EPIGRAPHIA INDICA
Buddhavarman (l. 8), the grandson of the M. Kumâravishṇu (I.) (l. 6), and the great-grand-son of the M. Skandavarman (l. 3). It records that the king granted to a Brâhmaṇa a field
in the village of Chendalûra (ll. 14 and 16 f.) in Kavachakâra-bhôga (l. 16), a subdivision of
the district of Karmâ[ṅ]ka-râshṭra (l. 14) or Kammâ[ṅ]ka-râshṭra<0/strong> (l. 16).
Of the localities mentioned in this record Kâñchîpura (l. 1) is Conjeeveram, the ancient
capital of the Pallavas, and Chendalûra is Chendalûr in the Nellore district, the village where
the plates were unearthed. Karmâṅka- or Kammâṅka-râshṭra, i.e. ‘ the district named (after)
Karma or Kamma,’ is mentioned as Karma-râshṭra in two Eastern Chalukya grants,[1] and as
Kamma-râshṭra in a third one.[2]
The wording of this inscription is very similar to that of three other Pallava grants, which
belong to the reign of Siṁhavarman, viz. the Pîkira, Mâṅgaḷûr and Uruvupalli grants.[3] Nay, ll.
1-14 are almost identical with ll. 4-16 of the Uruvupalli grant.[4] The names of the kings, however,
differ in those three grants on the one hand and in the Chendalûr plates on the other, and no lineal
connection can be established between both sets of kings. The name Skandavarman occurs in
both, but Kumâravishṇu I., Buddhavarman and Kumâravishṇu II., who were the three direct
descendants of Skandavarman according to the Chendalûr plates, are unknown to the three other
grants. Nor do their names occur in the Pallava pedigree of the Kâśâkuḍi plates, which
begins with Siṁhavishṇu.[5] Under these circumstances our only guide can be the palæography
of those different records. The alphabet of the Chendalûr plates is more archaic than those of
the Kûram and Kâśâkuḍi plates, but resembles those of the Pîkira, Mâṅgaḷûr and Uruvupalli
grants, from which it differs chiefly in the omission of the horizontal strokes at the top of letters.
But a point which stamps it as more modern is the fact that r, k and subscribed u consist
of two vertical lines of nearly equal length, while in the Pîkira, Maṅgaḷûr and Uruvupalli grants
the left line is still considerably shorter. Hence we may conclude that the four Pallava kings of
the Chendalûr plates ruled in the interval between Siṁhavarman and Siṁhavishṇu. It is to
be hoped that future discoveries will enable us to bridge some of the gaps in the direct
succession of the Pallavas, one of which is now partially filled by the information contained in
the Chendalûr plates.
TEXT.[6]
First Plate.
1 Svasti[7] [||*] Jitam=bhagavatâ [||*] Svasti [||*] Vijaya-Kâñchî[p]urâd=abhyuchchita-
śakti-
2 siddhi-sampannasya pratâp-ôpanata-râja-maṇḍalasya vasudhâ-tal-aika-[vîra]-
3 sya mahârâja-śrî-Skandavarmmaṇaḥ prapautrô dêva-dvija-guru-vṛiddh-â(ô)pa[châ]-
4 yinô vivṛiddha-vinayasy=ânêka-gô-hiraṇya-bhu(bhû)my-âdi-pradânaiḥ pravṛiddha-
[dharmma-sa]-
Second Plate ; First Side.
5 ñchayasya prajâ-pâlana-dakshasya lôkapâlânâm=[8]pañchamasya
6 lôkapâlasya satyâtmanô maharaja-śrî-Kumâravishṇôḥ pautrô bhagavad-bhakti-sa-
7 mbhâvita-sarvva-kalyâṇasy=âdi-râja-pratispa[r*]ddhi-guṇa-samudayasy=âmi-
8 tâtmanô mahârâja-śrî-Buddhavarmmaṇaḥ putraḥ prajâ-saṁrañjana-paripâlan-ôdyô-
________________________________________________________
[1] Ind. Ant. Vol. VII. p. 187, text l. 12, and Vol. XX. p. 105, text l. 16.
[2] See p. 238 below.
[3] See p. 160 above.
[4] Only the compound beginning with âdirâja is peculiar to the Chendalûr plates (l. 7).
[5] South-Ind. Inscr. Vol. II. p. 344, and Dyn. Kan. Distr. p. 323.
[6] From two sets of ink-impressions.
[7] On the left margin of plate i.
[8] Corrected from lôkapâlônâm =.
|