Contents |
Index
|
Introduction
|
Contents
|
List of Plates
|
Additions and Corrections
|
Images
|
Contents |
Chaudhury, P.D.
|
Chhabra, B.ch.
|
DE, S. C.
|
Desai, P. B.
|
Dikshit, M. G.
|
Krishnan, K. G.
|
Desai, P. B
|
Krishna Rao, B. V.
|
Lakshminarayan Rao, N., M.A.
|
Mirashi, V. V.
|
Narasimhaswami, H. K.
|
Pandeya, L. P.,
|
Sircar, D. C.
|
Venkataramayya, M., M.A.,
|
Venkataramanayya, N., M.A.
|
Index-By A. N. Lahiri
|
Other
South-Indian Inscriptions
|
Volume
1
|
Volume
2
|
Volume
3
|
Vol.
4 - 8
|
Volume 9
|
Volume 10
|
Volume 11
|
Volume 12
|
Volume 13
|
Volume
14
|
Volume 15
|
Volume 16
|
Volume 17
|
Volume 18
|
Volume
19
|
Volume
20
|
Volume 22 Part 1
|
Volume
22 Part 2
|
Volume
23
|
Volume
24 |
Volume
26
|
Volume 27 |
Tiruvarur
|
Darasuram
|
Konerirajapuram
|
Tanjavur |
Annual Reports 1935-1944
|
Annual Reports 1945- 1947
|
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2
|
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3
|
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1
|
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2
|
Epigraphica Indica
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 3
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 4
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 6
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 7
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 8
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 27
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 29
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 30
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 31
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 32
|
Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2
|
Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2
|
Vākāṭakas Volume 5
|
Early Gupta Inscriptions
|
Archaeological
Links
|
Archaeological-Survey
of India
|
Pudukkottai
|
|
|
EPIGRAPHIA INDICA
the same order as in the Hindol plate of Kulastambha, son of Jayastambha and grandson of Raṇastambha. But the language of the verses in our document is slightly different from that of the Hindol plate. Moreover, the important verse referring to the son of Raṇastambha and father of the
reigning king Kulastambha is defective inasmuch as the foot containing the name of Jayastambha
as found in the Hindol plate is omitted in the record under review no doubt through the inadvertence of the writer. There is, however, little doubt that Kulastambha who issued the charter under
discussion as well as the other Puri (Rāghavadāsa Maṭha) plate published by Chakravarti was no
other than the issuer of the Hindol plate.
Another interesting fact worth noticed in this connection is that the text of the introductory
part in our record closely follows that in the Bhimnagarigarh (Dhenkanal) plate of Kulastambha,1
although, where this latter mentions Vikramāditya and his son Raṇastambha, the present record
mentions Raṇastambha and his son (name omitted through negligence of the scribe, but known from
the Hindol plate to have been Jayastambha). The Bhimnagarigarh plate represents its issuer,
king Kulastambha, as the lord of all the Gōndramas with Śaṅkhajōṭī forming the borderland of
his kingdom exactly as in the record under notice. Since the relation of Kulastambha, referred to
as issuing the charter, with Raṇastambha mentioned in the introductory part is not specified clearly
in the inscription, the Bhimnagarigarh plate is generally believed to have been issued by Raṇastambha who is suggested to have had Kulastambha as a second name. But we have elsewhere2
remarked, “ The Bhimnagarigarh plate represents Mahārāja Raṇastambha as the ātmaja (line 10) of
Vikramāditya. The word suta (line 12) again used before the following mention of Kulastambha may
suggest that the record in question belongs not to Raṇastambha-Kulastambha but actually to a
Kulastambha who was the son of Raṇastambha”. The close resemblance of the Bhimnagarigarh
inscription with the record under discussion in regard to both language and style, however, now
appears to suggest that the corrupt introduction of the former epigraph actually intended to
describe, as that of the present charter, Kulastambha, grandson of Raṇastambha. It further
appears that the text of the introductory part of the Bhimnagarigarh plate was copied without
proper adjustment from a grant of Jayastambha.3
Verse 1 our inscription, found in most of the Śulkī records, is in adoration to the god Giriśa,
i.e. Śiva, while verses 2-3 introduce king Raṇastambha of the Śulkī family, favoured by the goddess
Stambhēśvarī, as having constructed some temples probably for the god Sadāśiva. Verses 4-5
describe Raṇastambha’s son whose name is inadvertently omitted, while the following two verses
(verses 6-7) described the reigning king Kulastambha, son of Raṇastambha’s son, as issuing the charter in question from Kōdālōka.
The grant portion of the document which is in prose and follows the introduction in verses represents Mahārāja Kulastambha, called lord of all the Gōndramas, as in good health. A defective
passage in the description of the ruler seems to attribute to him the feudatory title samadhigatapañchamahāśabda, although the change introduce in it may have been deliberate. Such deliberate modification of feudatory titles was often resorted to by subordinate rulers who claimed a
semi-independent political status.4 The future rulers and the present and future administrators,
associated with the maṇḍala (district) extending up to the Śaṅkhajōṭikā, are then addressed. The
way in which the maṇḍala is mentioned suggests that it comprised either the whole dominions of
the Śulkīs or, at least, the central part of the Śulkī territories. The lists of the rulers and administrators include the rājanaka, rājaputra, mahāsāmanta, vishayapati and others. The charter then
_________________________________________________
[1] JBORS, Vol. II, pp. 401 ff.
[2] Above, Vol. XXVIII, p. 109.
[3] Cf. the text of the Dhenkanal plate of Jayastambha in JBORS, Vol. II, pp. 406 ff.
[4] Cf. the Mahada plates (above, Vol. XXVIII, pp. 283 ff.).
|