The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Bhandarkar

T. Bloch

J. F. Fleet

Gopinatha Rao

T. A. Gopinatha Rao and G. Venkoba Rao

Hira Lal

E. Hultzsch

F. Kielhorn

H. Krishna Sastri

H. Luders

Narayanasvami Ayyar

R. Pischel

J. Ramayya

E. Senart

V. Venkayya

G. Venkoba Rao

J. PH. Vogel

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

and the plates[1] I have compiled the following genealogical Table, which will be found to differ considerably from the one published by Mr. Rice in Ep. Carn. Vol. VI. Introduction, p. 4.

>

I ought to state that the correctness of this Table greatly depends on the reliability[2]─ assumed here─ of the Bîrûr plates, published by Mr. Rice in Ep. Carn. Vol. VI. p. 91, No. 162. These plates record a grant by the Kadamba Dharmamahârâja Vishṇuvarman, the eldest son of the aśvamêdha-yâjin, the Dharmamahârâja Kṛishṇavarman. By stating that Vishṇuvarman was making the grant with the permission of his jyêshṭha-pitṛi (i.e. his father’s eldest brother[3]) Śântivaravarman (Śântivarman), they enable us to combine, as shown in the Table, the information given by the Bannahaḷḷi plates of Kṛishṇavarman II. (above, Vol. VI. p. 17) with that furnished by various plates from Halsî and Dêvagêri (Nos. 604, 606, 608, 610-612 of my Southern List). What I am not sure about in the Table is, whether I have correctly placed Mândhâtṛivarman and Dêvavarman. Mṛigêśavarman was an eldest son, and Mândhâtṛivarman
__________________________________________________________

[1] For the fifteen Kadamba copper-plate inscription known to us see below, p. 34, note 2.
[2] I have some doubts about the genuineness of the Bîrûr plates, but see no reason to question what is stated in them regarding the degree of relationship between Vishṇuvarman and Śântivarman.
[3] The word jyêshṭha-pitṛi is synonymous with jyêshṭha-tâta which in the Vaijayantî is explained by pitṛi-jyêshṭha, ‘ a father’s eldest brother ’; and it is actually used in this sense in the Miraj plates of Jayasiṁha II. Jagadêkamalla, Ind. Ant. Vol. VIII. p. 17a, l. 4. I may note besides that in Râm. VII. 25, 23, Mâlyavat, the eldest brother of Sumâli, is called the pita jyêshṭhaḥ of Sumâli’s daughter Kaikasî, i.e. ‘ the eldest brother of the father ’ of Kaikasî. (Ibid. verse 24 Mâlyavat’s granddaughter Kumbhînasî is called ‘ the sister ’ of Sumâli’s grandson Râvaṇa, and in verse 47 Râvaṇa is called ‘ the brother ’ of the same Kumbhînasî. This shows how vaguely words denoting relationship were used already in early times in India.)

Home Page

>
>