The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Preface

Contents

List of Maps and Plates

Abbreviations

Additions and Corrections

Images

Introduction

Political History

The Early Silaharas

The Silaharas of North Konkan

The Silaharas of South Konkan

The Silaharas of Kolhapur

Administration

Religious Condition

Social Condition

Economic Condition

Literature

Architecture and Sculpture

Texts And Translations  

Inscriptions of the Silaharas of North Konkan

Inscriptions of The Silaharas of South Konkan

Inscriptions of The Silaharas of kolhapur

APPENDIX I  

Additional Inscriptions of the Silaharas

APPENDIX II  

A contemporary Yadava Inscription

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

THE SILAHARAS OF KOLHAPUR

 

..The history of this country after the downfall of the Early Chālikyas is obscure. It was plainly included in the empire of the Later Rāshṭrakūṭas, and was probably placed under the rule of a feudatory family. Its capital in those days was probably Karahaṭa, modern Karhāḍ in the Sātāra District. Some later kings of the Sinda family in Karnāṭaka describe themselves in their grants as Karahāṭa-pura-var-ādhīśvara (the lords of Karahāṭa, the best of towns)[1]. In accordance with the interptation of similar expressions, this must be taken to mean that they originally hailed from Karahāṭa. No. records of the Sindas have yet been found at Karhāḍ itself, but we have a fragmentary copper-plate grant, found somewhere in Western Mahārāshṭra, of the Sinda king Ādityavarman, who was probably ruling over this country about the middle of the tenth century A.D.[2] Ādityavarman mentions in this grant his grandfather Bhīma and his father Muñja. The plates record the grant of the village Kiṇihikā on the bank of the Indra river, which had a layana-giri in its vicinity. This description suits the village Kinhai on the bank of the Indrāyaṇī river, about 16 miles north by west of Poonā, which has caves in the neighbourhood. Ādiytyavarman had the title of Mahāsāmanta. His grants is dated in the Śaka year 887 (A.D. 965). He evidently owed allegiances to the Rāshṭrakūṭas of Mānyakhēṭa, though he does not mention his suzerain, evidently because the power of the Imperial family was dwindling at this time. He was ruling over the Southern Marāṭhā Country as shown by the above identification of the village granted by him. His capital is not mentioned in that grant, but in view of his descent from the Sinda family and the description in some grants of the Sindas that they originally hailed from karahāṭa, it may have been then at that town. Another copper-plate grant of this family was found at Nārāyaṇgāon near Junnar in the Poonā District.[3] It is still unpublished; but it is said to be dated Śaka 933 (A.D. 1011-12). It shows that the Sindas continued to rule over the Poonā and Sātārā districts till the first quarter of the 11th cen. A.D.

>

..As shown below, the Śilāhāras of Kolhāpur rose just about this time. As no descendants of the aforementioned Sinda king Ādityavarman ruling after A.D. 1012 are known, it would not be wrong to surmise that Jatiga II of the Kolhāpur branch may have overthrown Ādityavarman’s successor and established himself in that country. Karahāṭa may, in that case, have been the first capital of this Śilāhāra family. As no Śilāhāra records have, however, been discovered at Karhāḍ, it is not unlikely that the seat of government was soon shifted to Kolhāpur where several records of the family have been found. Still, this branch of the Śilāhāras is often mentioned as the ruler of Karahāṭa in literature and in the records of some of their contemporaries.[4]

..Like the other two families, this family also traced its descent from Jīmūtavāhana and had the standard of the Golden Eagle. Like the Śilāhāras of North Koṅkaṇ, this family also bore the hereditary title Tagara-puravar-ādhīśvara ‘the lords of Tagara, the best of towns’, but their genealogies do not disclose any points of mutual contact. The family deity of this branch was the goddess Mahālakshmī of Kolhāpur, whose boon they claim in their grants to have secured.[5] Inscriptions mention three capitals of this branch, viz. (1) the hill fort of Khiḷi-
____________

[1]Pali, Sanskrit and Old kanarese Inscriptions, No. 119.
[2] Ep. Ind., Vol. XXV, pp. 164 f.
[3] Ibid., p. 164, n. 1. It seems that this Sinda family then repaired to the Bijāpur District. The Tiḍguṇḍi plates (Bijāpur District) dated in the seventh current year of Vikramāditya VI’s reign (Śaka 1004) mention the following princes-Bhīma-his son Sindarāja-his Muñja. son Muñja was ruling in Śaka 1004 (A.D. 1082-83). Two of these names are like those in the grant of Ādityavaramn. Bhīma is described as the ruler of the country of Pratyaṇḍaka-4000. Karahāṭa also was supposed to contain 4000 villages. Some scholars, But this does not appear to be correct.
[4] P. B. Desai, A History of Karnāṭaka, p. 176.
[5] No. 43, line 30.

 

<< - 2 Page

>
>