The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Preface

Contents

List of Plates

Abbreviations

Corrigenda

Images

Introduction

The Discovery of the Vakatakas

Vakataka Chronology

The Home of The Vakatakas

Early Rulers

The Main Branch

The Vatsagulma Branch

Administration

Religion

Society

Literature

Architecture, Sculpture and Painting

Texts And Translations  

Inscriptions of The Main Branch

Inscriptions of The Feudatories of The Main Branch

Inscriptions of The Vatsagulma Branch

Inscriptions of The Ministers And Feudatories of The Vatsagulma Branch

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

ARCHITECTURE SCULPTURE AND PAINTING

 

...The figure of the goddess is beautifully modelled. She has a multi-stringed pearl lalāṭikā in her hair, round kuṇḍalas on the ears, jewel and pearl necklaces, one of which hangs down between her plump breasts, as well as a beautiful raśanā, bracelets and anklets. A long garland hangs down over her left leg. Her face shows perfect grace. This is one of the best sculptures of that age.

... There is a similar panel of the river goddess Yamunā1 to the right of the entrance door. She is standing on a tortoise under a mango tree. She has held its branch with her raised left hand and is plucking a fruit with the right. She has a male and a female attendant on her right and left respectively. Both of them are standing on lotus stalks.

... This temple at Tigowā has a flat roof and is therefore of an earlier age than the Gupta temple at Dēogaḍh which had a low piramidal spire. The latter is referred to the early part of the sixth century A.C.2 The temple at Tigōwā may therefore be dated about the middle of the fifth century A.C. Some time later its portico was turned into a maṇḍapa by closing the opening on both the sides by means of sculptured slabs, and another portico was added in front. The latter has now totally disappeared except for a slab on the right with the sculptured image of the Buddha incarnation of Vishṇu, which appears to have been added in a still later age.

t>

... Of the sculptured slabs used to close the opening of the original portico on the left, the upper one contains an image of the eight-armed goddess Kālī. She holds in her hands a bow, a paṭṭiśa and other weapons as also two shields. She is surrounded on both the sides by skeleton figures who are praying or making offerings to her. The lower panel on the same side shows the four-armed god Vishṇu sleeping on the coils of the serpent Śēsha, who has spread his hoods over the god’s head. The god holds the discus and the conch in his left hands. His upper right hand supports his head, while the lower one is in the abhaya-mudrā. On the lotus which has sprung from his navel sits the god Brahmā. Lakshmī, the consort of Vishṇu, is shampooing his feet. The upper slab on the right side has another panel of the goddess Kālī, while the lower one shows the Boar incarnation of Vishṇu. On one of the pillars of the portico there is the following inscription in three lines; Siddhiḥ Sētabhadra-sthāna-sāmānya-bhaṭṭaputra-Umadēvaḥ. Karṇṇakuvja.sanīpah. On the evidence of Paleography this inscription appears to be of about the eighth century A.C., which may also represent the age when these sculptured slabs were added to close the openings on the two sides of the original portico. As stated before, the panel of the Buddha incarnation must have been added in a still later age

... Another temple of the Vākāṭaka age exists at Nachnā in former Vindhya Pradesh.3 Both at Nachanā and Ganj which lies only about two miles to its east, stone inscriptions of Vyāghradēva, a feudatory of the Vākāṭaka king Pṛithivīshēṇa II, have been discovered.4 As shown before, this Vyāghradēva is probably identical with the Uchchakalpa prince Vyāghra who flourished in the last quarter of the fifth century A.C. This territory was, therefore, undoubtedly included in the empire of the Vākāṭakas in that period. Cunningham found two temples at Nachnā, of which the earlier one, said to be dedicated to the goddess Pārvatī, probably belongs to the Vākāṭaka age.5 The garbhagṛiha has now no image on its pedestal.
____________________

1 See Plate G.
2 The Gupta Temple at Deogarh (M.A.S.I., No. 70), p. 11.
3 See Plate H. 4 Nos. 20-22. 5 C.A.S.R., Vol. XXI, p. 96. Banerji thought that this temple was decidedly of the early Gupta period, i.e. 4th-5th century A.C. P.R.A.S.I., W.C. for 1918-19, p. 61.

<< - 8 Page