Contents |
Index
|
Introduction
|
Contents
|
List of Plates
|
Additions and Corrections
|
Images
|
Contents |
Chaudhury, P.D.
|
Chhabra, B.ch.
|
DE, S. C.
|
Desai, P. B.
|
Dikshit, M. G.
|
Krishnan, K. G.
|
Desai, P. B
|
Krishna Rao, B. V.
|
Lakshminarayan Rao, N., M.A.
|
Mirashi, V. V.
|
Narasimhaswami, H. K.
|
Pandeya, L. P.,
|
Sircar, D. C.
|
Venkataramayya, M., M.A.,
|
Venkataramanayya, N., M.A.
|
Index-By A. N. Lahiri
|
Other
South-Indian Inscriptions
|
Volume
1
|
Volume
2
|
Volume
3
|
Vol.
4 - 8
|
Volume 9
|
Volume 10
|
Volume 11
|
Volume 12
|
Volume 13
|
Volume
14
|
Volume 15
|
Volume 16
|
Volume 17
|
Volume 18
|
Volume
19
|
Volume
20
|
Volume 22 Part 1
|
Volume
22 Part 2
|
Volume
23
|
Volume
24 |
Volume
26
|
Volume 27 |
Tiruvarur
|
Darasuram
|
Konerirajapuram
|
Tanjavur |
Annual Reports 1935-1944
|
Annual Reports 1945- 1947
|
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2
|
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3
|
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1
|
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2
|
Epigraphica Indica
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 3
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 4
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 6
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 7
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 8
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 27
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 29
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 30
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 31
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 32
|
Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2
|
Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2
|
Vākāṭakas Volume 5
|
Early Gupta Inscriptions
|
Archaeological
Links
|
Archaeological-Survey
of India
|
Pudukkottai
|
|
|
EPIGRAPHIA INDICA
SANTIRAGRAMA GRANT OF DANDIMAHADEVI
The charter records the grant of the village called Sāntīragrāma together with another locality
called Kōmyōsaṅga, situated in the Pachhama (Paśchima) khaṇḍa within the Tamura vishaya
in the Dakshiṇa-Tōsalā (i.e., ºTōsalī) country. The grant was made by the Paramamāhēśvarī
(devout worshipper of Mahēśvara or Śiva) Daṇḍimahādēvī, who is endowed with imperial titles,
in favour of Bhāṭṭa Mākyadēva (possibly Bhaṭṭa Māṇikyadēva), who was the son of Jālladēva and
grandson of Purushōttama. The donee was an inhabitant of Dharmapāṭṭi ; but his family had
originally hailed from Ṭakārī. He belonged to the Bhāradvāja gōtra, to the Āṅgirasa, Bārhaspatya
and Bhāradvāja pravaras and to the Vājasanēya charaṇa and was a student of the Mādhyandina
śākhā. The occasion of the grant was a solar eclipse. It was made at the request of Paramamāhēśvara Rāṇaka śrībhṛid-Apsarōdēva who was the lord of the Yamagartā maṇḍala. It seems
that Apsarōdēva was a feudatory of Daṇḍimahādēvī and that the Yamagartā maṇḍala formed a
part of the Bhauma-Kara dominions. We have seen that the kings of this family granted lands in
northern and southern Tōsalī, the former indicating the Balasore-Cuttack region (sometimes with
a part of the Midnapur District of West Bengal) and the latter including parts of the Cuttack, Puri
and Ganjam Districts. Kōṅgōda about the border between the Puri and Ganjam Districts is said
to have been included in Dakshiṇa-Tōsalī. The Tuṅga chiefs Gayāḍatuṅga and Vinītatuṅga,
whose charters have been discovered in Talcher and Bonai, also called themselves lords of the
Yamagartā maṇḍala.[1] In this connection it may also be pointed out that the Tuṅga ruler Vinītatuṅga seems to be mentioned as a feudatory of the Bhauma-Kara monarch Śivakara III, grandfather of Daṇḍimahādēvī, in both of his Talcher plates dated in the year 149.[2] An earlier ruler
of the Yamagartā maṇḍala was Jayasiṁha who also used the era employed by the Bhauma-Karas
in dating their records and was very probably one of their feudatories. The date of the Dhenkanal
plate[3] of Jayasiṁha is read as the year 88, although the actual reading may be 128. It seems therefore that the Yamagartā maṇḍala was situated in the valley of the river Brāhmaṇī to the west
and south-west of the territories of the Bhañja chiefs of Khiñjalī-maṇḍala (in the Baud-Keonjhar
area) and of Khijjiṅga-kōṭṭa (in the Mayurbhanj region). It appears further that like the chiefs
of Yamagarṭā, the Bhañjas also originally acknowledgedthe supremacy of the Bhauma-Karas.
The Tuṅgas of Yamagartā were probably succeeded by the dynasty represented by Apsarōdēva ;
but, sometime afterwards, the latter seems to have been itself ousted by rulers of the Śulkī dynasty,
whose names ended with the word stambha.
The record contains two lists of officials to whom the royal order was addressed. Both of these
are short but contain a few interesting entries. The first list mentioned in connection with the
country of Dakshiṇa-Tōsalā, includes Mahāsāmanta, Rājasatka, Rājaputra, Kumārāmātya, Auparika
(Uparika), Vishayapati, Tadāyuktaka, Dāṇḍapāśika and Sthānāntarika. In place of Rājasatka,
other records of the queen read Antaraṅga, probably indicating the royal physician. Rājasatka
may also indicate the same office. Kumārāmātya seems to be an Amātya or executive officer of the
status of a prince of the royal blood. Uparika was a viceroy and Vishayapati the ruler of a district.
Tadāyuktaka was probably the ruler of a subdivision of the district, appointed by the Vishayapati
and not by the crown. Dāṇḍapāśika was a police officer, its corruption Daṇḍuāsi still indicating a
village-watchman in Orissa. The Sthānāntarikas were probably spies. The other list of officials,
possibly belonging to the territorial unit called the Pachhama (Paśchima) khaṇḍa in the Tamura
vishaya, includes Mahāmahattara, Bṛihadbhōgin, Pustakapāla and Kūṭakōlasa, to whose adhikaraṇas or offices the royal order is addressed. Mahattara means the headman of a village. Bhōgin
_________________________________________________
[1] Bhandarkar, List, Nos. 1745-47.
[2] B. Misra, op. cit., pp. 40-51.
[3] Vide JBORS, Vol. II, pp. 417 ff. ; Bhandarkar, List, No. 1756.
|