The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Bhandarkar

T. Bloch

J. F. Fleet

Gopinatha Rao

T. A. Gopinatha Rao and G. Venkoba Rao

Hira Lal

E. Hultzsch

F. Kielhorn

H. Krishna Sastri

H. Luders

Narayanasvami Ayyar

R. Pischel

J. Ramayya

E. Senart

V. Venkayya

G. Venkoba Rao

J. PH. Vogel

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

1446 (= A.D. 1524-25) the same chief was ruling ‘ the kingdom below and above the ghauts ’ (Mg. 62). With the extension of the kingdom the capital also seems to have been removed to Kârkaḷa from Kaḷasa ; for in an inscription of Śaka-Saṁvat 1452 ( = A.D. 1530-31) Vîra-Bairarasa-Voḍeya is said to have been ruling from his throne at Kârakaḷa (Kp. 47). It will be seen in the next paragraph how the Kaḷasa chiefs managed to add to their dominions the Kârkaḷa country below the ghauts ; but for the present it may be enough to conclude from the Koppa and Mûḍgere inscriptions published in Mr. Rice’s Ep. Carn. Vol. VI. that Bhairava II. of the subjoined inscription was a direct descendant of the Kaḷasa family, and that his hereditary ancestral dominion was the Kaḷasa country. His name, his title arirâya-gaṇḍara-ḍâvaṇi and the existence of an inscription of his in the Koppa tâluka (Kp. 57) all point to the same conclusion.

>

Turning now to the inscriptions at Kârkaḷa itself, from which further information may be expected about the ancestors of Bhairava II., we find that the colossus there was set up by Vîra-Pâṇḍya or Pâṇḍyarâya, the son of Bhairavêndra of the lunar race in Śaka 1353, and the in Śaka 1358 the same chief, who is here said to have been the son of Bhairava of th family of Jinadatta, set up the Brahma pillar in front of that colossus.[1] An unpublished inscription[2] at Hiriyaṅgaḍi near Kârkaḷa, dated in Śaka-Saṁvat 1379 ( = A.D. 1457-58), records a grant to the temple of Nêminâthasvâmin, while the arirâya-gaṇḍara-dâvaṇi, the lord of Paṭṭi-Pombuchchapura, who had obtained excellent gifts from (the goddess) Padmâvatîdêvi, and who was the uplifter of the ocean which was the family of Jinadattarâya─ Abhinava-Pâṁḍyadêva-Oḍeya, was ruling over Paṭṭi-râjya. A second inscription[3] in the same village, dated in Śaka-Saṁvat 1514 ( = A.D. 1593-94), records grants to Chandranâthasvâmin, while arirâya-gaṇḍara-dâvaṇi Pâṇḍyappa-Voḍeya, the son of Vîra-Bhairarasa-Voḍeya, was ruling his country undisturbed (sthira-râjya). This chief is no doubt a son of Bhairava II. and apparently enjoyed the independence which his father also possessed. The earliest of the Kârkaḷa inscriptions,[4] which is dated in Śaka-Saṁvat 1256 ( = A.D. 1334-35), belongs to the time of Lôkanâtharasa, who, though only a mahâmaṇḍalêśvara ‘ who had acquired the five great sounds,’ bears the royal titles samastabhuvunâśraya, pṛithvîvallabha and mahârâjâdhirâja. He also calls himself ‘ the lord of Uttara-Madhurâ,’ ‘ the jewel of the great Ugra-vaṁsa,’ ‘ the lord of Paṭṭi-Pombuchchapura,’ ‘ the worshipper of (the goddess) Padmâvatîdêvî ’ and ‘ the pupil of (the Jaina teacher) Chârukîrti-Paṇḍitadêva.’ These titles make Lôkanâtharasa decidedly a Śântara chief.[5] The existence of this record at Hiriyaṅgaḍi makes it certain that the descendants of Jinadatta ‘ removed the capital first to Sisila or Sisukali and then to Karkala, both in S. Kanara ’ (Mr. Rice’s Mysore Gazetteer, Vol. II. p. 456). It will now be easy to see how the Kaḷasa chiefs, of whom Bhairava II. was one, came to be connected with the Śântaras, traced their ancestry to Jinadatta, became more zealous Jainas than their ancestors at Kaḷasa, and eventually stepped into the place of the Śântaras in the Kârkaḷa country. From the fact that the hereditary title arirâya-gaṇḍara-dâvaṇi of the Kaḷasa chiefs and the prominent Śântara titles of Lôkanâtharasa are found combined in the inscription of the chief Abhinava-Pâṁḍyadêva-Oḍeya as early as Śaka 1379, I conclude that the Kaḷasa chiefs must have entered into close relationship of intermarriage with the descendants of the Śântara Lôkanâtharasa, about Śaka-Saṁvat 1379 ( = A.D. 1457-58), if not a little earlier. Further it may reasonably be assumed that it was by virtue of this relationship with the local Śântaras that the Kaḷasa chief Yimmaḍi-Bhairarsa-Oḍeya, mentioned in the previous paragraph, extended his rule to the territory below the ghauts in A.D. 1516-17.

As regards the territory ruled over by Bhairava II. and his ancestors, a rough idea of its extent may be formed from the name given to it─ Kaḷasa-Kârakaḷa-râjya. To ascertain its exact
________________________________________________________________

[1] Above, Vol. VII. p. 109 ff.
[2] No. 70 of the Government Epigraphist’s collection for 1901.
[3] No. 68 of the same collection.
[4] No. 71 of the same collection.
[5] See above p. 120 note 5.

Home Page

>
>