The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Addenda Et Corrigenda

Images

EDITION AND TEXTS

Inscriptions of the Paramaras of Malwa

Inscriptions of the paramaras of chandravati

Inscriptions of the paramaras of Vagada

Inscriptions of the Paramaras of Bhinmal

An Inscription of the Paramaras of Jalor

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

INSCRIPTIONS OF THE PARAMARAS OF MALWA

MĀNDHĀTĀ COPPER-PLATE INSCRIPTION OF THE TIME JAYAVARMAN



images/219

>

Second Plate : First Side

images/219a

_________________________________________________________________


[1] Obeisance to Dharma and the deities, as it appears first in the Māndhātā grant of Dēvapāla (No. 51 ).
[2] Here is a reference to the legend which states that Vishṇu became the arrow with which Śiva killed the demon Tripura. See Saura-Purāṇa, 35, 16 ; and Śiva-Purāṇa(Jñāna-Saṁhitā) as pointed out by Dr. Sircar. Also see Mbh., Drōṇa Parva, Adhyāya 202, vv. 71-78 (Chitraśālā Press edn.). This idea occurs also in No. 29, v. 3, above, and also in the Śivamahimnastōtra, v. 18.
[3] This is a beautiful description of ashṭamūrti-Śiva, reminding us of the first stanza of Kālidāsa’s Abhi- jñāna-Śākuntala.
[4] Sircar corrects this akshara to –mnā ; but as an adjective of paśupatēḥ, it should be in the sixth case. It may also be stated here that Ōṁkāra is the name of the deity and Māndhātā of the place.
[5] The akshara ri which was first engraved here was erased later on as it was repeated by mistake at the beginning of the next line ; but the sign of the original is still visible.
[ 6] Originally क्तौ was engraved and then corrected, but the vertical which has been erased is still visible.Vishṇu. See Mark. Purāṇa (Bibliotheca Ind. edn.), Canto LXXXI.
[7] While composing this verse the poet had in his mind the description of the goddess Sarasvatī as in the Naishadhīya-Charita of Śrīharsha, X, 73 ff.
[8] Originally va, later on corrected to ya.
[9] The sign for medial ā was first attached to the letter rmma, and was subsequently scored off by two horizontal strokes.
[10] This daṇḍa was subsequently engraved just above the line where it is required, and the preceding sign of visarga was also inserted later on. Similar cases, which are found below on the plate, are not noted separately.
[11] The letter in the brackets was first engraved as va and was corrected subsequently.
[12] A redundant र was originally engraved before र्षो and was scored off by two horizontal strokes later on.

<< - 218 Page

>
>