The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

A. S. Altekar

P. Banerjee

Late Dr. N. K. Bhattasali

Late Dr. N. P. Chakravarti

B. CH. Chhabra

A. H. Dani

P. B. Desai

M. G. Dikshit

R. N. Gurav

S. L. Katare

V. V., Mirashi

K. V. Subrahmanya Aiyar

R. Subrahmanyam

T. N. Subramaniam and K. A. Nilakanta Sastri

M. Venkataramayya

Akshaya Keerty Vyas

D. C. Sircar

H. K. Narasimhaswami

Sant Lal Katare

Index

Appendix

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

settled there.[1] A heavenly voice asked Vijaya to adopt āditya instead of rāja as the component part of his successors’ names. The purport of the verse seems to be that Vijaya began to call himself as belonging to the Sūryavaṁśa as against the Ikshvāku- or Raghuvaṁśa.

The language of the last three lines is Mewārī. These give the dates Saṁ. 1718, 7th day of the dark fortnight of Māgha and Saṁ 1732, 15th day of the bright fortnight of Māgha, as those of the commencement and the consecration respectively of the Rājasamudra by Rāṇā Rājasiṁha.

Slab IV ; Canto III

The third canto, inscribed on the fourth slab, opens with an invocation to Kṛishṇa and then continues the genealogical list from Vijaya onwards, which runs as follows : Vijaya-Padmāditya-Śivāditya – Dhārāditya (?) – Sujasāditya – Sumukhāditya – Sōmāditya – Śīlāditya – Kēśavāsitya - Nāgāditya – Bhōgāditya – Dēvāditya – Āśāditya – Kālabhōjāditya –Grahāditya ; thus fourteen ādityas. The sons of Grahāditya were all known as Guhilautas (Skt. Guhila-putra). The eldest of them was Vāshpa.[2]

Vāshpa was, as described above, an incarnation of Nandin. He became a disciple of the sage Hārītarāśi, likewise an incarnation of Chaṇḍa, a gaṇa of Śiva. While residing at Nāgahradapura,[3] Vāshpa worshipped the god Ēkaliṅga, i.e., Śiva, who favoured him with boons, saying : ‘ Be thou the lord of Chitrakūṭa (Chitor). Let Chitrakūṭa be always under the sway of your descendants.’ Thus, Vāshpa, at the age of fifteen received fortune through the favour of the god Ēkaliṅga and the sage Hārīta, on the 7th day of the bright fortnight of Māgha after 191 (or 791[4] ?) years had elapsed The verses 13-17 describe Vāshpa’s valour and appearance : he used to wear a gold bracelet weighing 50 palas, which was given to him by his preceptor Hārīta who, in turn, had received it from Śiva (Ēkaliṅga)[5]. In verse 18, we are told that Vāshpa conquered the Mōrī king Manurāja,[6] captured Chitrakūṭa and ruled there. The next verse says that he assumed the title of Rāvala.

>

From the following verse we learn that Vāshpa’s son was Rāvala Khamāna, from whom was born Gōvinda. Then was Mahēndra ; his son was Ālū, his son was Siṁhavarman, his son Śaktikumāra, his son Rāvala Śālivāhana, his son Naravāhana. Next Ambāprasāda, Kīrtivarman, Naravarman, Narapati, Uttama, Bhairava, Puñjarāja, Karṇāditya, Bhāvasiṁha, Gōtrasiṁha, Haṁsarāja, Śubhayōgarāja, Vairaḍa,[7] Varisiṁha, Rāvala Tējasiṁha, Samarasiṁha. This last was the husband of Pṛithā, sister of the king Pṛithvīrāja. Out of regard for this relation he assisted the Chauhāna king of Delhi (Pṛithvīrāja) in his battle against the Gōrī Sahibadīna (Mu’izzuddīn Muḥammad, also known as Shihāb-ud-dīn) of Gajjanī (Gazni). We are told

______________________________________________________________

[1] According to the Jagannātharāya temple inscription it was Pramāditya, son of Vijaya, who went to the south (above, Vol. XXIV, p. 65, v. 6). Cf. with this the story found in Pāli, of Vijaya, son of Sīhabāhu, ruler of Lāḷa (Rāḍha) who colonized Ceylon for the first time.
[2] Some of these names are historical and are found in the Āṭapur and other inscriptions. But the order of succession is here hopelessly mixed up. See Ojha, ibid., Vol. II, pp. 94 ff.
[3] The same as Nāgdā, one mile from Ēkliṅgajī. For traditions connected with Nāgdā, see Nainsī, ibid., pp. 23-24.
[4] Ojha thinks that the traditional date of Vāshpa’s succession, viz. V. S. 191, is an error for V. S. 791, see ibid., Vol. I, pp. 109-10. For various traditions and historical accounts about Vāpā, see Deviprasad, Tārīkh Rājaparshasti, pp. 16-17 and note, Ojha, ibid., Vol. I, pp. 94 ff., and Mahanot Nainsī kī Khyāt (Nāgarī Prachāriṇī Sabhā ed.), pt. i, pp. 11-12, 15-16.
[5] See also the Mount Abu Inscription of Samarasiṁha, v. 11, Ind. Ant., Vol. XXI, pp. 347 ff.
[6] Apparently identical with the Mōrī king Māna or Mānabhaṅga who ruled in Chitor in the early part of the eighth century. See An. Rep. A. S. I., 1934-35, pp. 56-57.
[7] Instead of Vairaḍa Munshi Deviprasad inadvertently gives the name Ranmal. (Tārīkh Rājprashasti, p. 19).

Home Page

>
>