INSCRIPTIONS OF THE PARAMARAS OF MALWA
some Brāhmin-settlements founded by persons whose names are given in the beginning. UttaraKuru-Dēśa (1.24) is again well known. Śravaṇabhadra (11, 28 and 39), which is mentioned also
in the Tilakavāḍā grant of Bhōja,[1] may be somewhere near Kanauj in North India. Khēṭaka.
(1.32), which is mentioned in the first two of our grants, is evidently Kheḍā or Kairā in Gujarāt.
Nāndipura, which is stated to have been in Lāṭa country (1. 38), has been identified with the
modern Nāndoḍ on the Narmadā. The name Asureśa-maṇḍala (1. 19) I am tempted to identify
with a Hūṇa locality, and I also find that the name of the modern village Usārā in the Bhānpurā
parganā of the Mandsaur District sounds somewhat similar to it. But the village Avivā (1.20),
as stated to have been included in it, I am unable to identify. In course of his identifying most of
the places, Dikshit states that ‘places like Kharjurikā, Sopura, Dapura, Ānoha, Avivā and Rājakīya
grāma, may be found in the neighbourhood or within the province of Mālwā,[2] And following
this remark, I could trace out a number of villages resembling these names throughout Mālwā ;
one of them lying about 10 kms. to the east of the find-spot of the plates bears the complete
name Khajūriā-Parmār. The name Dapura sounds like Devar, about 3 kms. south of Narwal
(now in the Dēwās District). Rājakīyagrāma may perhaps have been the modern village Rānevās,
about 5 kms. west of Narwal, or Rāipuryā in the Bhānpurā parganā of the Mandsaur District,
which also shows a village of the name of Sopuryā. The remarks suggesting the location of places
in Mālwā are all tentative, based only on the resemblance in names; but it is certain that some
of them are to be found in the District of Ujjain and some others in that of Mandsaur, in which
lie respectively the find-spot and the gift village, as proposed by me. It is interesting to note
here that of all the regions from which Brāhmaṇas are stated to have migrated to Mālwā at the
time when the present grant was issued, Bengal occupies the first place, giving the second or the
third place to the United Provinces, Gujarāt and some other regions. It is also wroth noting
that all the Brāhmaṇas hailing from Bengal are Sāmavēdins belonging to its Chhāndōgya-śākhā.
In the end we may reproduce the list of the Brāhmaṇa donees, in a tabular from, as given
by K. N. Dikshit in his article in the Ep. Indica, op. cit., pp. 105-06 :––
Table showing the Brāhmaṇa donees of the Gaonrī Plates of Vākpati Muñja ; V.S. 1038.
Serial Name of Father’s name Original place Vēda & śākhā Gōtra & .....Parts of
No. Donee .Pravara .....village
granted |
1 |
Sarvānanda |
Dīkshita Lōkānanda |
Kaṇōpā in Magadha |
Ṙigvēda,Bahvṛicha Sāmavēd |
Sāṁkṛitya |
3 |
8 |
2 |
Mūlasthāna |
Brahmapaṇḍita |
Ayaka in Madhyadēśa |
Chhāndōgya Yajurvēda, |
Vasishṭha |
3 |
3 |
3 |
Lōhiṇa |
Īśvara |
Kāvaḍa |
mādhyandina |
Gautama |
3 |
3 |
4 |
Chandrāditya |
Pītavāsa |
Chauramba |
Sāmavēda, Chhāndōgya |
Śāḍilya |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Śābara |
Raṇāditya |
Kulāñchā |
Do |
Do |
3 |
2 |
6 |
Śābara Lōhapa |
Vāsudēva |
Avivā in Asurēśamaṇḍala |
Do |
Vatsa |
5 |
4 |
7 |
Dōnāka |
Gōśaraṇa |
Vilvagavāsa in Dakshiṇa Rāḍha |
Do |
Pārāśara |
52 |
|
8 |
Anantāditya |
Surāditya |
Khaḍupallikā |
Yajurvēda, VājiMādhyandina |
Maudgalya |
3 |
2 |
9 |
Vāmanasvāmin |
Dīkshita Hari |
Pauṇḍarika in Uttarakula |
Sāmavēda,Chhāndōga |
Gārgya |
5 |
3 |
10 |
Ātuka |
Risiula |
Umvarāchara |
Yajurvēda, Vājimādhyandina |
Agastya |
3 |
1 |
11 |
Purushōttama |
Līhā |
? in Madhyadēśa |
Do |
Maitrēya |
3 |
4 |
12 |
Gōvindasvāmin |
Dēvasvāmin |
Madhupālikā |
Sāmavēda, Chhāndoga |
Kāśyapa |
3 |
3 |
13 |
Sihaṭa |
Mitrānanda |
Śravaṇabhadra |
Ṛigvēda. Bahvṛicha Chhāndōgya |
Vatsa |
5 |
4 |
14 |
Śaṅkara |
Dēvāditya |
Dardurikā in Sāvathikā |
Sāmavēda, Chhāndōgya |
Bhārgava |
3 |
2 |
15 |
Madhumathana |
Achala |
Mitilapāṭaka in Sāvathikadēśa |
Yajurvēda, Vājimādhyandina |
Parāśsara |
3 |
2 |
16 |
Svayaṁtapa |
Śrīnivāsa |
Khēḍāpālikā |
Do |
Mauni |
3 |
3 |
17 |
Nēnaiyaka |
Madhu |
Khēṭaka |
Ṛigvēda, Bahvṛicha |
Bhāradvāja |
3 |
4 |
18 |
Jāmaṭa |
Vishṇu |
Anōhā |
Yajurvēda, Vājimādhyandina |
Bhārgava |
3 |
2 |
19 |
Dēdāka |
Do |
Do |
Do |
Do |
3 |
2 |
20 |
Āvasthika ....Śarvadēva |
Lōhaṭa |
Sōpura |
Sāmavēda, Kauthuma |
Śāṇḍilya |
3 |
2 |
21 |
Varāha |
Śrīdhara |
Kharjūrikā |
Sāmavēda, Chhāndōgya |
Māhula |
3 |
4 |
22 |
Āśāditya |
Mahula |
Dapura |
Rigvēda, Bahvṛicha |
Vārāha |
3 |
3 |
23 |
Bhāila |
Hari |
? in Lāṭadēśa |
Yajurvēda Vājimādhyandina |
Kāśyapa |
3 |
1 |
24 |
Dēvāditya |
Līlāditya |
Rājakīyagrāma |
Sāmavēda Chhāndōgya |
Kāśyapa |
3 |
1 |
25 |
Muṁjāla |
īśvara |
Nāndipura in Lāṭadeśa |
Yajurvēda, Vājimādhyandina |
Vatsa |
5 |
2 |
26 |
Amātta |
Guṇākara |
Śravaṇabhadra |
Do |
Bhāradvāja |
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
.........Total |
|
78 |
________________________________________________________________________________________
No. 15, 1.4, below.
As also remarked in a foot-note in the text, this gōtra has three pravaras and not five (K.N.D.)
|