The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Preface

Contents

List of Plates

Abbreviations

Corrigenda

Images

Introduction

The Discovery of the Vakatakas

Vakataka Chronology

The Home of The Vakatakas

Early Rulers

The Main Branch

The Vatsagulma Branch

Administration

Religion

Society

Literature

Architecture, Sculpture and Painting

Texts And Translations  

Inscriptions of The Main Branch

Inscriptions of The Feudatories of The Main Branch

Inscriptions of The Vatsagulma Branch

Inscriptions of The Ministers And Feudatories of The Vatsagulma Branch

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

ADMINISTRATION

 

and Hiraṇyapurabhōga1, and one bhukti, viz., Asibhukti2 which was probably included in the Pākkaṇa rāshṭra. The bhōgas contained cities, towns and villages3. The names of the cities and towns generally ended nagara or pura, such as Aśvatthanagara, Pravarapura, Hirṇayapura, Chandrapura, Padmapura, etc. Sometimes towns were named after the princes who founded them. Compare Pravarapura founded by Pravarasēna II. The names of villages ended in grāma (cf. Daṅguṇa-grāma, Śīrshagrāma, Maṇḍuki-grāma, etc)., khēṭa or khēṭaka (cf. Varadākhēṭa, Aśvatthahēṭaka), vāṭaka (cf. Bōnthikavāṭaka, Pavarajjavāṭaka, etc) or viraka (cf. Karañjaviraka, Darbhaviraka, etc.). Some territorial divisions were named after the number of villages included in them. Such was Pravarēśvara-shaḍviṁśati-vāṭaka4. It appears to have been a group of twenty-six villages which received this name after a shrine of Śiva under the name of Pravarēśvara erected by Pravarasena I.

...In the earlier records of the Sātavāhanas, geographical names occur in Prakrit. As the Vākāṭakas adopted Sanskrit for writing their charters, the names of mountains, rivers, towns and villages are given in that classical language. It is interesting to note that the Sātmālā range in which the Ajaṇṭā caves are situated is called Sahya-pāda in an inscription at Ajaṇṭā5 In some cases the names of rivers have since been changed quite out of recognition. Thus the river Umā mentioned in the Jāmb plates is now known as Wannā6. Similarly the Madhunadī7, on the bank of which the village Charmāṅka (modern Chhammak) was situated, bears now the name of Chandrabhāgā. The names of the Bēṇṇā8 and the Hiraṇyā9 mentioned in the Tiroḍī and Waḍgaon plates can, however, still be recognised in the Waingaṅgā and Ēraī of modern times.

... The form of government in the Vākāṭaka age was monarchical. The king had supreme authority which was, however, checked considerably by the dictates of religious works like the Smṛitis. There is no reference to any Mantri-parīshad or Council of Ministers in Vākāṭaka grants. It is needless to say that there was no popular assembly also. still, the rule of kings was not despotic or oppressive to the people. The ideal of a Welfare State has always been kept before Indian kings by the writers of Smṛitis and Arthaśāstras and it has also been preached by great Sanskrit poets like Kālidāsa10. Many of the Vākāṭakas must have attempted to reach it. Our records are unfortunately lacking in details about the
______________

1No. 10, line 16.
2 No. 4, line 13 and No. 5, line 13.
3 Mārga, which is generally translated by ‘a way’, seems also to have denoted a territorial division. The records of the Śarabhapurīya kings, which use taddhita forms words denoting territorial divisions (e.g. vaishayika, bhogiya etc.) contain the expression Sundrikā-mārgīya derived from Sundarikā-mārga. This shows that like vishaya and bhōga, mārga also meant a territorial division. We have several such divisions in Vākāṭaka grants. See e.g. Sailapura-mārga mentioned in the Belorā plates (Nos. 4 and 5, line 13), Kauśika-mārga in the Ṛiddhapur plates (No. 8, line 12), Gēpuraka-mārga in the Indore plates (No. 9, line 8), Varadākhēṭa-mārga, in the paṭṭan plates (No. 13, line 20), Sundhāti-mārga and Yaśapura-mārga in the Pāṭnā Museum plates (No. 15, lines 2 and 6), Uttara-mārga (which is specifically mentioned as situated in nāndīkaṭa) in the Bāsim plates (No. 23, line 5) and Uttara-mārga (in Nāṅga rakaṭaka) in the India Office plate (No. 24, line 1). Mārga corresponds to the territorial division pathaka mentioned in other records.
4 No. 5, line 14.
5 No. 27, line 23.
6 No. 3, line 17.
7 No. 6, line 18.
8 No. 11, line 13.
9 No. 12, line 1.
10 Cf.प्रजनां विनपाधानाद्रवाणाद्भरणादपि।स पिता पितरस्तासां केवल जग्महेतवः॥Raghuvaṁsa. I, 24.

<< - 1 Page