The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Preface

Contents

List of Maps and Plates

Abbreviations

Additions and Corrections

Images

Introduction

Political History

The Early Silaharas

The Silaharas of North Konkan

The Silaharas of South Konkan

The Silaharas of Kolhapur

Administration

Religious Condition

Social Condition

Economic Condition

Literature

Architecture and Sculpture

Texts And Translations  

Inscriptions of the Silaharas of North Konkan

Inscriptions of The Silaharas of South Konkan

Inscriptions of The Silaharas of kolhapur

APPENDIX I  

Additional Inscriptions of the Silaharas

APPENDIX II  

A contemporary Yadava Inscription

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

ECONOMIC CONDITION

 

Malwā, Gujarāt and Mārvāḍ also, where no such foreign currency is likely to have been in circulation. The Lēkhapaddhati gives the coin-name as pāraupatha or pārupathaka, which seems to connect it with some locality as patha or pathaka was a territorial sub-division[1] From the Purātanaprabbandhasaṅgraha we learn that pōruthaka drammas were in circulation in the kingdom of Jālor near Bhinmāl. It has, therefore, been suggested that they may have received this name from that place just as elsewhere drammas of Bhillamāla are referred to.[2] As for the value of a pōrutha dramma the Purātanaprabandhasaṅgraha tells us that it was equivalent to 8 ordinary drammas. This high value of these drammas may have been due to the purity of their silver rather than to their size or weight.

.. As stated above, both the ordinary and the pōrutha drammas were in circulation in North Koṅkaṇ. It is noteworthy in this connection that a pot found in North Koṅkaṇ many years ago contained both the Gadhiyā and Kshatrapa coins.[3] Of these, the Gadhiyā coins were probably of Chhittarāja or some other ruler of the family, and the Kshatrapa coins were the so called porutha drammas. They were so called because they were believed to have been struck by Pārthian (actually Śaka) kings.

>

.. In the excavations at Brahmapurī, a suburb of Kolhāpur on the bank of the Pañchagaṅgā, two small gold coins were found.[4] They are round in Shape and have on the obverse a trident with a handle, the forks of which enclose the sun and the moon, and on the reverse the figure of a standing Garuḍa, with legs bent, carrying a flying banner in the left hand and a serpent in the right. Their weight is 22.5 grains. As the Śilāhāras were ruling at Kolhāpur and had the Garuda for their ensign, these coins apparently belong to them. It is noteworthy that the seal of the Miraj plates of Mārasiṁha shows a similar trident. As the coins are uninscribed, the Śilāhāra king who struck them cannot be identified.

.. The coins mentioned in the Silahara inscriptions from the Kolhapur region are panam and bīsige.[5] The panam or phanam was a tiny coin of gold, weighing five or six grains. Bīsige probably represents Sanskrit viṁśōpaka or Marāṭhī visovā and may have been in value one twentieth of the phanam.
_______________________

[1] Lekhapaddhati, p. 43.
[2] J.N.S.I., Vol. XII, p. 201.
[3] Bom. Gaz. (Nāsik Dist.), (old ed.), p. 617, n. 2.
[4] J.N.S.I., Vol. XIV, pp. 15-16.
[5] No. 49, line 28.

 

<< - 4 Page

 

>
>