The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Bhandarkar

T. Bloch

J. F. Fleet

Gopinatha Rao

T. A. Gopinatha Rao and G. Venkoba Rao

Hira Lal

E. Hultzsch

F. Kielhorn

H. Krishna Sastri

H. Luders

Narayanasvami Ayyar

R. Pischel

J. Ramayya

E. Senart

V. Venkayya

G. Venkoba Rao

J. PH. Vogel

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

III.─ INSCRIPTIONS OF THE THIRD YEAR OF KANISHKA.

These inscriptions are incised on a colossal standing Bôdhisattva statue, and on an octagonal stone shaft which once carried an umbrella placed over the image. That the two objects belong together is evident from their epigraphs, both of which record the donation of a Bôdhisattva and of an umbrella with a shaft (chhatra-yashṭi) on the same sate and by the same donors. The inscriptions are dated in the third year of Mahârâja Kanishka (spelled Mahâraja Kaṇishka), the third month of winter, the twenty-second day, and thus are the earliest records in which the name of the great Kushaṇa ruler occurs.[1] They supply, however, no absolute proof that at that time Kanishka’s rule extended as far as Benares, as there is no evidence that the donors were inhabitants of Kâśî. On the contrary, it will be seen in the sequel that the latter came more probably from Mathurâ and erected the image on the occasion of a pilgrimage to the sacred sites of Buddhism.

What adds considerably to the interest of these inscriptions is the fact that the chief donor, Friar Bala, a master of the Tripiṭaka and fellow of Friar Pushyavuddhi, must be identical with the donor of the Śrâvastî image in the Calcutta Museum, to which Dr. Bloch devoted an excellent article in the Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal.[2] If the identity of the names alone (that of the monk Pushyavnddhi is partly missing in the Śrâvastî inscription) were not considered sufficient proof, the striking similarity of the two images in style and workmanship and of their inscriptions in language and script cannot leave any doubt as to the correctness of my conclusion. It is not a little curious that we meet the name of Friar Bala for the third time on an inscribed Bôdhisattva image from Mathurâ,[3] preserved in the Lucknow Museum, as the spiritual preceptor of the nun Buddhamitrâ whose name is also found among the donor of the Sârnâth image. The Mathurâ image is dated in the reign of Mahârâja Huvishka in the year 33, which makes it exactly thirty years posterior to the Sârnâth one.

>

Two names found in the Sârnâth inscriptions, to which a considerable amount of interest attaches, are Kharapallâna and Vanaspara (or Vanashpara). On the umbrella shaft they are mentioned among the persons who took part in the donation, Vanaspara being mentioned first and baring the title of Kshatrapa. But on the image it is distinctly stated that Kharapallâna, here called Mahâkshatrapa, erected the Bôdhisattva together with the Kshatrapa Vanashpara. As, however, Friar Bala’s name is connected with the image in a manner which would indicate him as the donor,[4] it is not altogether patent what part the two satraps took in the donation.

The question has been raised how mendicants, who have to beg for their food and are not allowed worldly possessions,[5] could make donations which would necessarily involve a considerable expenditure. Perhaps the Sârnâth inscriptions afford an explanation. We may suppose that the two satraps supplied the necessary funds, but that the work was carried out under the supervision of Friar Bala, who thus was fully justified in calling the gift his own. Such guidance on the part of one well versed in the holy scriptures would be needed, to make sure that the works were completely orthodox. We need not go far afield to find parallels, or quote the case of Fra Angelico, who adorned San Marco at Florence with his famous frescoes. On the very
___________________________________________________________

[1] The earliest inscription of Kanishka’s reign hitherto found is that of his fifth year ; Ep. Ind. I. p. 381, No. 1.
[2] Vol. LXVIII. Part I. (1898), p. 274. Compare Anderson’s Catalogue, Vol. I. p. 194.
[3] Growse, Ind. Ant. Vol. VI. p. 217, No. 2 and Plate ; and Lüders, ibid. Vol. XXXIII. p. 39, No. 9. The exact find-spot is stated to be the Chaubârâ mound.
[4] The word dânaṁ, though not used in the Sârnâth inscriptions, is found on the Śrâvastî image.
[5] Kern, Ind. Ant. Vol. VI. p. 40. That the former practice was not strictly adhered to, has been pointed out by M. Foucher, L’art Grêco-bouddhique du Gandhâra, Vol. I. ( Paris, 1905), p. 169 ; but the rule forbidding monks to touch money is still observed, at least in Burma.

Home Page

>
>