The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions And Corrections

Images

Miscellaneous Inscriptions

Texts And Translations

Inscriptions of The Kalachuris of Sarayupara

Inscriptions of The Kalachuris of Ratanpur

Inscriptions of The Kalachuris of Raipur

Additional Inscriptions

Appendix

Supplementary Inscriptions

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

INSCRIPTIONS OF THE KALACHURIS OF RATANPUR

KUGDA STONE INSCRIPTION OF PRITHVIDEVA II : YEAR 893

know from other records to be the queen of Jajalladeva I. The name of Ratnadeva (II), the son and successor of Jajalladeva I, is partially preserved at the end of line 3. Vallabharaja is mentioned in line 7. His exploits and charity, the town he settled and the lake he excavated appear to have been described in lines 8-19. The next four lines are completely effaced. It is not, therefore, possible to say what the present inscription was intended to record

The inscription is dated in the year 893 (expressed in decimal figures only) without further specification of the month, fortnight or tithi. The date does not, therefore, admit of verification. But the chief interest of it lies in this that it expressly refers itself to the Kalachuri era and to the reign of the illustrious king Pṛithvīdēva. The year 893, if expired, would correspond to 1141-42 A.C. Pṛithvīdēva, during whose reign the inscription was put up, was evidently Pṛithvīdēva II of the Kalachuri Dynasty of Ratanpur.

t>

images/447

1 From ink impressions.
2 One verse of the Anushṭubh metre is lost in the beginning.
3 See 1.2 of the Raipur Museum inscription (No. 85, above.)
4 The last four aksharas may have been जाजल्ल्देव: | Metre: Mālinī.
5 Metre: Upajāti.
6 The aksharas in the brackets are taken from the Raipur Museum inscription.
7 Metre of this and the following verse: Śārdūlavīkrīḍita.
8 Metre: Anushṭubh. The lost verse may have been identical with तस्य पूर्व्वजराजानां etc., in 1. 4 of the Raipur Museum inscription.
9 See 1.6 of the Raipur Museum inscription. Metre: Mālinī.
10 See 1.7 of the Raipur Museum inscription. Metre of this and the next verse: Vasantatilakā
11 See 1.7 of the Raipur Museum inscription.
12 The aksharas in brackets are supplied from the Akaltarā inscription (No. 84, above).

 

  Home Page