The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Altekar, A. S

Bhattasali, N. K

Barua, B. M And Chakravarti, Pulin Behari

Chakravarti, S. N

Chhabra, B. CH

Das Gupta

Desai, P. B

Gai, G. S

Garde, M. B

Ghoshal, R. K

Gupte, Y. R

Kedar Nath Sastri

Khare, G. H

Krishnamacharlu, C. R

Konow, Sten

Lakshminarayan Rao, N

Majumdar, R. C

Master, Alfred

Mirashi, V. V

Mirashi, V. V., And Gupte, Y. R

Narasimhaswami, H. K

Nilakanta Sastri And Venkataramayya, M

Panchamukhi, R. S

Pandeya, L. P

Raghavan, V

Ramadas, G

Sircar, Dines Chandra

Somasekhara Sarma

Subrahmanya Aiyar

Vats, Madho Sarup

Venkataramayya, M

Venkatasubba Ayyar

Vaidyanathan, K. S

Vogel, J. Ph

Index.- By M. Venkataramayya

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

NANDSA YUPA INSCRIPTIONS

form in avatārayitvā for avatārya in A, ll. 1-2 and B, l. 3. If the record has been correctly copied, we have to admit that there is a glaring syntactical irregularity in it. The series of the absolute clauses with which the record commences is left without any subject, nor are they followed by a principal clause, as is usually required. The author of the record adopts the ornate style of Sanskrit prose. There are several similes and metaphors; anuprāsa is not forgotten (B, l. 9), compounds are frequent and some of them are very long (A, l. 4). The record is a praśasti, and it must be acknowledged that the language used is appropriate for the occasion. It gives a vivid idea of the fame and exploits of the hero it commemorates.

Both the records are dated. The date, which is given in numerals as well as in words in inscription A and in numerals only in inscription B, is the full moon day of the month of Chaitra of the Kṛita (i.e. Vikrama) year 282. The corresponding year according to the Christian era would be A.D. 226. The inscriptions are thus the earliest records of the Vikrama era so far known. They are two years earlier than the Barnālā yūpa inscription A, [1] and 11 years anterior to the three yūpa inscriptions of the Maukharis [2] discovered by the present writer at Baḍvā. The inscriptions are primarily intended to commemorate the performance of the Ēkashashṭirātra sacrificial session, which, as its name indicates, used to extend over 61 days. The following constituent sacrifices were offered in this session in the order given below :─

1st day                       Prāyaṇīya sacrifice
2nd day                     Chaturviṁśa sacrifice.
3rd to 20th day,         Three Abhiplava sacrifices,
                                   each lasting for six days.
21st to 26th day,         Pṛishṭhya sacrifice.
27th to 35th day,         Navarātra sacrifice.
36th to 41st day,         Pratilōma Pṛishṭhya sacrifice.
42nd to 47th day,       Abhiplava sacrifice.
48th day,                    Āyu sacrifice.
49th day,                    Gau sacrifice.
50th to 59th day,         Daśarātra sacrifice.
60th day,                    Mahāvrata sacrifice.
61st day,                    Udāyanīya sacrifice.[3]

The Brāhmaṇas and Śrauta Sūtras give several details of each of the above sacrifices, [4] but it is unnecessary to discuss them here. The purpose and significance of the session itself will be discussed later on.

We have so far noticed several yūpa inscriptions, but they usually refer to short sacrifices, The longest sacrificial session, so far discovered from epigraphs, was the Dvādaśarātra-sattra, performed at Īsāpur near Mathurūra in the 28th year of the reign of the emperor Huvishka by Brāhmaṇa Drōṇala.[5] A long sacrificial session, lasting for as many as 61 days, is referred to for the first time in the present records. A sacrificial sattra can be performed only by Brāhmaṇas[6], but the potentate who is eulogised in our records was a Kshatriya. So it is stated that he did not himself perform it, but caused it to be performed ; cf. avatārayitv=ai(avatāry=ai)kashashṭirātram=atisatraṁ, B, ll. 3-4. Not

_______________________________________________

[1] Above. Vol. XXVI, pp. 118 ff.
[2] Above, Vol. XXII, pp. 43 ff.
[3] Pañchavaṁśā Brāhmaṇa, XXIV, 18 ; Kātyāyana Śrauta Sūtra, 25, 18, 17-24.
[4] Kaushitaka Brāhmaṇa, XXIV. 1-3 ; Aitarēya Brāhmaṅa, IV, 10-16 Śāṅkhāyana Śrauva Sūtra, IX, 22 ; etc.
[5] A. R., A. S. I., 1910-1. p. 41.
[6] || Pūrvamīmāṁsā, VI, 6, 18.

Home Page

>
>