The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Bhandarkar

T. Bloch

J. F. Fleet

Gopinatha Rao

T. A. Gopinatha Rao and G. Venkoba Rao

Hira Lal

E. Hultzsch

F. Kielhorn

H. Krishna Sastri

H. Luders

Narayanasvami Ayyar

R. Pischel

J. Ramayya

E. Senart

V. Venkayya

G. Venkoba Rao

J. PH. Vogel

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

33rd year of the reign of the Chôḷa king Parântaka I.[1] found in the temple, the hill is called Tiruvânaimalai. It is also referred to in his Dêvâram by Tiruñânasambandar, the great Śaiva saint, as a stronghold of the Jainas.[2] Tradition has it that Tiruñânasambandar drove out the Jainas from the vicinity of Madura after converting the then reigning Pâṇḍya king Neḍumâran to the Śaiva faith.[3] There are still vestiges of Jaina dominancy on the hill. On a rock with sculptures overhanging a natural cave there are a number of Tamil inscriptions,[4] one of which mentions Ajjaṇandi.[5] The cave is evidently one of those which the Jainas occupied in old times.

The first inscription is engraved on the left side of the entrance into the central shrine. The letters are cut boldly and deeply, and, being in the interior, the record is in good preservation ; at the end of lines 5 and 6 are a few damaged letters which can be easily supplied from the context. The alphabet is Grantha. The final m is represented by a smaller m with a vertical stroke on its top ; see e.g. =idam in l.3. The letter ṇa is of a more archaic type than that of the Gaṅga-Pallava period,[6] and ya is also slightly different from the common form of that time.

>

The record consists of three verses, of which the first mentions the son of Mâra of the Vaidya family,[7] who was the minister (mantrin, v. 2) of the Pâṇḍya king Parântaka. He was apparently an expert in the art of composing poetry and hence is called Madhurakavi. His actual name, Mâraṅgâri, occurs in the second inscription, where he also bears the title Mûvêndamaṅgalappêraraiyan. He was a native of Karavandapura (v. 1) or, according to the second inscription, of Kaḷakkuḍi.[8] The third verse contains the date─ a Sunday in the month of Kârttika of the year 3871 (expired) of the Kaliyuga era= A.D. 770. On this day an image of the god Vishṇu was set up in the cave.

The second inscription, which, though well preserved, is not cut so deeply as he first, is a supplement to the latter and is engraved on the right side of the entrance. The characters of this record are an archaic form of Vaṭṭeluttu and Grantha. The latter is employed in some Sanskṛit words that occur in the inscription, viz. mantri (l. 2), Vaidyan (l. 2 f.), svargg-ârôhaṇa (l. 6 f.), anujan (l. 8) and mantra-padam (l. 9). The Vaṭṭeluttu of this inscription seems to be the same as that of the Madras Museum plates of Jaṭilavarman published by Mr. V. Venkayya ;[9] compare r, n, t, u and particularly k (which has not yet assumed the shape peculiar
_____________________________________________________________

[1] No. 63 of the Government Epigraphist’s collection for 1905.
[2] Ânaimâmalaiy=âdiyâyav=iḍaṅgaḷir=palav=allal-śê- r=înargaṭk=eḷiyên=alên=Riruvâlavây=ara=nirkavê.─Tiruñânasambandar’s Tiruvâlavây Padigam.
[3] Śendamil, Vol. III. p. 406.
[4] Nos. 67 to 74 of the Government Epigraphist’s collection for 1905.
[5] A Jain teacher of this name is mentioned in the rock inscriptions at Vaḷḷimalai in the North Arcot district ; above, Vol. IV. p. 141 f.
[6] See e.g. above, Vol. VI. p. 320, and South- Ind. Inscrs. Vol. III. p. 90.
[7] Probably the word vaidya is derived from vêda, and the name seems to indicate that the members of the family were proficient in the sacred literature.
[8] In an inscription at Pirânmalai (No. 143 of the Government Epigraphist’s collection for 1903) Karavandapura is mentioned as another name of Kaḷakkuḍi in the district of Kaḷakkuḍi, and in a record at Śuchîndram (above, Vol. V. p. 43) Karavandapuram is said to have been situated in the district of Kaḷakkuḍi. Kaḷakkuḍi is perhaps identical with the modern village of Kaḷakkâḍ in the Nâṅgunêri tâluka, which even to this day has a dilapidated fort (Mr. Sewell’s Lists of Antiquities, Vol. I. p. 314).
[9]Ind. Ant. Vol. XXII. p. 57. The village granted in this inscription is Vêlaṅguḍi renamed Śrîvaramaṅgalam after the Pâṇḍya king Naḍuñjaḍaiyan, one of whose birudas was apparently Śrîvara. In the Tiruvâymoli (verses 508 to 519) reference is made to Śrîvaramaṅgai or Śrîvaramaṅgalanagar, which is identified with Nâṅgunêri known to Vaishṇavas under the names Vânamâmalai and Tôdâdri. It is not unlikely that the two Śrîvaramaṅgalama are identical.

Home Page

>
>