|
Contents |
|
Index
|
|
Introduction
|
|
Contents
|
|
List of Plates
|
|
Additions and Corrections
|
|
Images
|
|
Contents |
|
Altekar, A. S
|
Bhattasali, N. K
|
|
Barua, B. M And Chakravarti, Pulin Behari
|
|
Chakravarti, S. N
|
|
Chhabra, B. CH
|
|
Das Gupta
|
|
Desai, P. B
|
|
Gai, G. S
|
|
Garde, M. B
|
|
Ghoshal, R. K
|
|
Gupte, Y. R
|
|
Kedar Nath Sastri
|
|
Khare, G. H
|
|
Krishnamacharlu, C. R
|
|
Konow, Sten
|
|
Lakshminarayan Rao, N
|
|
Majumdar, R. C
|
|
Master, Alfred
|
|
Mirashi, V. V
|
|
Mirashi, V. V., And Gupte, Y. R
|
|
Narasimhaswami, H. K
|
|
Nilakanta Sastri And Venkataramayya, M
|
|
Panchamukhi, R. S
|
|
Pandeya, L. P
|
|
Raghavan, V
|
|
Ramadas, G
|
|
Sircar, Dines Chandra
|
|
Somasekhara Sarma
|
|
Subrahmanya Aiyar
|
|
Vats, Madho Sarup
|
|
Venkataramayya, M
|
|
Venkatasubba Ayyar
|
|
Vaidyanathan, K. S
|
|
Vogel, J. Ph
|
|
Index.- By M. Venkataramayya
|
|
Other
South-Indian Inscriptions
|
|
Volume
1
|
Volume
2
|
|
Volume
3
|
Vol.
4 - 8
|
|
Volume 9
|
Volume 10
|
|
Volume 11
|
Volume 12
|
|
Volume 13
|
Volume
14
|
|
Volume 15
|
Volume 16
|
|
Volume 17
|
Volume 18
|
|
Volume
19
|
Volume
20
|
|
Volume 22 Part 1
|
Volume
22 Part 2
|
|
Volume
23
|
Volume
24 |
|
Volume
26
|
Volume 27 |
|
Tiruvarur
|
Darasuram
|
|
Konerirajapuram
|
Tanjavur |
|
Annual Reports 1935-1944
|
Annual Reports 1945- 1947
|
|
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2
|
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3
|
|
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1
|
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2
|
|
Epigraphica Indica
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 3
|
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 4
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 6
|
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 7
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 8
|
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 27
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 29
|
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 30
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 31
|
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 32
|
Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2
|
|
Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2
|
Vākāṭakas Volume 5
|
|
Early Gupta Inscriptions
|
|
Archaeological
Links
|
|
Archaeological-Survey
of India
|
|
Pudukkottai
|
|
|
EPIGRAPHIA INDICA
BAMHANI PLATES OF PANDAVA KING BHARATABALA ; YEAR 2
Mēkalā as a country. We are familiar with Mēkala-kanyakā[1]. as one of the various names of the
holy river Narmadā (Nerbuda), as well as with Mēkala[2] as the name of a mountain range wherein
is located the soiree of the river.[3] Mēkalā, as referring to a country, is, on the other hand, not
so well known, though it is mentioned as such even in the epics, the Rāmāyaṇa[4] and the Mahābhārata,[5] in association with some of the neighbouring countries, like Daśārṇa, Chēdi, Utkala,
etc. Some of the Purāṇas[6] likewise make mention of it. All these words acquaint us with Mēkala
as a people and also as a country peopled by them. Drawing upon these sources, Dr. B. C. Law
gives us a brief account of the Mēkalas whom he describes as “a small tribe inhabiting the tract
of country comprising the modern Amarakaṇṭaka hills and the surrounding region.”[7] All these
are, however, bare references which it is possible to enliven only by historical data of a more tangible nature, like the record under discussion. Some of the Purāṇas no doubt refer to a line of
seven kings in Mēkalā,[8] who are supposed to have ruled in about the third century A. D., but
that is all. They do not mention the name of a single king. In the later literature, references to
Mēkalā become more scarce. An outstanding example is that of Varāhamihira’s Bṛihatsaṁhitā,[9]
wherein Mēkala is mentioned among the mountains and the peoples in the eastern region.[10]
For our purpose, however, the most valuable, reference is that found in a Vākāṭaka grant
namely in the Bālāghāṭ plates of Pṛithvishēṇa II,[11] which has a very intimate bearing upon the
subject under consideration. This leads us to the question of the history of the ruling house of
[1] Compare Rēvā tu Narmadā Sōmōdbhavā Mēkalakanyakā (Amarakōsha, I, 10, 32) ; and Mēkalakanyā cha Narmadā Rēvā (Abhidhānaratnamālā, III, 52). Mēkalasutā, meaning the same thing, is mentioned in a verse
ascribed to Rājaśēkhara in Bhagaḍatta Jalhaṇa’s Sūktimuktāvalī, as quoted by R. G. Bhandarkar, (above, Vol.
IV, p. 280) ; as also by Sten Konow in his edition of Rājaśēkhara’s Karpūramañjarī, p. 182. The published
edition of the Sūktimuktāvalī (Gaekawad’s Oriental Series, No. LXXVII, p. 47, V. 88), has Mēkhalasutā instead
of Mēkalasutā. This contusion of Mēkala into Mēkhala is noticed also in different recensions of the Rāmāyaṇa,
the Mahābhārata, etc., as pointed out below.
[2] That is Maikal or Maikala.─“Range of hills in the Central Provinces and Central India, lying between
21º 11′ and 22º 40′ N. and 80º 46′ and 81º 46′ E. It is the connecting link between the great hill systems of the
Vindhyas and Sātpurās, forming respectively the northern and southern walls of the Narbadā valley.” Imperial
Gazetteer of India (1908), Vol. XVII, p. 29.
[3]The particular spot where the river is supposed to take its origin is known as Amarakaṇṭka. The village
of that name is within the Rewa State, “situated in 22º 41′ N. and 81º 46′ E. on the easternmost extremity of the
Maikala range.” Ibid., Vol. V, p. 274. Amarakaṇṭaka is one of the most sacred places in India and is highly
glorified as such in the Purāṇas.
[4]Kishkindhā-kāṇḍa, XLI, 9. The reference is to the Nirṇaya-sāgar edition of the Rāmāyaṇa, with Rāma’s
commentary Tilaka, the only complete edition to which I have had access. The relevant portion reads Mēkhalān=Utkalāṁś=ch=aiva Daśārṇa-nagarāṇy=api. In Govindanath Guha’s Laghu-Rāmāyaṇa (3rd edition, Calcutta,
237─Kishkindhyā-kāṇḍa, VII, 17), an abridgement, which evidently follows the Bengal recension, the corresponding reading is Mēkalān=Utkalāṁś=Chēdīn Daśārṇān Kukurān=api, which appears to a much better text. By
the way, the slight difference between the forms Mēkhala and Mēkala is again apparent. A short note on the
Kukuras, another little known people, is to be found in Dr. B. C. Law’s article on Some Ancient Indian Tribes
in the Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, Vol. XXII, 1941, p. 96.
_____________________
[5] The people of Mēkala are counted among those vanquished by Karṇa. For various references to them in
the epic, see S. Sorensen’s Index to the Names in the Mahābhārata. Here again the southern recension gives the
form Mēkhala, as may be seen in P. P. S. Sastri’s edition,─e.g., Vol. VIII (Bhīshma-parvan─ VI), p. 47, v. 39.
[6] E.g., Padmapurāṇa, Ādi-Khaṇḍa VI, 36.─Uttamāś=cha Daśārṇāś=cha Mēkalāś=ch=Ōtkalaiḥ saha. Some
other Purāṇas are cited in the works referred to in the next two notes.
[7]Ancient Indian Tribes, Vol. II, p. 28.
[8]See Pargiter’s Dynasties of the Kali Age, p. 51. According to the account given by Dr. B. C. Law, op. cit.,
‘ the Vishṇupurāṇa refers to ten kings who had Mēkala as their land of birth.’ The late Dr. K. P. Jayaswal has
worked up the Puranic data and attempted a connected history of the Mēkalā rulers in the early centuries of the
Christian era, which is discussed below, pp. 138-9.
[9]Especially in the Kūrma-vibhāga (ch. XIV), 7; but also in V, 39, 73 ; and XVI, 2.
[10]Ind. Ant., Vol. XXII, 1893, pp. 170, 185.
[11] Above, Vol. IX, pp. 267 ff. and plate, text l. 28.
|