The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Preface

Contents

List of Plates

Abbreviations

Additions And Corrections

Images

Miscellaneous

Inscriptions And Translations

Kalachuri Chedi Era

Abhiras

Traikutakas

Early Kalachuris of Mahishmati

Early Gurjaras

Kalachuri of Tripuri

Kalachuri of Sarayupara

Kalachuri of South Kosala

Sendrakas of Gujarat

Early Chalukyas of Gujarat

Dynasty of Harischandra

Administration

Religion

Society

Economic Condition

Literature

Coins

Genealogical Tables

Texts And Translations

Incriptions of The Abhiras

Inscriptions of The Maharajas of Valkha

Incriptions of The Mahishmati

Inscriptions of The Traikutakas

Incriptions of The Sangamasimha

Incriptions of The Early Kalcahuris

Incriptions of The Early Gurjaras

Incriptions of The Sendrakas

Incriptions of The Early Chalukyas of Gujarat

Incriptions of The Dynasty of The Harischandra

Incriptions of The Kalachuris of Tripuri

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

RELIGION

where these Ācharyas flourished was probably situated on the Madhuvēni.1 (Mohwar of the maps), and may be identical with the modern village Mahuā which lies only a mile to the south of Tērahi. This Purandara allias Mādhumatēya must be distinguished from his namesake who founded the matha or Mattamayūra and was a contemporary Of Avanti- varman ; for, the latter flourished four generations before Chūdāśiva, while the former immediately preceded him.3

Another line of Śaiva Ācharyas is also mentioned in the Bilhāri inscription. While describing the grants of Nōhalā the queen of Yuvarājadēva I, the inscription gives the following genealogy:—
_________________________
images/cliv

t>

1The river Madhuveni is mentioned in an inscription at Terahi dated V. 960 (903 A.C) Ind. Ant., Vol. XVII, pp. 201 ff. Mahua has the remains of three temples two of which are dedicated to Mahadeva They are assigned to the seventh century A.C. on the Palæographic evidence of a Sankrit inscription which exists on the porch of one of them. The river Madhumati is mentioned in Bhavabhuti’s Malatmadhava, Act IX.
2Banerji identified the two. This has vitaited the genealogy given by him in H.T.M., p. 112 The first Purandara was called Mattamyuranatha while the second was Madhumateya.
3Nohala donated some villages to Isvarasiva as vidya-dhana.

 

  Home Page