Contents |
Index
|
Introduction
|
Contents
|
List of Plates
|
Additions and Corrections
|
Images
|
Contents |
Chaudhury, P.D.
|
Chhabra, B.ch.
|
DE, S. C.
|
Desai, P. B.
|
Dikshit, M. G.
|
Krishnan, K. G.
|
Desai, P. B
|
Krishna Rao, B. V.
|
Lakshminarayan Rao, N., M.A.
|
Mirashi, V. V.
|
Narasimhaswami, H. K.
|
Pandeya, L. P.,
|
Sircar, D. C.
|
Venkataramayya, M., M.A.,
|
Venkataramanayya, N., M.A.
|
Index-By A. N. Lahiri
|
Other
South-Indian Inscriptions
|
Volume
1
|
Volume
2
|
Volume
3
|
Vol.
4 - 8
|
Volume 9
|
Volume 10
|
Volume 11
|
Volume 12
|
Volume 13
|
Volume
14
|
Volume 15
|
Volume 16
|
Volume 17
|
Volume 18
|
Volume
19
|
Volume
20
|
Volume 22 Part 1
|
Volume
22 Part 2
|
Volume
23
|
Volume
24 |
Volume
26
|
Volume 27 |
Tiruvarur
|
Darasuram
|
Konerirajapuram
|
Tanjavur |
Annual Reports 1935-1944
|
Annual Reports 1945- 1947
|
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2
|
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3
|
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1
|
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2
|
Epigraphica Indica
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 3
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 4
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 6
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 7
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 8
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 27
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 29
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 30
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 31
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 32
|
Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2
|
Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2
|
Vākāṭakas Volume 5
|
Early Gupta Inscriptions
|
Archaeological
Links
|
Archaeological-Survey
of India
|
Pudukkottai
|
|
|
EPIGRAPHIA INDICA
MASER INSCRIPTION OF A SULKI CHIEF
the Kauṇḍinya gōtra defeated, according to a fragmentary inscription at Bhilsā,[1] the lord of Chēdi,
killed a Śabara chief called Siṁha and restored the chiefs of Rālā-maṇḍala and Rōdapādi to their
dominions. Professor Mirashi further assumed that king Kṛishṇa of the above references was
identical with the Chandēlla prince Kṛishṇapa, son of Yaśōvarman, mentioned in the Dudahī inscriptions.[2] It is quite possible that Kṛishṇarāja, the overlord of Naraisṁha and of Kēsarin of the
inscription under study, and Kṛishṇanṛipa of the fragmentary Bhilsā inscription are identical
inasmuch as both fought a common foe, viz., the Chēdi king and as both lived about the same
period, i.e., the middle of the 10th century A.C. But there is a greater possibility of Kṛishṇarāja
of the present inscription being identical with the Rāshṭrakūṭa king, Kṛishṇa III (939-967 A.C.).
This depends upon the identification of Narasiṁha, the lord of Viḍa-dvādaśa, who was the
commander of Kṛishṇarāja’s troops.
Now as for the identification of the chiefs, Narasiṁha and his son Kēsarin, attention
may be drawn to a Chālukya family whose origin is traced likewise from Bhāradvāja
and which figures in the Bilhārī Chēdi inscription.[3] The account given there is as follows.
There was a sage Bhāradvāja (Drōṇa) whose conduct roused the wonder of the three words. Now,
in the water, of which he had taken up a handful (chuḷuka) in order to curse Drupada for the
insult offered by him, there arose a man from whom proceeded the clan of the Chalukyas and in
that powerful family was born Avanivarman who had as his father Sadhanvan and grandfather
_________________________________________________
[1] P. R. A. S. I., W. C., 1913-14, p. 59. F. E. Hall (Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, Volume XXXI
(1862), page 111, foot-note) writes :
“ At Bhilsā, within the fort, I recently found a fragmentary inscription built into the outer wall of a modern
house, and looking upon one of the streets of the town. Subjoined is all that remains of a record of which perhaps
a full half is missing.
1………śriyam=ayam=api nanv=āśritā n=āśrit=āsya
2 gēhaṁ mē Vētravatyā niyamita-janatā-kshōbham=asy=āpy=ajasram |
3 tējōmayy=atra ch=ōchchair=vvitatam=iti viditv=ādarēṇ=ātma-tulyaṁ
4 Bhāillasvāmi-nāmā ravir=avatu bhuvaḥ svāminaṁ Kṛishṇarājam ||
5 Chēdīśaṁ samarē vijitya Śabaraṁ saṁhṛiya Siṁh-āhvayaṁ
6 Rālā-maṇḍala-Rōdapādy-avanipau bhūmyāṁ pratishṭhāpya cha |
7 dēvaṁ drashṭum=ih=āgatō rachitavāṁ(n)=stōtram pavitraṁ paraṁ
8 śrīmat-Kṛishṇa-nṛip-aika-mantri-pada-bhāk Kauṇḍinya-Vāchaspatiḥ ||
9 Suchiram=iyaṁ kṛitir=āstām ruchirā śrīmad-Gajāṁkuśēyasya |
0 Kākūkēna vilikhitā Kāyastha-śē…..”
In the Salotgi pillar inscription (A) of Kṛishṇa III, dated Śaka 867 (945 A. C.), mention is made of one
Nārāyaṇa alias Gajāṅkuśa who is described as belonging to the Kauṇḍinya gōtra and as the chief minister and
sandhivigrahin of this Rāshṭrakūta king. Above, Vol. IV, pp. 60, 62-3. Kauṇḍinya-Vāchaspati, who in the
Bhilsā inscription is described as Gajāṅkuśēya (i.e., son or descendant of Gajāṅkuśa) is in all likelihood the son of
Nārāyaṇa alias Gajāṅkuśa of the Salotgi inscription. This would favour the identification of Kṛishṇarāja of the
Bhilsā inscription with Rāshṭrakūta Kṛishṇa III.
It is interesting to note in this connection that the exploits claimed by Vāchaspati find some corroboration from other sources. According to an account about Paramāra Sīyaka II found in the Navasāhasāṅkacharita
this prince is credited with the conquest of a certain chief of Ruḍapāṭī, (Canto XI, v. 89 : History of the
Paramara Dynasty, p. 42). Perhaps it was this chief of Ruḍapāṭī, called Rōdapādyavanipa in this Bhilsā inscription, that was restored to his kingdom by Vāchaspati, the minister of Kṛishṇa (III). In regard to the Śabara
prince. Siṁha, Killed by Vāchaspati, no satisfactory identification seems possible at present. However, attention
may be drawn to the fact that W. Gaṅga Mārasiṁha II, the feudatory of Kṛishṇa III is credited with a victory
over Naraga, a Śabara chief, in an inscription at Śravaṇa-Beḷagoḷa (above, Vol. V, p. 171 ; text lines 21, 54 and
96), which also mentions the northern campaigns of this Gaṅga prince. Prof. Mirashi (above, Vol. XXV, p. 280),
however, identifies the illustrious Sabara of the Bargaon temple inscription with Śabara Siṁha of the Bhilsā
inscription.
[2] Nos. 185, 186, 191 and 194 of the Annual Report on Indian Epigraphy for 1946-7 ; Ind. Ant., Vol. XVIII,
p. 237.
[3] Above, Vol. I, pp. 251 ff. and vv. 30 ff.
|