The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions And Corrections

Images

Miscellaneous Inscriptions

Texts And Translations

Inscriptions of The Kalachuris of Sarayupara

Inscriptions of The Kalachuris of Ratanpur

Inscriptions of The Kalachuris of Raipur

Additional Inscriptions

Appendix

Supplementary Inscriptions

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

MISCELLANEOUS INSCRIPTIONS

end as 966. Though no era is specified, the date must evidently be referred to the Kalachuri era. It regularly corresponds, foe the expired Kalachuri year 966, to Sunday, the 5th October 1214 A.C., when there was a total solar eclipse visible at Kāṅkēr the tithi being the new-moon day of the pūrņimānta Kārttika, and the nakashatra, Chitrā.1 The cyclic year, however, does not agree. According to the southern luni-solar system it was Bhāva and according to the northern system, it was Bahudhānya. In neither case was it Īśvara. As Kielhorn has pointed out,2 according to the northern mean-sign system the cyclic year Iśvara lasted from the 2nd September 1212 A.C to the 29th August 1213 A.C. The discrepancy is evidently due the writer's carelessness.

The present grant mentions eight royal officers, besides the Prime Minister. Five of these figure as witnesses and one more,viⱬ., Vishṇuśarman, as the writer in the preceding grant. The prime Minister seems to have been changed during the interval. In the present he grant he is named Vāghu,while previously the post was help by Ḍōgarā. The engraver of both the grants was the same man Kēśava.

The donee of the present grant was the Gaitā Laksmīdhara, who is also mentioned in the preceding inscription. He was a student of the Yajurvēda and belonged to the Ghṛita-Kauśika gōtra.He was the son of Gadādhara and grandson of Mādhavaśarman.

Of the place-names mentioned here, Pāḍi, where the grant was made, has already been identified. It seems to have been a second capital of Pamprajāja; for, the preceding plate also, though granted at Kākaira, was actually engraved at Pādi. As for Kōṅgarā, the village donated by Pamparāja, there are three places of that name in the vicinity of Kāṅkēr. Two of them, Deo Kōṅgērā and Kōṅgērā Biyās, lie close together, 4 miles to the south-east, and the third, Hāṭ-Kōṅgarā, 5 miles to the north of Kāṅkēr. Once of these is probably meant by the Kōṅgarā of the present grant.3 Āṇḍali is probably Āndaṇi, 6 miles east of Kāṅkēr.

t>

TEXT
images/600

1 According to Pillai's Indian Ephemeris, the tithi ended 3 h. 10 m. and nakshatra, 8 h. 40 m. after mean sunrise. According to Kielhorn's calculations, the tithi ended 3 h. 33 m. and the nakshatra was chitrā by the equal space system and according to Ganga for 2 h. 38 m. After mean sunrise. See Ep. Ind, Vol. IX, p. 129.
2 Ibid., Vol. IX p. 130.
3 Hiralal connects Śrī-Prāṁkēśvara-saṁnidhāne with Kōṁgarā-grāmō and decides the question in favour of Deo Kōńgrēā. The prefix Deo of this village-named is , according to him reminiscent of the shrine of Prāṁkēśvara, which, though it has now disappeared, was previously situated close to the village. It seems, however, more probable that the grant was made at the shrine of Prāṅkēśvara and before that deity. For an analogous instance, see the Amōdā plates of Pŕitvīdēva I, above, No.76.
4 Expressed by a symbol.
5 Perhaps -गुणालंकृत- is meant. The Sunak plates of the Chaulukya Karņa have समस्तराजावली- विराजित-. see Ep. Ind., Vol. I, p. 317.
6 Read -महामाण्डलिक-.
7 Read - श्रीमद्दोपदेव-
8 Read - प्रवद्धेमन-
9 Read लक्ष्मीदेवी.
10 Read कुमारवोपदेवः. The case-affixes of the following words also are dropped.
11 Read ठक्‍कुरः असू.

 

  Home Page