South Indian Inscriptions - Inscriptions collected during the year 1908-09 @ whatisindia.com

Contents
Introduction
Contents
List of Plates
Addenda Et Corrigenda
Images
EDITION AND TEXTS
Inscriptions of the Paramaras of Malwa
Inscriptions of the paramaras of chandravati
Inscriptions of the paramaras of Vagada
Inscriptions of the Paramaras of Bhinmal
An Inscription of the Paramaras of Jalor
Other South-Indian Inscriptions
Volume 1	Volume 2
Volume 3	Vol. 4 - 8
Volume 9	Volume 10
Volume 11	Volume 12
Volume 13	Volume 14
Volume 15	Volume 16
Volume 17	Volume 18
Volume 19	Volume 20
Volume 22 Part 1	Volume 22 Part 2
Volume 23	Volume 24
Volume 26	Volume 27
Tiruvarur	Darasuram
Konerirajapuram	Tanjavur
Annual Reports 1935-1944	Annual Reports 1945- 1947
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2	Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1	Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2
Epigraphica Indica	Epigraphia Indica Volume 3
Epigraphia Indica Volume 4	Epigraphia Indica Volume 6
Epigraphia Indica Volume 7	Epigraphia Indica Volume 8
Epigraphia Indica Volume 27	Epigraphia Indica Volume 29
Epigraphia Indica Volume 30	Epigraphia Indica Volume 31
Epigraphia Indica Volume 32	Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2
Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2	Vākāṭakas Volume 5
Early Gupta Inscriptions
Archaeological Links
Archaeological-Survey of India
Pudukkottai

INSCRIPTION OF THE PARAMARAS OF JALOR

TEXT [1]
[Metres : Verses 1 and 3 Āryā ; v. 2 Śārdūlavikrīḍita ; vv. 4-5 Anushṭubh].

images/334

[1] From ink-impressions.
[2] Expressed by a symbol.
[3] प is changed to पा for the sake of the metre.
[4] The sandhi is not made here, as required by rules.
[5] Reu : स्वयं(यम्)
[6] The visarga shows three dots here.
[7] After the third letter in this line there is a vacant space for two letters. The figures of speech in this verse leave no doubt to conclude that Dhārāvarsha was the son of Vijjala.
[8] Daksha was born of one who had himself his birth in a lotus, i.e., Brahmā.
[9] Probably some other letter was originally formed here. The words राज्ञी and पत्नी are to be changed to the third case, to be connected with कृतम् in the next line.
[10] The formation of this letters is rather peculiar.
[11] Some traces below show that at least one more line was there, originally, probably giving the name of the poet and the engraver.

<< -2 Page

Home Page