The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions And Corrections

Images

Miscellaneous Inscriptions

Texts And Translations

Inscriptions of The Kalachuris of Sarayupara

Inscriptions of The Kalachuris of Ratanpur

Inscriptions of The Kalachuris of Raipur

Additional Inscriptions

Appendix

Supplementary Inscriptions

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

MISCELLANEOUS INSCRIPTIONS

AMARAKANTAK STATUE INSCRIPTION :YEAR 922

mentioned by Sir A. Cunningham's Assistant, Mr. Beglar¹, and finally noticed by Mr. R. D. Banerji in his Progress Report of the Archæological Survey, Western Circle, for 1920-21, P. 55. It is edited here for the first time from excellent impressions kindly supplied by the Superintendent, Archæological Survey, Central Circle, Patna.

The inscription is incised on the pedestal of a statue at Amarakaṇţak in Vindhya Pradesh. The statue is of a male person sitting cross-legged with hands clasped in adoration and holding a lotus-bud. On either side of him stands a female figure with a fly-whisk in her right hand. On his head there is an umbrella and on either side of it, a Gandharva carrying a garland.

The inscription contains four lines on the proper right and one line giving the date on the left. It is in a perfect state of preservation. The average size of the letters in the lines on the proper right is .4'' and in that on the left is .5'' . The characters are Nāgarī. The form of ksh in li(lē)khan-ādhyaksha-and Mādhavāksha in line 1 is noteworthy. The language is Sanskrit. Except for the date, the inscription is metrically composed. There are only two verses, both of which are numbered.

t>

The object of the inscription is to record that the statue is an exact representation of Nārāyaṇa, the son of Mādhavāksha who was the Superintendent of Writing 'here at Ratnapura'. The wording of the description suggests that the statue was made at Ratnapura and later on removed to Amarakaṇṭak.

The inscription is dated in the year 922 (expressed in decimal figures only) of an unspecified era. This date. judged by the characters, must be referred to the Kalachuri era. As an expired year, it would correspond to 1170-71 A. C.

images/587

TRANSLATION

(Verse 1) There was here, at the famous Ratnapura, a learned Superintendent of Writing, well-known by the name of Madhavāksha, who was a wish-fulfilling tree to (all) creatures.

(V. 2) He had a son named Nārāyaṇa who was (like) Arjuna in archery. This statue has been caused to be made of him, resembling him in form and excellence. The year 922.
______________

1 C. A. S. I. R., Vol VII, pp. 233 ff.
2 From ink impressions.
3 Expressed by a symbol.
4 The aksara appears more like Ku than ksha
5 Metre of this and the next verse: Anushṭubh.
6 This letter appears clearly as षि in the impressions.
7 The sense requires स्वरुपगुणतुल्या which, however, would not suit the metre. Read स्वरुपगुणसदृशी

 

  Home Page