The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Preface

Contents

List of Maps and Plates

Abbreviations

Additions and Corrections

Images

Introduction

Political History

The Early Silaharas

The Silaharas of North Konkan

The Silaharas of South Konkan

The Silaharas of Kolhapur

Administration

Religious Condition

Social Condition

Economic Condition

Literature

Architecture and Sculpture

Texts And Translations  

Inscriptions of the Silaharas of North Konkan

Inscriptions of The Silaharas of South Konkan

Inscriptions of The Silaharas of kolhapur

APPENDIX I  

Additional Inscriptions of the Silaharas

APPENDIX II  

A contemporary Yadava Inscription

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

THE SILAHARAS OF NORTH KONKAN

 

the second king of the family, is described as ruling over the whole Kōṅkaṇa headed by Purī. It is also supposed that when the Later Chālukya king Satyāśraya invaded the capital Sthānaka, the Śilāhāra king Aparājita fled from there to his second capital Purī.[1] These are not, however, very cogent reasons to prove that Purī continued to be capital of North Koṅkaṇ in the time of the Śilāhāras. In none of the records has it been mentioned as a place of royal residence. Sthānaka, on the other hand, has been so mentioned in several grants.[2] Purī-Kōṅkaṇa or Purīpṛabhṛiti-Kōṅkaṇa was used to designate North Koṅkaṇ as distinguished from South Koṅkaṅ which was known as Sapta-Kōṅkaṇa. Again, Ranna, while describing Satyāśraya’s invasion of the Śilāhāra king Aparājita’s kingdom, says only that Aparājita fled and entered the sea. Hemmed in by the ocean on one side and the sea of Satyāśraya’s army on the other, Aparājita trembled like an insect on a stick, both the ends of which are on fire. In this description there is no mention of Purī as the place where the Śilāhāra king sought shelter, when his capital (Sthānaka) was stormed by the enemy. Purī is, no doubt, sometimes mentioned in the grants[3] of the Northern Śilāhāras but only as the place from which some Brāhmaṇa donees had hailed. It was previously the capital of the Mauryas, but neither the Chālukyas nor the Śilāhāras who ruled in North Koṅkaṇ thereafter seem to have made it the seat of their government. It is noteworthy that the Kadambas refer to the contemporary Śilāhāra king as the ruler of Ṭhāṇēya,[4] not as that of Purī. Sthanaka seems, therefore, to have been their sole capital throughout this period.

>

.. The genealogy of this branch of the Śilāhāras may be stated as follows with approximate dates :-

images/1

[1] Ind., Ant., Vol. XL, p. 41.
[2] See No. 6, line 59; No. 7, line 55 etc.
[3] See e.g., No. 14, line 152.
[4] See below, p. xv.

 

<< - 3 Page

>
>