The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Preface

Contents

List of Maps and Plates

Abbreviations

Additions and Corrections

Images

Introduction

Political History

The Early Silaharas

The Silaharas of North Konkan

The Silaharas of South Konkan

The Silaharas of Kolhapur

Administration

Religious Condition

Social Condition

Economic Condition

Literature

Architecture and Sculpture

Texts And Translations  

Inscriptions of the Silaharas of North Konkan

Inscriptions of The Silaharas of South Konkan

Inscriptions of The Silaharas of kolhapur

APPENDIX I  

Additional Inscriptions of the Silaharas

APPENDIX II  

A contemporary Yadava Inscription

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

LITERATURE

 

notwithstanding his insignificant, unstable and slight merits, even as the sun treats a lotus which has similar filaments.

.. That dull-witted Sōḍḍhala, with the ambition of a poet, has composed this UdavaSundarī-kathā, which, by its insignificant literary merits, has secured a place in the inaccessible realm of poetry.

.. In this temple of Sarasvatī, Bāṇa, the foremost among poets, carefully listened to it out of sympathy for the poet’s labour, when he was freed from the pangs of a curse. He gave it a place in his heart and bestowed his praise on it.)

.. After praising and worshipping the goddess Sarasvatī, Sōḍḍhala returned to the capital. There his prabandha was read and praised by poets such as the Śvetāmbara Jaina Mahākavi Chandanāchārya, the author of the kathā Aśokavatī, the Śīghrakavī Vijayasiṁhāchārya, the author of the Khaḍgakāvya, who had been honoured with the title of Khaḍgāchārya by (the Śilāhāra king) Nāgārjuna, the Digambarāchārya Mahākīrti, who was conversant with three languages, and Indra, the author of the Champūkāvya Ratnamañjarī. Some days later, King Mummuṇi of Kōṅkaṇa, sent his poet friend Madhurasāhāra, who was proficient in three languages, to call Sōḍḍhala to his court. He met Sōḍḍhala and said to him, “King Mummuṇi has heard that you have composed a kathā named Udayasundarī, which you read out to Bāṇa in a temple of Sarasvatī in a lonely forest, and that it was praised by him. King Mummuṇi’s friend Vatsarāja, king of Lāṭa, saw the praśasti written by you in the temple of Sarasvatī while on his way from Śūrpāraka to his capital. He thought that you had written the kathā with reference to the Āryā he had uttered in his court and called you to meet him and read your work. He told king Mummuṇi about it and about the praise bestowed on it by Bāṇa. Having heard that marvellous account, king Mummuṇi has sent me to fetch you.” When Sōḍḍhala accompanied him to the court of Mummuṇi, the latter asked him to read out the work to him. He then honoured Sōḍḍhala with munificent gifts. All courtiers congratulated him. His poet friends embraced him. All this gave him more joy than the overlordship of the three worlds. Sōḍḍhala has concluded his work with a ślōka in praise of God Siva.

>

..The date of Sōḍḍhala does not present any difficulty. He enjoyed the patronage of the three Śilāhāra kings Chhittarāja, Nāgārjuna and Mummuṇi. The earliest known date of Chhittarāja is A.D. 1024[1] and the latest of Mummuṇi is A.D. 1060.[2] So Sōḍḍhala may have stayed at the Śilāhāra court from circa A.D. 1030 to A.D. 1050. He had also the support of the Chaulukya kings of Lāṭa. The first three princes of this family named below have been mentioned in the Udayasundarikatha :

Gōggirāja |
Kīrtirāja (known date A.D. 1018)[3]
|
Vatsarāja
|
(Trilōchanapāla) (known date A.D. 1051)(4)

.. Goggirāja’s son Gaṅgādhara and Kīrtirāja’s son Siṁharāja have also been mentioned in the Udayasundrīkathā, but they did not come to the throne. No inscriptions of Vatsarāja have been discovered, but from the grants of his father and his son he seems to have flourished in the period circa A.D. 1030-1050. As described by Sōḍḍhala, he was a contemporary of the Śilāhāra king Mummuṇirāja. Sōḍḍhala’s date has thus been corroborated by the details given in the Udayasundrīkatha.
_____________________________

[1] See the date of No. 61.
[2] No. 17, line 1.
[3] Bhandarkar’s List of Northern Inscriptions, No. 1088.
[4] Ibid., No. 1092. He is not mentioned in the Udayasundarikatha.

 

<< - 4 Page

>
>