The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Addenda Et Corrigenda

Images

EDITION AND TEXTS

Inscriptions of the Paramaras of Malwa

Inscriptions of the paramaras of chandravati

Inscriptions of the paramaras of Vagada

Inscriptions of the Paramaras of Bhinmal

An Inscription of the Paramaras of Jalor

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

INSCRIPTIONS OF THE PARAMARAS OF CHANDRAVATI

TEXT [1]

images/262

No. 77 ; PLATE LXXXIX
DHĀNTĀ IMAGE INSCRIPTION OF THE TIME OF SŌMASIṀHA
[Vikrama] Year 1277

...THIS inscription was discovered by C. L. Suri, then Technical Assistant in the office of the Chief Epigraphist, [11] at Dhāntā, a village about 10 kms. south-southwest of Sirōhī, the headquarters of a tehsīl and district of the same name in south-west Rājasthān. Mentioning some other images found at the place, the same scholar concluded that it is an ancient site where a temple of Śiva and another of Vishṇu stood side by side at one time. He also edited the inscrip-
>
_____________________________________________

[1] From facsimile facing p. 137 of Ep. Ind., Vol. XXXII.
[2] By wrong strokes of the chisel, the consonant of the preceding letter appears as त्र
[3] This quarter of the verse is metrically defective as the second akshara is short instead of long, as required.
[4] The sign of anusvāra appears more on the preceding letter.
[5] The intended reading appears to be काकलदेवोभूत्‌.
[6] This pāda of the verse is again metrically defective.
[7] Buy wrong carving the medial ā which is a component of the mātrā attached to his letter appears as the sign off visarga; and the pṛishṭha-mātrā of the following [Sanskrit] appears as a daṇḍa.
[8] The superscript of the bracketed letter has come out only in the form of traces, as also the sign of the mātrā of the first akshara.
[9] The intended reading may have been From the other inscription we know that Dhārāvarsha’s queen was श्रृंगारदेवी. See Nos. 70 and No, v. 3.
[10] As stated above, this line was engraved later and has no connection with the main record.
[11] Now a Superintending Archaeologist, in the Archaeological Survey of India.

..................CORPUS INSCRIPTIONUM INDICARUM
VOL.VII ......................................................................PLATE LXXVIII
COPPER-PLATE INSCRIPTION OF THE PARAMARAS OF CHANDRAVATI:
................(FRAGMENTARY AND UNDATED)

images/copperplateinscriptionoftheparamarasofchandravati

<< - 37 Page

>
>