The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions And Corrections

Images

Miscellaneous Inscriptions

Texts And Translations

Inscriptions of The Kalachuris of Sarayupara

Inscriptions of The Kalachuris of Ratanpur

Inscriptions of The Kalachuris of Raipur

Additional Inscriptions

Appendix

Supplementary Inscriptions

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

INSCRIPTIONS OF THE KALACHURIS OF RATANPUR

RATANPUR STONE INSCRIPTIONS OF VAHARA : YEAR 1552

The inscriptions are incised on two stones built into the front wall of the sanctumA on the left and B on the right side of the door-way—in the temple of Mahāmāyā at Ratanpur in the Bilaspur District of Madhya Pradesh. A contains five, and B, eleven lines. The former covers a space measuring 1' broad by 3½ " high and the latter, a space measuring 11¾" broad by 6½" high. The characters of both are Nāgarī and the language, barbarous Sanskrit. There are several mistakes of orthography and grammar in both the records, but especially in B. Both the records are metrically composed. A contains 3 and B, 8 verses. The only orthographical peculiarities worth noticing here are that kshy is used for khy in vikshyātā in 1. 2, j for y in jantra-vidyā in 1. 4 and sh for kh in alashadāsa (for lēkhadāsa) in 1. 10, all in B.

The first inscription (A) refers itself to the reign of Vāharēndra or king Vāhara. That he belonged to the Haihaya dynasty is clear from inscription No. 105., below. It compares Ratnapura to the city of Indra (i. e., Amarāvatī in heaven) and states that the king Vāharēndra, who stayed there, had a force of a thousand horses and sixty elephants, evidently stationed at Ratanpura. It next mentions Gōvinda, the Mayor of Ratanpura, who was Vāharēndra's (trusted) servant in all affairs.

The second inscription (B) opens with a salutation to Viśvakarman, the architect of gods. It then lavishes fulsome praise on the Sūtradharā Chhītaku of the Kōkāsa family. His father Manmatha and brother Māṇḍana are also mentioned. All of them find mention in the Kosgain stone inscription of Vāhara.¹

t>

Both the inscriptions are thus of the same period. The first is undated, but the second gives the year 1552 without further particulars. This must, of course, be referred to the Vikrama era and corresponds to 1495-96 A.C. In the absence of the necessary details, the date does not admit of verification.

images/555

1 See below, No. 105, 11. 19-20.
2 From the original stones.
3 Read देवैर्नरैर्दुर्लभम्‌
4 One akshara is missing here. Read तत्तत्रैव.
5 Read -षष्‍टि-.
6 Grammar requires a reading like हयानाम्‌.
7 Metre: Śārdūlavikrīḍita.
8 No such word is known to Sanskrit lexicons. Perhaps the intended reading is तत्रास्ति.
9 Read नाम्ना गोर्विदो.
10 Metre: Anushṭubh..
11 Read स्वामिनो राज्यभारकः.
12 Read कार्याकार्यसमर्थोऽयं गोर्विदो नाम विश्रुतः ।Metre: Anushṭubh.

 

  Home Page