The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Chaudhury, P.D.

Chhabra, B.ch.

DE, S. C.

Desai, P. B.

Dikshit, M. G.

Krishnan, K. G.

Desai, P. B

Krishna Rao, B. V.

Lakshminarayan Rao, N., M.A.

Mirashi, V. V.

Narasimhaswami, H. K.

Pandeya, L. P.,

Sircar, D. C.

Venkataramayya, M., M.A.,

Venkataramanayya, N., M.A.

Index-By A. N. Lahiri

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

KALIDINDI GRANT OF EASTERN CHALUKYA RAJARAJA I

The text of the present inscription falls into four divisions : I. the genealogical account of the Eastern Chāḷukyas up to Rājarāja I ; II. the narration of the circumstances in which the grant was made ; III. the description of the boundaries of the village which is the subject of the present grant, and IV. the imprecatory verses together perhaps with the names of the author of the praśasti and the scribe.

>

I . This part further divides itself two sub-sections :─(a) legendary, and (b) historical.

(a) The legendary genealogy opens with Nārāyaṇa, Brahmā, Atri, Chandra, etc., and proceeds without a break up to Udayana, the son of Śatānīka. Then comes a hiatus which the composer of the genealogy bridges up with fifty-nine nameless kings who are said to have ruled at Ayōdhyā. The sixtieth, Vijayāditya by name, migrated to Dakshiṇāpatha, where, in an encounter with Trilōchana-Pallava, he perished. His posthumous son, Vishṇuvardhana, however, restored the fortunes of his family and established his authority over the country between the Narmadā and the Sētu. The first point that has to be considered here is the origin of the legendary genealogy. No traces of it are to be found in the numerous records of the Eastern Chāḷukya monarchs till we come to the time of Vimalāditya’s accession. Certain features of this legendary genealogy are found in some contemporary records of the Western Chāḷukya kings of Kalyāṇi.[1] The reign of Vimalāditya marks an important stage in the development of the praśasti of the Eastern Chāḷukya kings. The records of the early monarchs of the dynasty from Kubja-Vishṇuvardhana to Guṇaga-Vijayāditya III embody, with some small variations, the praśasti found in the inscriptions of the Bādāmi Chāḷukyas, and mention generally the immediate ancestors of the donor without giving any particulars about them. With the accession of Guṇaga-Vijayāditya III there sets in a change ; while the preamble retains its original form, the part relating to the donor and his parentage undergoes a change. The names of his immediate ancestors yield place to an elaborate list of all the past kings of the dynasty, in which are set forth the most notable of their achievements, the order of their succession and the exact duration of their reigns. With the passing of each generation, the list increases in length and the praśasti is soon transformed into a family chronicle. This form was adhered to for a long time ; and no further change is perceptible in the charters of the subsequent period until the accession of Vimalāditya, when, as pointed out already, a further change was introduced in the form of a long Puranic or mythical pedigree in place of the short preamble embodying their lineage and gōtra. The circumstances under which this change was introduced are not known. It is not, however, unlikely that it was due to the Chōḷa influence on the Eastern Chāḷukya kings since the restoration to power of the main line in 999-1000 A. C. The latter had political as well as matrimonial relations with the Chōḷas.

Another point that deserves consideration is the historicity of Vijayāditya, the ancestor from whom the Chāḷukyas are said to have descended in the later Eastern Chāḷukya records. It is believed by some scholars that this Vijayāditya was a contemporary of Trilōchana-Pallava and Karikāla-Chōḷa ;[2] but the evidence on which the belief is based is quite late and untrustworthy. The Chāḷukyas of Bādāmi, the parent stock from which the other families branched off, do not refer to Vijayāditya as the progenitor of their race. They trace, on the contrary, their origin to Jayasiṁhavallabha of whom very little is known. Similarly the Chāḷukyas of Kalyāṇi make no mention of Vijayāditya in this context. The Kauṭhēm grant, no doubt, mentions Vijayāditya, not, however, as the founder of the family, but as one of the two additional names or epithets

_________________________________________________


[1] The Kauṭhēm grant of Vikramāditya V, dated 1009 A. C. mentions for instance the rule of fifty-nine nameless kings at Ayōdhyā and the subsequent migration of the family to Dakshiṇāpatha (Ind. Ant., Vol. XVI, p.21).
[2] The present writer who had subscribed to this vies formerly finds it untenable on further investigation. See K. A. Nilakanta Sastri : Cōḷa Studies. pp. 57-61.

Home Page

>
>