South Indian Inscriptions - Inscriptions collected during the year 1908-09 @ whatisindia.com

Contents
Introduction
Contents
List of Plates
Addenda Et Corrigenda
Images
EDITION AND TEXTS
Inscriptions of the Paramaras of Malwa
Inscriptions of the paramaras of chandravati
Inscriptions of the paramaras of Vagada
Inscriptions of the Paramaras of Bhinmal
An Inscription of the Paramaras of Jalor
Other South-Indian Inscriptions
Volume 1	Volume 2
Volume 3	Vol. 4 - 8
Volume 9	Volume 10
Volume 11	Volume 12
Volume 13	Volume 14
Volume 15	Volume 16
Volume 17	Volume 18
Volume 19	Volume 20
Volume 22 Part 1	Volume 22 Part 2
Volume 23	Volume 24
Volume 26	Volume 27
Tiruvarur	Darasuram
Konerirajapuram	Tanjavur
Annual Reports 1935-1944	Annual Reports 1945- 1947
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2	Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1	Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2
Epigraphica Indica	Epigraphia Indica Volume 3
Epigraphia Indica Volume 4	Epigraphia Indica Volume 6
Epigraphia Indica Volume 7	Epigraphia Indica Volume 8
Epigraphia Indica Volume 27	Epigraphia Indica Volume 29
Epigraphia Indica Volume 30	Epigraphia Indica Volume 31
Epigraphia Indica Volume 32	Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2
Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2	Vākāṭakas Volume 5
Early Gupta Inscriptions
Archaeological Links
Archaeological-Survey of India
Pudukkottai

INSCRIPTIONS OF THE PARAMARAS OF MALWA

it may likely have been the modern Rālēgaōn which is situated about 40 kms. due east of Yeotmāl, the headquarters of a district and the provenance of the inscription of Śaka 1034 or 1112 A.C. and of the time of Lakshmīvarman’s brother Jagaddēva, [1] The place is almost double of this distance due north-west of Chāndā (Chāhuṇḍa), the capital town of Jagaddēva. In passing it may be noted here that Rālā is mentioned as a maṇḍala in a fragmentary stone inscription found by F. E. Hall at Bhilsā (modern Vidishā). [2] The name of the maṇḍala mentioned in 1. 14 is lost and hence we are unable to identify it.

TEXT [3]
First Side

images/140

Second Side

images/140a

Third Side

images/140b

_________________

[1] Above, No. 28.
[2] J.A.S.B., Vol. XXXI, p. 111.
[3] From impressions.
[4] Expressed by a symbol.
[5] The sign of the superscript on ज is faintly visible. The whole expression to be amended to -जयोभ्यु-.
[6] The sign of punctuation is superfluous; and the word has to be amended to प्रक्रिया, meaning ‘the bearing of royal insignia’.
[7] The last but one letter in this line is not well engraved and also mutilated. It does not give any intelligible sense. Possibly the whole word has to be read as प्रख्यातः as suggested by Katare, or प्र[सा*]दात्.
[8] This is as read by Katare. It is also possible that the whole word may have been भ्रातृज, as traces indicate. The letter त before कनिष्ठ is engraved as त्क.
[9] The punctuation mark is superfluous. Moreover, the intended sense is unintelligible to me. Katare reads संव (व) ध्य in the sense of matrimonially connected, but the second letter is clearly द and not व, and the use of च between the two words to be connected presents a difficulty here if we agree with him.
[10] This appears to be a contraction of राणक .
[11] The aksharas giving the name of the maṇḍala are mutilated beyond recognition.
[12] As stated above, the fragmentary state of the inscription does not enable us to have any sense out of the last four lines. It is also surprising that the poet’s name is mentioned before this portion and not in the end, as is usually the case.

..................CORPUS INSCRIPTIONUM INDICARUM
VOL.VII .................................................................................PLATE XLI
BHOPAL PILLAR INSCRIPTION OF THE TIME OF MAHAKUMARA LAKSHMIVARMAN : ( UNDATED)

images/bhopalpillarinscriptionofthetimeofmahakumaralakshmivarman

images/bhopalpillarinscriptionofthetimeofmahakumaralakshmivarman1

<< -139 Page

Page 141 - >>

Home Page