The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Preface

Contents

List of Plates

Abbreviations

Corrigenda

Images

Introduction

The Discovery of the Vakatakas

Vakataka Chronology

The Home of The Vakatakas

Early Rulers

The Main Branch

The Vatsagulma Branch

Administration

Religion

Society

Literature

Architecture, Sculpture and Painting

Texts And Translations  

Inscriptions of The Main Branch

Inscriptions of The Feudatories of The Main Branch

Inscriptions of The Vatsagulma Branch

Inscriptions of The Ministers And Feudatories of The Vatsagulma Branch

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

INSCRIPTIONS OF THE MINISTERS AND FEUDATORIES OF THE
VATSAGULMA BRANCH

 

south by the Aurangābād District (ancient Mūlaka). South of Mūlaka lay Aśmaka (modern Ahmadnagar and Bhir districts). The district obtained its modern name Khāndēsh in much later times1.

... The royal family described in the present inscription, which rose to power in the second half of the third century A.C., must have first owed allegiance to the Ābhīras who succeeded the Sātavāhanas as an Imperial power in the Deccan2. After the fall of the Ābhīras, they seem to have transferred their allegiance to the Vākāṭakas. A fragmentary verse in the adjoining Cave XVI at Ajaṇṭā states that the Vākāṭaka Emperor Harishēṇa either raided or exacted tribute from Trikūṭa, which comprised the territory round Nāsik. Khāndēsh which lay between Vidarbha and Trikūṭa must have likewise submitted to the Vākāṭakas. In fact, the present inscription mentions the Vākāṭaka Emperor Harishēṇa in a manner which indicates that he was the lord paramount of this royal family. The Daśakumāracharita gives in the eight Uchchhvāsa, a narrative which seems to have had a historical basis3. As shown elsewhere, it reflects the last period of Vākāṭaka rule, viz., the reign of Harishēṇa’s son. The narrative mentions the ruler of Ṛishīka (modern Khāndēsh where this royal family was reigning) as a feudatory of the Emperor of Vidarbha. This is a further indication that this royal family owned the suzerainty of the Vākāṭakas.

t>

...We have no records of any successors of Kṛishṇadāsa’s son, who, as we have seen, was a contemporary of the Vākāṭaka Emperor Harishṇa. The dynasty appears to have been overthrown by the Kalachuris of Māhishmatī who occupied Northern Mahārāshṭra after the downfall of the Vākāṭakas. Hoards of the silver coins (rūpaks) of Kṛishṇarāja, the founder of the Kalachuri power, have been found both in the Nāsik District4 and Berar5, which border Khāndēsh on the west and the east respectively. A coin of the same king has recently been reported from Nandurbār in the Khandesh District.

images/124

__________________

1 The present name of Khāndēsh is said to have been given to the district in Musalman times to suit the title Khān conferred on the Faruki kings by Ahmad I of Gujarāt. E.H.D., p. 138.
2 The grants of three other kings of Khāndēsh are dated in the Ābhīra era. A.B.O.R.I., Vol. XXV, pp. 98 f. ; C.I.I., Vol. IV, pp. 5-12.
3 Introduction, above, pp. xxxii f.
4 The coins of Kṛishṇarāja were discovered at Devlāṇā near Nāsik. Bom. Gaz., Vol. I, pt. ii, P. 13.
5 A hoard of 1600 coins was discovered at Dhāmōri in Berar.
6 From the impressions supplied by the Government Epigraphist.
7 Both Bhagvanlal and Bühler read -मावर्नि., but the akshara preceding मा is certainly द्रु, and there is little doubt that the whole expression was भवद्रुमाशर्नि. The poet has used अशनि again in Verse 12 below.
8 Bühler read कर्मणो, but the subscript m of rmma is clear in the facsimile. 9 Metre : Vaṁśatha.
10 Bhagvanlal read नेशा which will hardly suit the context. Bühler read नेन, the preceding akshara is ल. Read नाम्ना जनपालनेन.
11 Metre : Upajāti.
12 Metre of verse 3-7 : Aupachchhandasika.

<< - 21 Page