Contents |
Index
|
Introduction
|
Contents
|
List of Plates
|
Additions and Corrections
|
Images
|
Contents |
Chaudhury, P.D.
|
Chhabra, B.ch.
|
DE, S. C.
|
Desai, P. B.
|
Dikshit, M. G.
|
Krishnan, K. G.
|
Desai, P. B
|
Krishna Rao, B. V.
|
Lakshminarayan Rao, N., M.A.
|
Mirashi, V. V.
|
Narasimhaswami, H. K.
|
Pandeya, L. P.,
|
Sircar, D. C.
|
Venkataramayya, M., M.A.,
|
Venkataramanayya, N., M.A.
|
Index-By A. N. Lahiri
|
Other
South-Indian Inscriptions
|
Volume
1
|
Volume
2
|
Volume
3
|
Vol.
4 - 8
|
Volume 9
|
Volume 10
|
Volume 11
|
Volume 12
|
Volume 13
|
Volume
14
|
Volume 15
|
Volume 16
|
Volume 17
|
Volume 18
|
Volume
19
|
Volume
20
|
Volume 22 Part 1
|
Volume
22 Part 2
|
Volume
23
|
Volume
24 |
Volume
26
|
Volume 27 |
Tiruvarur
|
Darasuram
|
Konerirajapuram
|
Tanjavur |
Annual Reports 1935-1944
|
Annual Reports 1945- 1947
|
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2
|
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3
|
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1
|
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2
|
Epigraphica Indica
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 3
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 4
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 6
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 7
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 8
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 27
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 29
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 30
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 31
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 32
|
Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2
|
Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2
|
Vākāṭakas Volume 5
|
Early Gupta Inscriptions
|
Archaeological
Links
|
Archaeological-Survey
of India
|
Pudukkottai
|
|
|
EPIGRAPHIA INDICA
The present grant describes both Allaśakti and Jayaśakti as samadhigata-pañcha-mahā-śabda,
i.e., as having attained the right to the five great sounds. They both were evidently subordinate
chiefs, owing allegiance to the Chālukya Emperor of Bādāmi. Bhānuśakti, though described
in a more grandiloquent style, probably enjoyed no better status.[1] As his grandson Allaśakti
was flourishing in 653 and 656 A.C., Bhānuśakti may be referred to the first quarter of the seventh
century A.C. He was probably placed in charge of Gujarat and Khandesh by Pulakēśin II after
he had conquered these provinces from the Kalachuris. No records of the reigns of Bhānuśakti
and Ādityaśakti have yet been discovered, but Allaśakti is known to have made three grants, two
of which, recorded in the Kāsārē and Bagumrā plates, are dated in the Kalachuri era and one, viz.,
that in the Nāgad plates, in the Śaka era. The earliest of these, viz., that in the Kāsārē plates
is dated K. 404 (653 A.C.) and registers the donation of some land in the village Pippalikhēṭa,
modern Pimpalner in West Khandesh. The second, known as the Bagumrā plates, dated K. 406
(656 A.C.), registers the gift of the village Balisa, modern Wanesa near Tēn in South Gujarat.
The third record, viz., the Nāgad plates, though issued from Kāyāvatāra, modern Kārwān in Gujarat, mentions the grant of a village in the vishaya of the Nāndīpuradvārī which is probably identical
with Nandurbār in West Khandesh. This grant is dated in Śaka 577 (655-56 A.C.). These records
show that Allaśakti continued to hold Gujarat and Khandesh at least till 656 A.C. Sometime thereafter, he seems to have lost Gujarat ; for the next date from that part of the country is K. 421 (671
A.C.), furnished by the Surat plates of Śryāśraya-Śīlāditya, which register the grant of the village
Āsaṭṭigrāma, modern Astgaon, not far from Tēn. From the Mānōr plates,[2] recently published by
Mr. Krishna Deva, we learn that Dharāśraya-Jayasiṁha, the younger brother of the Chālukya
emperor Vikramāditya I, founded the Navsāri branch in 669-70 A.C. Thereafter, the rule of
the Sēndrakas seems to have been confined to Khandesh. As shown below, the places mentioned
in the present Mundakhēḍē plates can be satisfactorily located near the western border of that
district.
It may be noted that Bhānuśakti, Allaśakti and Jayaśakti bore certain birudas which are
usually associated with their Chālukya suzerains. One of these deserves special notice. Jayaśakti
calls himself Vikramāditya in the present grant, dated 681 A.C. His suzerain was Vikramāditya I,
who had died just in the preceding year (680 A.C.). As this is the only known grant of Jayaśakti,
we do not know whether Jayaśakti had borne the biruda previously or whether he assumed it
only after the death of Vikramāditya. The absence of any reference to the imperial family in the present grant lends colour to the latter view,[3] but we may note that similar birudas were assumed by
other feudatories of the Early Chālukyas. The Mānōr plates, for instance, show that Maṅgalarasa,
the son of Dharāśraya-Jayasiṁha, had assumed the biruda Vinayāditya before Śaka 613 (691 A.C.)
during the reign of the Chālukya emperor Vinayāditya. The present grant does not, therefore,
give any indication that Jayaśakti had thrown off the yoke of the Early Chālukyas.
No descendants of Jayaśakti are known but, as I have suggested elsewhere[4], the Sinda kings
who flourished in Khandesh in the 10th century A.C. may have belonged to the same lineage. Like
the Sēndrakas, they also claimed to have descended from the lord of serpents. Later, a family
called Nikumbha is known to have flourished in the Khandesh District. It is known from the
_________________________________________________
[1] Chandorkar’s view that the Sēndrakas were independent kings who helped the Early Chālukyas to establish
themselves in the Kanarese country is not supported by any evidence.
[2] Above, Vol. XXVIII, p. 18.
[3] Dr. Fleet also inferred that the Bagumrā plates belong to the period when the Western Chālukya sovereignty
was in abeyance. See Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts, Bom. Gaz., Vol. I, Part II, p. 361. Since then we have
known of several records of the feudatories of the Western Chālukyas which make no mention of the reigning
emperor.
[4] Above, Vol. XXV, pp. 166 ff.
|