Inscriptions of The Kalachuris of Ratanpur

Inscriptions of The Kalachuris of Raipur

Additional Inscriptions

Appendix

Supplementary Inscriptions

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

INSCRIPTIONS OF THE KALACHURIS OF RATANPUR

KOSGAIN STONE INSCRIPTION (No. 1) OF VAHARA

The inscription is not dated,¹ but from the other inscription on the same stone,² which belongs to the same reign and is dated in the Vikrama year 1570, as well as from the Ratanpur inscription³dated in the Vikrama year 1552, which mentions the artisans Chhītaku and Māṇḍana, it is clear that Vāharēndra flourished at the end of the fifteenth and in the beginning of the sixteenth century A. C.

There are only two places mentioned in the present record. Of them, Ratnapura, already identified, was for a long time the capital of the Kalachuris in Chhattisgarh, through at the time of the present praśasti the seat of the government seems to have been shifted to the fort of Kosgain in the hilly tract to the north-east, probably on account of Muslim invasions. Kōsaṅga is evidently the fort of Kosgain in the former Chhuri Zamindārī, where the inscribed stone was originally discovered.4

t>

images/559

1 According to Hiralal, the inscription was dated, but has broken off exactly where the year was given. This does not appear to be correct. The date, if the inscription contained one, should have come at the end as in No. 106 below, and there the record is fairly well preserved.
2 Below, No. 106.
3 Above, No. 104.
4 Mr. Beglar's supposition that the stone was brought from elsewhere, because it is inscribed on both the sides (C. A. S. I. R., Vol. XIII, p. 157) is thus untenable.
5 From the original stone and inked estampages.
6 The correct reading would be - रजा अभवदेहो
7 Perhaps विस्तृतेis intended.
8 Read मतिमनुसरल्लैम्बोदर:. This would not, however, suit the metre.
9 Metre of verses 1-5 : Śārdūlavikrīḍita.
10 The missing aksharas may have been मज्जनं
11 Originally तस्येय- altered to तस्येद-
12 The lower part of the first akshara of this personal name is broken off. The second akshara is exactly like of घ in 11. 5 and 10 of No. 106, below. Hiralal's reading घाटम धीर cannot, therefore, be accepted.
13 Metre of this and the next verse: Anushṭubh.

 

  Home Page