The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Chaudhury, P.D.

Chhabra, B.ch.

DE, S. C.

Desai, P. B.

Dikshit, M. G.

Krishnan, K. G.

Desai, P. B

Krishna Rao, B. V.

Lakshminarayan Rao, N., M.A.

Mirashi, V. V.

Narasimhaswami, H. K.

Pandeya, L. P.,

Sircar, D. C.

Venkataramayya, M., M.A.,

Venkataramanayya, N., M.A.

Index-By A. N. Lahiri

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

The present grant describes both Allaśakti and Jayaśakti as samadhigata-pañcha-mahā-śabda, i.e., as having attained the right to the five great sounds. They both were evidently subordinate chiefs, owing allegiance to the Chālukya Emperor of Bādāmi. Bhānuśakti, though described in a more grandiloquent style, probably enjoyed no better status.[1] As his grandson Allaśakti was flourishing in 653 and 656 A.C., Bhānuśakti may be referred to the first quarter of the seventh century A.C. He was probably placed in charge of Gujarat and Khandesh by Pulakēśin II after he had conquered these provinces from the Kalachuris. No records of the reigns of Bhānuśakti and Ādityaśakti have yet been discovered, but Allaśakti is known to have made three grants, two of which, recorded in the Kāsārē and Bagumrā plates, are dated in the Kalachuri era and one, viz., that in the Nāgad plates, in the Śaka era. The earliest of these, viz., that in the Kāsārē plates is dated K. 404 (653 A.C.) and registers the donation of some land in the village Pippalikhēṭa, modern Pimpalner in West Khandesh. The second, known as the Bagumrā plates, dated K. 406 (656 A.C.), registers the gift of the village Balisa, modern Wanesa near Tēn in South Gujarat. The third record, viz., the Nāgad plates, though issued from Kāyāvatāra, modern Kārwān in Gujarat, mentions the grant of a village in the vishaya of the Nāndīpuradvārī which is probably identical with Nandurbār in West Khandesh. This grant is dated in Śaka 577 (655-56 A.C.). These records show that Allaśakti continued to hold Gujarat and Khandesh at least till 656 A.C. Sometime thereafter, he seems to have lost Gujarat ; for the next date from that part of the country is K. 421 (671 A.C.), furnished by the Surat plates of Śryāśraya-Śīlāditya, which register the grant of the village Āsaṭṭigrāma, modern Astgaon, not far from Tēn. From the Mānōr plates,[2] recently published by Mr. Krishna Deva, we learn that Dharāśraya-Jayasiṁha, the younger brother of the Chālukya emperor Vikramāditya I, founded the Navsāri branch in 669-70 A.C. Thereafter, the rule of the Sēndrakas seems to have been confined to Khandesh. As shown below, the places mentioned in the present Mundakhēḍē plates can be satisfactorily located near the western border of that district.

>

It may be noted that Bhānuśakti, Allaśakti and Jayaśakti bore certain birudas which are usually associated with their Chālukya suzerains. One of these deserves special notice. Jayaśakti calls himself Vikramāditya in the present grant, dated 681 A.C. His suzerain was Vikramāditya I, who had died just in the preceding year (680 A.C.). As this is the only known grant of Jayaśakti, we do not know whether Jayaśakti had borne the biruda previously or whether he assumed it only after the death of Vikramāditya. The absence of any reference to the imperial family in the present grant lends colour to the latter view,[3] but we may note that similar birudas were assumed by other feudatories of the Early Chālukyas. The Mānōr plates, for instance, show that Maṅgalarasa, the son of Dharāśraya-Jayasiṁha, had assumed the biruda Vinayāditya before Śaka 613 (691 A.C.) during the reign of the Chālukya emperor Vinayāditya. The present grant does not, therefore, give any indication that Jayaśakti had thrown off the yoke of the Early Chālukyas.

No descendants of Jayaśakti are known but, as I have suggested elsewhere[4], the Sinda kings who flourished in Khandesh in the 10th century A.C. may have belonged to the same lineage. Like the Sēndrakas, they also claimed to have descended from the lord of serpents. Later, a family called Nikumbha is known to have flourished in the Khandesh District. It is known from the

_________________________________________________

[1] Chandorkar’s view that the Sēndrakas were independent kings who helped the Early Chālukyas to establish themselves in the Kanarese country is not supported by any evidence.
[2] Above, Vol. XXVIII, p. 18.
[3] Dr. Fleet also inferred that the Bagumrā plates belong to the period when the Western Chālukya sovereignty was in abeyance. See Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts, Bom. Gaz., Vol. I, Part II, p. 361. Since then we have known of several records of the feudatories of the Western Chālukyas which make no mention of the reigning emperor.
[4] Above, Vol. XXV, pp. 166 ff.

Home Page

>
>