The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Preface

Contents

List of Maps and Plates

Abbreviations

Additions and Corrections

Images

Introduction

Political History

The Early Silaharas

The Silaharas of North Konkan

The Silaharas of South Konkan

The Silaharas of Kolhapur

Administration

Religious Condition

Social Condition

Economic Condition

Literature

Architecture and Sculpture

Texts And Translations  

Inscriptions of the Silaharas of North Konkan

Inscriptions of The Silaharas of South Konkan

Inscriptions of The Silaharas of kolhapur

APPENDIX I  

Additional Inscriptions of the Silaharas

APPENDIX II  

A contemporary Yadava Inscription

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

INSCRIPTIONS OF THE SILAHARAS OF KOLHAPUR

 

the cyclic year being Dundubhi. As in several other records of the Śilāhāras of Kolhāpur, the Śaka year cited here has to be taken as current in order that it should correspond to the cyclic year Dundubhi according to the southern system. The sixth tithi of the bright fortnight of Bhādrapada in this current Śaka year 1065 ended 13 h. after mean sunrise on Friday, the 28th August A.D. 1142.

.. The present inscription records certain other gifts made by two officers of the Śilāhāra king Vijayāditya who were in charge of the District of Miriñje[2], viz. Bhāyipayya Nāyaka, who is described as Mahāpradhāna and the Controller of Customs, and Mallapayya Nāyaka, who was the Superintendent of Markets, for the worship of the same god Mādhavēśvara at Seḍambāḷ, and the provision of food to the ascetics living in the maṭha of the temple. The gifts consisted of certain taxes levied on the shops of oilmen, grain-merchants, areca-nut-sellers etc. in certain part of Sēḍambāḷ. The toll-collectors also were required to contribute some portion of the dues collected by them. The gifts were made after washing the feet of Sōvarāśi Siddhāntidēva who, judging by his name, seems to have belonged to the Pāśupata sect of Śaivism.

.. Thcis second record in the present inscription is dated Thursday, the 14th tithi of the dark fortnight of Māgha, called Śivarātri, in the Śaka year 1066, the cyclic year being Rudhirōdgarin. This Śaka year also, like that of the previous record, has to be taken as current in order to correspond to the cyclic year Rudhirōdgarin. The fourteenth tithi of the dark fortnight of (amānta) Māgha commenced 12 h. 15 m. after mean sunrise on Thursday, the 20th January, A.D. 1144. Though the tithi was not current at sunrise on Thursday it is coupled therewith as it was current at midnight on that day, which was the moment of the Mahā-Śivarātri[3] sacred to the god Śiva (called Mādhavēśvara in the present record).

>

.. The great Trading Corporation of the Vīra-Baṇañjas is described as in a previous inscription (No. 49). It is said to have hailed from Ahichchhatra and is called the lord of the town of Ayyāvaḷe. As stated before, this Ahichchhatra is not identical with the homonymous capital of North Pāñchāla, but was the same as Ayyāvoḷe (modern Aihoḷe in Bijāpur District). The merchants of the Corporation are said to have belonged to eight provinces in the various countries. They are further described here as the residents of thirty-two coastal towns, eighteen cities and sixty-four ghaṭikā-sthānas, but these localities are nowhere specified.

.. As for the place-names mentioned in the present inscription, Ahichchhatra and Ayyāvaḷe have already been identified. Miriñje is modern Miraj, the chief town of the former feudatory State of the same name, now included in the Sānglī District of Mahārāshṭra. Bāge, as suggested by Barnett, may be either Bāgaḍage or Bāgenāḍa-Seventy
_________________

(Continued from previous page)

of the second part, than the 6 that occurs in the same line with the connected tithi. And the corrected tithi Bhādrapada śukla 6, ended, as required, on Friday, 28th August, A.D. 1142, at about 22 gh. 55 p.” (Ind. Ant. Vol. XIX, p.317). This correction of the tithi was also noticed by Kielhorn in his List of Inscriptions of Southern India, No. 322, p. 58. Barnett has referred to this entry in Kielhorn’s List. It is not, therefore, known why he ignored the correction of the tithi first pointed out by Fleet and later adopted by Kielhorn.

[2] This is probably the reason why the stone inscription, though it records gifts made for the worship of the god at Sēḍambāḷ (modern Sheḍbāḷ) and the dues were levied on the commodities sold in the market of that place, was put up at Sēḍambāḷ but at Miriñje (Miraj).
[3] There is a difference of opinion about the proper day for the Śivarātri. Some say that the Śivarātri should be coupled with that day, at the pradōsha (upto two ghaṭikās after sun-set) on which the tithi amānta Māgha va. di. 14 is current. According to others, it falls on that day on which it is current both before and after midnight. See सा (शिवरात्री:) केषुचिद्वचनेषु प्रदोषव्यापिनी ग्राह्योत्युक्तम् । केषुचिन्निशीथव्यापिनी । Nirṇayasindhu, p.157. As the tithi commenced 12 h. 51 m. after mean sunrise on Thursday, it was current both at the prōdosha and at the midnight of that day, and it is, therefore, rightly coupled with that week-day.

 

<< - 50 Page

>
>