The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Bhandarkar

T. Bloch

J. F. Fleet

Gopinatha Rao

T. A. Gopinatha Rao and G. Venkoba Rao

Hira Lal

E. Hultzsch

F. Kielhorn

H. Krishna Sastri

H. Luders

Narayanasvami Ayyar

R. Pischel

J. Ramayya

E. Senart

V. Venkayya

G. Venkoba Rao

J. PH. Vogel

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

the village of Amînâbâd in the Sattenapalli tâluka of the Kistna district there is an inscription[1] of Râcha-Vema, son of Vêma, who is said to have, in the year Manmatha corresponding to the Śaka year 1337 (expired), excavated a channel to feed the tank called Santâna-Sâgara, which had been dug by his mother Sûrâmbâ. We know from the Phiraṅgipuram inscription[2] that Peda-Kômaṭi-Vêma’s wife Sûrâmbâ had a tank excavated and called it Santâna-Sâgara. The two inscriptions are about two miles distant from each other, and they, no doubt, refer to the same tank. This establishes the fact that Peda-Kômaṭi’s successor Râcha was his son and not his brother, and the same conclusion is pointed to by the Velugôṭivâri Vâṁśâvaḷi. This book says that Mâcha (who was the only brother Peda-Kômaṭi-Vêma seems to have had), son of Kômaṭi, was killed in battle by Pina-Vêdagiri or Kumâra-Vêdagiri, great-grandson of Mâdânîḍu who had fought with Anapôta-Reḍḍi at Dharaṇikôṭa, and that Mâcha’s elder brother Vêma killed Pina-Vêdagiri and was himself killed by Pina-Vêdagiri’s younger brother Liṅga. When Peda-Kômaṭi-Vêma died, he had, therefore, no brother to succeed him.

The Daṇḍakavili, says that the Reḍḍis of Koṇḍavîḍu ruled for 100 years and distributes the period as follows :─
Pôlaya-Vêma or Vêma ; Śaka 1242 to 1253 (both years inclusive).
Anapôta ; Śaka 1253-1283.
Anavêma ; Śaka 1284-1295.
Kumâragiri ; Śaka 1296-1309.
Peda-Kômaṭi-Vêma ; Śaka 1310-1337.
Râcha-Vêma ; Śaka 1338-1341.

>

This distribution conflicts with the dates furnished by some of the inscriptions quoted above. Taking 100 years as the approximate total of the reigns of the six Reḍḍi chiefs, I would redistribute it as follows, so as to make the distribution accord with the latest information available on the subject :─
Pôlaya-Vêma or Vêma ; Śaka 1242-1271 (30 years).
Anapôta ; Śaka 1272-1283 (12 years).
Anavêma ; Śaka 1284-1299 (16 years).
Kumâragiri ; Śaka 1300-1320 (21 years).
Peda-Kômaṭi-Vêma ; Śaka 1321-1337 (17 years).
Râcha-Vêma ; Śaka 1338-1341 (4 years).

TEXT.[3]

First Plate.

________________________________________________________________

[1] This inscription consists of a Telugu verse in the Sîsa metre and is engraved on the western side of a bullock named Pullaribôḍu, north-east of Amînâbâd which adjoins Phiraṅgipuram. At the end of the verse are the words Śrînâtha-kṛiti, i.e. ‘ Śrînâtha’s composition.’
[2] No. 162 of the Government Epigraphist’s collection for 1899.
[3] From ink-impressions.

Home Page

>
>