The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Preface

Contents

List of Maps and Plates

Abbreviations

Additions and Corrections

Images

Introduction

Political History

The Early Silaharas

The Silaharas of North Konkan

The Silaharas of South Konkan

The Silaharas of Kolhapur

Administration

Religious Condition

Social Condition

Economic Condition

Literature

Architecture and Sculpture

Texts And Translations  

Inscriptions of the Silaharas of North Konkan

Inscriptions of The Silaharas of South Konkan

Inscriptions of The Silaharas of kolhapur

APPENDIX I  

Additional Inscriptions of the Silaharas

APPENDIX II  

A contemporary Yadava Inscription

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

THE EARLY SILAHARAS

 

of Kanakāmara (11 th cen. A.D.)[1] give the following story about Karakaṇḍa, a prince of the Aṅga country.

.. After consolidating his kingdom in the north, Karakaṇḍa undertook an expedition for the conquest of southern countries. In the course of his digvijaya he came to Tērapura or Tērāpura, where he came to know about a wonderful cave on the adjoining hill. He visited the cave and found an image of Pārśvanātha therein. He found another image of the same Tīrthaṅkara in an ant-hill on the top the same hill. He got the latter removed to the old cave.[2] On inquiry he learned that the cave had been excavated by two Vidyādhara princes Nīla and Mahānīla, who originally belonged to the Himālayas but had leave their country, being pressed by their enemies. They came to Tērapura, where they built a large kingdom. They were converted to Jainism by a Jaina Muni. They had excavated that cave and installed the image of Pārśvanātha therein. Later, Karakaṇḍa himself got two[3] (or three)[4] caves excavated in the name of himself, his son on the same hill.

.. This account seems to have a historical basis. The caves described by Harishēṇa and Kanakāmara are evidently those near Dhārāśiva (now called Osmānābād), twelve miles south-west of Ter. There are now six Jaina caves on the slope of the hill near Osmānābād, four on one side, and two on the opposite. Of them, Cave No. 2 is a big one with its hall measuring 95 ft. at the back and 79 ft. in front, with a depth of 80 ft. The hall has eight cells in each side wall, and six more at the back, three being on each side of the shrine. The latter has a large image of Pārśvanātha in the padmāsana posture, with a serpent spreading its seven hoods on his head. On his throne there appear two deer on each side with an indistinct object between them, which appears to be a dharmachakra. There is a distinct dharmachakra on the seat of a similar image of Pārśvanātha in Cave No. 3.[5] Burgess identified these as Jaina caves and assigned them to the middle of the seventh century A.D.[6] They are evidently the caves described by the aforementioned Jaina authors in their works.

>

.. Though one may not accept the legendary account of these caves given in the two Jaina works in full, the statement that the large Pārśvanātha cave (Cave No. 2) was excavated by the Vidyādharas may have had a basis in fact. As the Śilāhāras trace their descent from the Vidyādhara Jīmūtavāhana, it is not unlikely that they got the cave excavated when they were ruling at Tagara in the seventh cen. A.D., probably as feudatories of the Early Chālukyas. It may, again, be noted that Chāmuḍarāja, a feudatory of the Śilāhāras of North Koṅkaṇ who took pride in having hailed from Tagara, assumed the birudas Tribhuvana-Nīla, and that his father Vijjarāṇaka had the biruda of Āhava-Nīla.[7] These birudas evidently reflect the tradition about the caves near Dhārāśiva having been excavated by the Vidyādhara princes Nīla and Mahānila.
_____________

[1] Karakaṇḍachariu, parichhēdas IV and V.
[2] It is probably the loose image of Pārśvanātha in the cistern cell of Cave No. 2.
[3] Karakaṇḍachariu, V, 13.
[4] Bṛihatkathākōśa, 56, 414.
[5] M. K. Dhavalikar has recently suggested that Cave No. 2 was originally a Buddhist cave. He takes the large image in it as that of the Buddha. He draws attention to the symbol of the dharmachakra flanked by two deer on either side on the lion seat. As for the serpent hoods on the head of the image, he points out that similar hoods appear on the head of several images of the Buddha found at Nāgārjunakoṇḍa. In view of the resemblance of this cave to the Mahāyāna caves Nos. XVI and XVII at Ajaṇṭā he ascribes this cave to the 5th cen. A.D. (see J.A.S. Bom. New Series, Vols. XIX-XX, pp. 183 f.; J.I.H., Vol. XLVI, pp. 405 f.). These are not, however, very cogent arguments. The dharmachakra is seen on the pedestal of several Jaina Tīrthaṅkaras. The serpent-hoods were a distinct emblem of Pārśvanātha. They appear on the Buddha’s head only in connection with the story of Muchalinda. For a full discussion of They appear see our Literary and Historical Studies in Indology, pp. 220 f.
[6] A.S.W.I., Vol. III, p. 11.
[7] No. 12, lines 9 and 30.

 

<< - 4 Page

>
>