The Indian Analyst

South Indian Inscriptions







List of Plates


Additions And Corrections



Inscriptions And Translations

Kalachuri Chedi Era



Early Kalachuris of Mahishmati

Early Gurjaras

Kalachuri of Tripuri

Kalachuri of Sarayupara

Kalachuri of South Kosala

Sendrakas of Gujarat

Early Chalukyas of Gujarat

Dynasty of Harischandra




Economic Condition



Genealogical Tables

Texts And Translations

Incriptions of The Abhiras

Inscriptions of The Maharajas of Valkha

Incriptions of The Mahishmati

Inscriptions of The Traikutakas

Incriptions of The Sangamasimha

Incriptions of The Early Kalcahuris

Incriptions of The Early Gurjaras

Incriptions of The Sendrakas

Incriptions of The Early Chalukyas of Gujarat

Incriptions of The Dynasty of The Harischandra

Incriptions of The Kalachuris of Tripuri

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27





Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India



No. 1; PLATE I

THIS inscription was first brought to notice by Messrs. Edward W. west and Arthur A. West in their article entitled ‘Nasik cave Inscriptions’ published in the Journal of the Bombay Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, VoI. VIII (1864), pp. 37 ff. They published a fairly correct eye-copy of the record and, though they gave no transcript of it, they noticed correctly the date which occurs in lines 2-3. The record was transcribed, with notes and an English translation by DR. R.G. Bhandarkar in his notices published in the Transactions of the International Congress of Orientalists, London, 1874, pp. 341 ff. It was next copied by Pandit Bhagvanlal Indraji. Though the Pandit did the work with his wonted skill, his facsimile published in the Archœological survey of Western India, VoI. IV, plate LIII, No. 12, is considerably worked up by hand. In 1883 Pandit Bhagvanlal published a transcript of the inscription together with a Sanskrit rendering and an English translation in the Gazetteer of the Bombay Presidency, VoI. XVI (Nasik District) pp. 579 ff. In the same year DR. Bühler also, working of Pandit Bhagvanlal’s facsimile, published a transcript and an English translation of the epigraph in the aforementioned volume of the Archœological survey of Western India. The inscription was finally edited with a purely mechanical facsimile by Prof. E. Senart in the Epigraphia Indica, VoI. VIII, pp. 88 ff. and Plate VII (15). Prof. Senart’s edition has remained the standard one to the present day. The record is edited here from the Plate accompanying Prof. Senart’s article as well as a fresh estampage supplied by the Superintendent, Arcæological Survey, Western Circle.

The epigraph is incised on the left wall of the court in Cave No. X on the so-called Pāndu-lēna hill, 5 miles south-west from Nasik, the head-quarters of the Nasik District in the Bombay state. It seems to have originally consisted of 15 lines, but only the first thirteen of them can now be read. Even in this part, the record has suffered considerably on the right-hand side by exposure to weathe, and three or four aksharas at the end of almost every line have now become almost illegible. IN several cases they can, however, be read from the traces left behind, or restored conjecturally. The average size of the letters is 1.2’’.

The characters belong to the Brāhmi alphabet of a slightly later age than in the inscriptions of the Sātavāhanas. In some respects however as in the subscript tripartite y, they show archaic forms; see Mādhariputrasya 1. I; -vāstavyasya, 1. 7, etc. Notice also p in ganapaka-, 1. 4, which has a long vertical on the left. As Dr. Bühler has already noticed,1 Some of the letters are cursive; see, e.g., the forms of t and n, derived from looped types, in parvata-, 1. 7 and Īśvarasēnasya, 1. 2, as well as the form of jňa in rājňah, 1. I. Some of the other peculiarities worthy of notice are as follows:––u in upāsikāyā, 1. 6, has a horizontal stroke at the top; the rare ō occurs in ōdayamtrika-, 1. 10; the medical u in duhitrā, 1. 4, is formed by a curve open on the right, like the medial ri of later times. Kh has a loop on the right; see sukh-ārtham 1.7; y is generally flat as in Kushāna records but the

1I.P., p. 43.


  Home Page