Contents |
Index
|
Introduction
|
Contents
|
List of Plates
|
Additions and Corrections
|
Images
|
Contents |
Chaudhury, P.D.
|
Chhabra, B.ch.
|
DE, S. C.
|
Desai, P. B.
|
Dikshit, M. G.
|
Krishnan, K. G.
|
Desai, P. B
|
Krishna Rao, B. V.
|
Lakshminarayan Rao, N., M.A.
|
Mirashi, V. V.
|
Narasimhaswami, H. K.
|
Pandeya, L. P.,
|
Sircar, D. C.
|
Venkataramayya, M., M.A.,
|
Venkataramanayya, N., M.A.
|
Index-By A. N. Lahiri
|
Other
South-Indian Inscriptions
|
Volume
1
|
Volume
2
|
Volume
3
|
Vol.
4 - 8
|
Volume 9
|
Volume 10
|
Volume 11
|
Volume 12
|
Volume 13
|
Volume
14
|
Volume 15
|
Volume 16
|
Volume 17
|
Volume 18
|
Volume
19
|
Volume
20
|
Volume 22 Part 1
|
Volume
22 Part 2
|
Volume
23
|
Volume
24 |
Volume
26
|
Volume 27 |
Tiruvarur
|
Darasuram
|
Konerirajapuram
|
Tanjavur |
Annual Reports 1935-1944
|
Annual Reports 1945- 1947
|
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2
|
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3
|
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1
|
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2
|
Epigraphica Indica
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 3
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 4
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 6
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 7
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 8
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 27
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 29
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 30
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 31
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 32
|
Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2
|
Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2
|
Vākāṭakas Volume 5
|
Early Gupta Inscriptions
|
Archaeological
Links
|
Archaeological-Survey
of India
|
Pudukkottai
|
|
|
EPIGRAPHIA INDICA
tion, did rule actually for 12 years before Vijayāditya’s coronation in June 1031 A. C., he must
have begun to reign in June 1019 A. C. As Vimalāditya was still ruling at the time of the Raṇastipūṇḍi grant in August 1018 A. C., Rājarāja I appears to have succeeded his father almost immediately. As the available evidence regarding the exact starting point of Rājarāja’s reign gives
two different dates, viz., 1019 and 1020 A. C., it can be safely stated that his rule must have commenced some years before the date of his coronation which took place, as stated in his own records
including the present one, on the 16th August, 1022 A. C.
If Rājarāja began to rule either in 1019 or in 1020 A. C., as shown above, there must have been
some cause for the postponement of his coronation until 1022 A. C. Although no such reason is
disclosed by the Eastern Chāḷukya records, the contemporary Chōḷa inscriptions distinctly indicate
the existence of political disturbance in Vēṅgī at this time.[1]
(iv) The last point of interest to be noted in this section is the marriage of Rājarāja I
with Ammaṅgā (lines 64-65), the daughter of his maternal uncle, Rājēndra Chōḷadēva, a
fact known hitherto only from the records of his descendants. The marriage was not merely the
renewal of an old alliance between the Chōḷa and Eastern Chāḷukya royal families. It was
also intended to serve a political purpose. Rājēndra-Chōḷa aimed at providing a permanent bond
by which Vēṅgī might be attached to his kingdom ; therefore, he bestowed the hand of his
daughter Ammaṅgā on his nephew.
II. The most important part of the present inscription is the passage which narrates the circumstances in which the gift was mad. It states (line 77-85) that the general Rājarāja Brahma-Mahārāja rose to eminence by the grace of the king Rājēndra-Chōḷa Madhurāntaka and guarded his
kingdom like a serpent protecting hidden treasure. No sooner did he receive the orders of his
sovereign than he marched into the Āndhra country at the head of a vast army, accompanied by two
other generals, Uttama-Chōḍa Chōḍakōn and Uttama-Chōḷa Milāḍuḍaiyān. The three Tamil commanders, who were like the three fires bent upon the destruction of the forest which was the Karṇāṭa army, became engaged in a fierce battle with the commanders of the king of Karṇāṭa.
The battle between the two armies is described vividly (lines 85-93). The engagement,
however, seems to have ended indecisively or at any rate not in a victory for the Chōḷa forces ;
for it is said that the commanders of both the sides who participated in the fight perished with
their forces (lines 93-96). It was in these circumstances that the Eastern Chāḷukya Rājarāja I
set up, in memory of Rājarāja Brahma-Mahārāja, a temple dedicated to God Śiva called Rāja-rājēśvaram in the village of Kalidiṇḍi. Two other Śiva temples were also built in memory of
Uttama-Chōḷa Chōḷakōn and Uttama-Chōḷa Milāḍuḍaiyān respectively. For conducting worship
in these temples, and for the maintenance of a choultry for feeding fifty students, etc., the village
of Kalidiṁḍi renamed Madhurāntakanallūr, together with two other villages called Kaḍaparru
and Āvakūru, was granted by the king (lines 96-103).
The place and date of the battle are not stated in the record. It would, however, be
possible to fix them with some precision. It may be noted that the record states that memorial
temples for the deceased Chōḷa generals were founded. Such temples are sometimes founded on the
_________________________________________________
1 Nos. 23, 24, 30, 31, 751 and 752 of 1917 of the Mad. Epi. Coll. These epigraphs of the reign of Rājēndra-Chōḷadēva from the Madakasira taluk of the Anantapur District, all studied together, allude to an expedition sent
by the Chōḷa emperor Rājēndra I against Vēṅgī about the 10thy r 1021 A.C.) of his reign to overcome some
trouble there, under the leadership of one of his generals, named Areyan Rājarājan alias Vikrama-Chōḷa Chōḷiyavaralyan. Of them No. 31 of 1917 refers probably to a battle which he fought with the Kaliṅgas, Oḍḍas and
Telugus, while another (751 of 1917) expressly declares that ‘the king of Vēṅgī ran away on hearing that the Chōḷa
king had ordered his general Sōliyavarasan to conquer that country. These records which, as pointed out by
Professor K. A. Nilakanta Sastri, ‘obviously belong to the same time’ (Colas, I. p. 279), allude to a military
expedition sent by Rājēndra-Chōḷa about the 10th year of his reign (1021 A.C.) to conquer Vēṅgī.
|