The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Preface

Contents

List of Maps and Plates

Abbreviations

Additions and Corrections

Images

Introduction

Political History

The Early Silaharas

The Silaharas of North Konkan

The Silaharas of South Konkan

The Silaharas of Kolhapur

Administration

Religious Condition

Social Condition

Economic Condition

Literature

Architecture and Sculpture

Texts And Translations  

Inscriptions of the Silaharas of North Konkan

Inscriptions of The Silaharas of South Konkan

Inscriptions of The Silaharas of kolhapur

APPENDIX I  

Additional Inscriptions of the Silaharas

APPENDIX II  

A contemporary Yadava Inscription

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

ADMINISTRATION

 

ing to the Līlāvatī, its standard weight was 48 rattis or 87.84 grains. Kittel found , in Bellāri and occasionally in Mysore, gold coins called gadyāṇas of the weight of a ruvvi or a farthing . But no coins named kumāra-gadyāṇas are known. Another explanation[1] of the term is that it was the tax of a gadyāṇa required to be paid as a nazarāṇā on the birth of a prince (kumāra) to the ruling king. [1] But such a nazarāṇā would be leviable on rare occasions and, therefore, the income from it would be insignificant. There is, therefore, no point in specially mentioning it in land-grants. A third interpretation [2] proposed is that the kumāra-gadyāṇa was a tax imposed on what is known as kumrī cultivation which is in vogue in some places such as hill areas and forest tracts. But this explanation also is not plausible; for the tax was levied both in North and South India and on all villages whether they lay in the hilly and forest tracts or not. In one record a similar term, viz., kumāradrōṇa [3] is found used, which shows that the tax was paid in the form of a coin in some regions and in that of a grain-measure like drōṇa in some others. It seems that the tax was levied for a prince, i.e. for his maintenance, education etc. While the other taxes were paid to the rājan (king) for the maintenance of law and order and for the execution of other royal duties, this tax (kumāra -gadyāṇa) was levied and paid in the name of the Crown-prince. [4]

>
_______________________

[1] J.N.S.I., Vol. VII, pp. 20 f.
[2] Ep. Carn., Vol. X, pp. 86 f.
[3] Ep. Ind., Vol. XXXIII, pp. 244-45.
[4] Ghoshal thinks that the tax was on behalf of the royal prince at the rate of so much per gadyāṇa. Lallanji Gopal says that the tax was one gadyāṇa per family annually. He says thfat though kumāra means a prince, the tax was way of the present to the members of a royal family in general. See his Economic Life of Northern India, A.D. 700-1200, pp. 52 f.

 

<< - 10 Page

 

>
>