The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Preface

Contents

List of Maps and Plates

Abbreviations

Additions and Corrections

Images

Introduction

Political History

The Early Silaharas

The Silaharas of North Konkan

The Silaharas of South Konkan

The Silaharas of Kolhapur

Administration

Religious Condition

Social Condition

Economic Condition

Literature

Architecture and Sculpture

Texts And Translations  

Inscriptions of the Silaharas of North Konkan

Inscriptions of The Silaharas of South Konkan

Inscriptions of The Silaharas of kolhapur

APPENDIX I  

Additional Inscriptions of the Silaharas

APPENDIX II  

A contemporary Yadava Inscription

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

INSCRIPTIONS OF THE SILAHARAS OF SOUTH KONKAN

 

known as Laṅkā or Siṁhala. There are other references also supporting this identification.[1] So the Śilāhāras of South Kōṅkaṇ probably had their original home in the Goā territory.

..Ambhojaśambhu, whose disciple Ātrēya received the present grant, is described as having belonged to the Karkarōṇī branch of the Mattamayūra clan. Karkarōṇī has not been identified, but Mattamayūra was a celebrated centre of Śaivism in that period.[2] The Āchāryas of this place belonged to the Śaiva, as distinguished from the Pāśupata, school of Śaivism. Their names, like that of Ambhōjaśambhu of the present plates, ended in śiva or ṡambhu as those of the Pāśupatas ended in rāśi. Mattamayūra was probably the ancient name of modern Kadwāhā in Central India, where there are remains of monas- trey and not less than fourteen Brāhmaṇical temples, all belonging to the 10th century A.D. As Mr. Garde, Director of the Archaeological Survey, Gwalior State, has remarked, ‘such a large group of temples is found at no other single place in the Gwalior State. Kadwāhā thus deserves to be styled the Khajurāhō or Bhuvanēśvara of Gwālior. Ambhōjaśambhu thus seems to have come to South Kōṅkaṇ from that distant place in Central India. We have other instances of the Āchāryas of the Mattamayūra clan having gone to even farther places for the propagation of their sect.

.. Of the localities mentioned in the present plates, Siṁhala has already been identified with the Gōa island. Chandrapura, the chief town in the Chandramaṇdala, is Chāndor on the Parodā river, south of Goā. Chēmūlya is Chaul in the Kolābā district, about 30 miles south of Bombay. Balipattana is probably the ancient name of modern Khārepāṭaṇ. Most of the donated villages and the places forming their boundaries cannot be identified now in the Ratnāgiri District, but Gavahaṇa may be Gavhāṇe in the Dēvgaḍ tālukā, and Vyaṅgarula, modern Vēṅgurlē, the chief town of the Vēngurle mahāl of the Ratnāgiri District.

>

TEXT[3]
First Plate

images/164

_____________________________________________________

[1] Ep. Ind., Vol. XIII, p. 369. Some Śilāhāra kings assumed the biruda Niś-śaṅka-Laṅkēśvara evidently to indicate their conquest of the Goā territory.
[2] See C.I.I., Vol. IV, Introd. pp. cli f.
[3] From the plates facing pp. 300-301 in Ep. Ind., Vol. III.
[4] Expressed by a symbol. Kielhorn takes this as signifying ओम्, but this would involve repetition. See also No. 28, line 1, above, where the word is actually engraved.
[5] Elsewhere the expression is हेलोल्लासित as pointed out by Kielhorn. See the Śārṅgadharapaddhati, verse 1087. दण्डचरण is used here in the sense of चरणदण्ड.
[6] Metre : Śārdūlavikrīḍita.
[7] This danḍa is unnecessary.
[8] Metre of verses 2 and 3 : Sragdhara.

 

<< - 11 Page

>
>