The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Preface

Contents

List of Plates

Abbreviations

Additions And Corrections

Images

Miscellaneous

Inscriptions And Translations

Kalachuri Chedi Era

Abhiras

Traikutakas

Early Kalachuris of Mahishmati

Early Gurjaras

Kalachuri of Tripuri

Kalachuri of Sarayupara

Kalachuri of South Kosala

Sendrakas of Gujarat

Early Chalukyas of Gujarat

Dynasty of Harischandra

Administration

Religion

Society

Economic Condition

Literature

Coins

Genealogical Tables

Texts And Translations

Incriptions of The Abhiras

Inscriptions of The Maharajas of Valkha

Incriptions of The Mahishmati

Inscriptions of The Traikutakas

Incriptions of The Sangamasimha

Incriptions of The Early Kalcahuris

Incriptions of The Early Gurjaras

Incriptions of The Sendrakas

Incriptions of The Early Chalukyas of Gujarat

Incriptions of The Dynasty of The Harischandra

Incriptions of The Kalachuris of Tripuri

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

TRAIKUTAKAS

similarity of their names suggests some sort of connection between them. The Traikūtakas were probably at first the feudatories of the Ābhīras whose era they adopted in their records. On the decline of the Ābhīra power, they seem to have asserted their independence. None of the three Traikutaka kings, known from inscriptions and coins, seems to have assumed a higher title than Maharaja. But two of them are known to have issued coins, while one a of them, Dahrasēna, explicitly mentions in his copper plate inscription that he had performed an Aśvamēdha sacrifice. The later Traikūtakas were, therefore, probably independent monarchs, though, as we shall see below, the last of them was ultimately defeated and forced to pay tribute by the Vākātaka king Harishēna.

The mention of Trikūta in the description of Raghu’s digvijaya suggests that Kālidāsa, who flourished about 400 A.C. during the reign of Chandragupta II-Vikramāditya, knew of a Traikutaka kingdom on the western coast. The three copper-plate inscriptions of the dynasty edited here belong to a later date. From them and from coins, we get the following genealogy of the Traikutakas:–
images/xlii

t>

The first of these, Indradatta, is known only from the coins of his son Dahrasēna. He is therein given the title Mahārāja. As his son was ruling in the Kalachuri year 207 (=456-57 A.C.), he may be assigned to the period 415-440 A.C. The second king Dahrasēna is known from his Pārdi plates and silver coins1 found at Daman in South Gujarat,2 Karhad in the Satara District,3 Kazad in the Indapur tālukā of the Poona District4 and some other places.,5 Like his father, he calls himself Maharaja both in the copper-plate inscription and coin-legends. The former supplies the additional information that he performed an Aśvamēdha sacrifice. On his coins he called himself paramavaishnava, ‘a devout worshipper of Vishnu’, and in his copper-plate inscription, Bhagavat-pāda-karmakara, ‘a servant of the feet of Bhagavat’. The Pardi plates were issued from the victorious royal camp at Āmrakā, and record the donation of a village in the Antarmandali vishaya, which, on the analogy of the Antar-Narmadā vishaya mentioned in inscription No. II, seems to have comprised the territory on both the banks of the Mandalī or modern Mindhōla river. The places mentioned in the grant can be identified in the country between the Pūrnā and the Mindhōlā in south Gujarat. As shown elsewhere, the date of the plates, the year 207, refers to the Kalachuri era, and corresponds to 456-57 A.C. Dahrasēna may, therefore, have reigned from circa 440 A.C. to 465 A.C. Vyaghrasēna, the son and successor of Dahrasēna, is known from his Surat plates and silver coins found at Kazad in the Indapur taluka and other places. His coins,6 which
_______________________

1 The coins have the legend Maharaj-Andradatta-putra-paramavashnava-śra-Maharaja-Dahrasana representing Mahārāj-Endradatta-putra-paramavaishnava-śrī-Mahārāja-Dahrasēna.
2 Bomb. Gaz., Vol, part i, p. 58.
3 J. B. B. R. A. S., 1862, p.II.
4 C. A. D., p. clx, n.2.
5 ’The provenance of the coins, considerable numbers of which exist in various collections has not been very fully recorded.’ Introded., C.A.D.,p. clx. Some Traikūtaka coins have been recently brought to light at Kamrej near Surat. A.B.I.A. for 1935, p. 34.
6These coins have the legend Maharaja-Dahrasana-putra-parama-vaishnava-śra-Maharaja-Vyaghrasana representing Mahārāja-Dahrasēna-putra-paramavaishnava-śrī-Mahārāia-Vyāghrasēna. J.R.A.S. for 1905, pp. 806-7.

 

  Home Page