INSCRIPTIONS OF THE PARAMARAS OF MALWA
ḌONGARGĀON STONE INSCRIPTION OF THE TIME OF JAGADDEVA
enemies who were then invading the Paramāra kingdom in the last days of Bhōja ; and this we
propose to examine here in detail.
...
As for the relationship of Udayāditya with Bhōja, we find that some of the Paramāra
records describe the former of these rulers as meditating on the feet of the latter ; and the
Udaypur praśasti, which is explicit in stating the relationship of each of the princes mentioned
in it with his predecessor, simply says that Bhōja was followed on the throne by Udayāditya.
[1]
The Nagpur Museum stone inscription of Naravarman introduces Udayāditya as a bandhu of
Bhōjadēva ;
[2]
and as the word bandhu signifies ‘a relative in general’, Kielhorn was right in
taking the word as such,
[3]
and this view has been adopted by scholars since his time. Thus the
information conveyed by the present inscription in clear words, viz., that Udayāditya was a
brother of Bhōjadēva is indeed valuable ; and in view of this, the altogether different genealogy
of the former of these kings recorded in a sixteenth century inscription mentioning him to
have been the son of Gyātā, grandson of Gōṇḍala and great-grandson of Śūravīra of the Paramāra family,
[4]
has to be rejected. The relationship between the two rulers is stated in very
clear words also in the following inscription, as we shall see presently.
...The other important information furnished by verse 5 of the present inscription concerns
the number of enemies to be three who attacked Mālava, which was rescued by Udayāditya by
defeating them all. As we shall see while editing the Nagpur Museum stone inscription,
[5]
these three enemies were the Kalachuri karṇa (1041-1072 A.C.) and the Chālukya Sōmēśvara II
(1069-1076 A.C.) the son of Āhavamalla-Sōmēśvara I. who had dispatched his general, the
Gaṅga Udayāditya, and his feudatory the Hoysaḷa Eṛeyaṅga. This was the second Kalachuri
invasion of Mālwā, the first being the one which occurred some fifteen years previously when
Bhōja died and his successor Jayasiṁha I succeeded in driving out the allied armies of the Kalachuri Karṇa and the Chaulukya Bhīma with the help of Vikramāditya VI. And how the Kalachuri Karṇa and his allies were routed and turned back by Udayāditya will be described below,
while editing the Nagpur Museum stone inscription.
...The success of Udayāditya in saving the kingdom from the catastrophe made him far-famed
and thus the statement made in verse 6 of the present inscription, though poetic, appears to be
well founded. It says that “the quarters were perforce occupied by his pure fame, the caverns
by his enemies and the directions by the poems of his supplicants.’’ The next verse (No. 7)
introduces Jagaddēva who is stated to have born to Udayāditya in consequence of the latter’s
adoration to Hara whom he requested to give him a son after his heart, though he had some
(more than two).
[6]
The next verse states that the Royal Fortune offered herself to Jagaddēva,
but the renounced this favour, apprehending that to surpass his elder brother would be incurring
a sin.
[7]
This statement would suggest that Jagaddēva who was probably the youngest of all the
brother was appointed by his father as his successor, regarding him his favourite, but he
declined the offer.
...Jagaddēva is not mentioned in any of the Paramāra records except in the present and in
the one that follows ; but his name appears in some of the Hoysaḷa inscriptions describing him
as the king of Mālava.
[8]
On the basis of this statement he was supposed by D.C. Ganguly to
be identical with Lakshmadēva, another son of Udayāditya.
[9]
But the present inscription makes
it clear that he was a different personage from Lakshmadēva and also that he relinquished his
claim to the throne in favour of his brother who was probably Naravarman. This also shows ________________
See Nos. 23, 31, 34 ; and No, v, 21
Below, No. 33, v. 32.
Ep. Ind., Vol. II. p. 192 v. 32.
See D.R. Bhandarkar’s List, No. 134. This inscription is from Udaipur in the Vidishā District and is
dated V.S. 1562. The find-spot of this record made Dr. Ganguly inclined to hold that Udayāditya who
was a scion of the junior branch of the Paramāra house was a feudatory of the Imperial house of Dhārā
and was ruling at Udaipur. See H.P.D., pp. 133-34.
See below, No. 33.
Two of them are known to be Lakshmadēva and Naravarmam ; but the plural in putrēshu shows that
they were at least three.
See text below, n. 9 on next page.
E.g., see Ep. Carn., Vol. II, p. 168.
See H.P.D., p. 142.
|