The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions And Corrections

Images

Miscellaneous Inscriptions

Texts And Translations

Inscriptions of The Kalachuris of Sarayupara

Inscriptions of The Kalachuris of Ratanpur

Inscriptions of The Kalachuris of Raipur

Additional Inscriptions

Appendix

Supplementary Inscriptions

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

SUPPLEMENTARY INSCRIPTIONS

KARANBEL STONE INSCRIPTION OF JAYASIMHA

had evidently the Bhērā-Ghāṭ stone inscription of Narasiṁha before him; for, he has imitated some verses of it in the present record¹. The inscription is generally free from errors, but the use of achikīrttayat as the third person singular of the Aorist from V kṛit, and that of asūta, contrary to the usage in classical Sanskrit, in a passive sense in v. 31 deserve notice. As regards orthography, we have to note that the sign for v is generally used to denote b, and that the rules of sandhi have not been observed in two cases.

The inscription appears to have been left incomplete; for, there is no mention of what it was intended to record. But as conjectured by Dr. Kielhorn, it may have been intended to be put up at a temple of Śiva, since it opens with an obeisance to that god and the first four verses also are in honour of him. There is, besides, no mention of the author or the engraver and no record of the date.

After six verses invoking the blessings of Śiva, Gaṇapati and Sarasvatī, the inscription carries the genealogy of the Kalachuri rules from Yuvarājadēva, who is plainly the second king of that name, to Jayasiṁhadēva. From the description of the latter in verses 43-53, it is clear that the present record was composed during his reign. In connection with Yuvarājadēva II, we are told that he dedicated the wealth which he had obtained by conquering the kings of all quarters of Sōmēśvara. This recalls a similar statement about Lakshmaṇarāja II in the Bilhāri inscription. In regard to Karṇa, the present in- scription says that he was waited upon by the Chōḍa, Kuṅga, Hūṇa, Gauḍa, Gurjara and Kīra princes. The pedigree of Alhaṇadēvī, the mother of Narasiṁhadēva and Jayasiṁhadēva, is given as in the afore-mentioned Bhērā-Ghāṭ inscription, with this additional information that her great-grandfather Haṁsapāla was a ruler of Prāgv¬āṭa which was evidently another name of Mēwāḍ. In other respects, the present record does not make any addition to our historical knowledge.

t>

images/637
_____________________

1 Like that inscription (No. 60, above), the present record opens with verses in praise of Śiva, Gaṇapati and Sarasvatī. In vv. 21 and 34 also, the author has derived some ideas from vv. 12 and 22 of the former inscription.
2 From Kielhorn’s transcript in the Ind. Ant., Vol. XVIII, pp. 216 ff.
3 Metre: Vasantatilakā.
4 Metre of this and the next verse : Śārdūlavikrīḍita.
5 Originally न्मा, altered to न्म.
6 Metre: Mandākrāntā.
7 Metre of verses 5-7 : Anushṭubh.
8 There is an ornamental full stop here.

 

  Home Page