The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Altekar, A. S

Bhattasali, N. K

Barua, B. M And Chakravarti, Pulin Behari

Chakravarti, S. N

Chhabra, B. CH

Das Gupta

Desai, P. B

Gai, G. S

Garde, M. B

Ghoshal, R. K

Gupte, Y. R

Kedar Nath Sastri

Khare, G. H

Krishnamacharlu, C. R

Konow, Sten

Lakshminarayan Rao, N

Majumdar, R. C

Master, Alfred

Mirashi, V. V

Mirashi, V. V., And Gupte, Y. R

Narasimhaswami, H. K

Nilakanta Sastri And Venkataramayya, M

Panchamukhi, R. S

Pandeya, L. P

Raghavan, V

Ramadas, G

Sircar, Dines Chandra

Somasekhara Sarma

Subrahmanya Aiyar

Vats, Madho Sarup

Venkataramayya, M

Venkatasubba Ayyar

Vaidyanathan, K. S

Vogel, J. Ph

Index.- By M. Venkataramayya

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

The alphabet is Kannaḍa of the 13th century and agrees with the general formation of the period. The medial ē sign is shown independently above the letter ya in patayē, l. [1]. Attention may be drawn to the cursive form of ma which is used occasionally, e.g., Madhukēśvara, l. 14. A few instances of orthographical peculiarities and faulty spelling may be noticed. Gōkarṇa is written as Gōkaṁrṇna, ll. 16 and 28. The form Chandā-ura of the place-name (l. 25) isnote-worthy. La is written for ḷa in kaligala, l. 19 ; Rādēya is a mistake for Rādhēya l. 20 ; Iṁdhyāṭavī for Viṁdhyāṭavī, l. 78.

The language of ll. 1-12 and 75-80, containing invocation, description of Kāmadēva’s genealogy and imprecation, is Sanskrit ; all the remaining lines are in Old Kannaḍa.

A post-script in late characters of about the 17thcentury is engraved in the space remaining after the end of the main record. It runs from l. 80 to l. 88 and records in modern Kannaḍa, the grant of several privileges to certain Brāhmaṇas for the worship of the god Mahābaḷēśvara, with the alleged authority of the chief Vīra-Kāvadēvarasa of the early record.

>

The object of the record is to register a sarvamānya gift of lands by Kādaṁba-chakravarti Vīra-Kāvadēvarasa to Āhitāgni Mahēśvara-Bhaṭṭa of the Viśvāmitra gōtra and others at the agrahāra village of Mūrūr (ll. 24-68). The gift was made in the presence of the god Mahābaḷēśvara of Gōkarṇa in the Śaka year 1177, the cyclic year being Rākshasa, on Māgha śuddha 15, Guruvāra, on the occasion of a lunar eclipse (ll. 26-28). The details of the date regularly correspond to A.D. 1256, January 13, Thursday.

The record happens to be a royal grant and the donor chief Kāmadēva is described with a long string of epithets and titles (ll. 12-24), some of which are significant. That the chief, notwithstanding his assumption of the high-sounding title of Chakravartin (l. 23), was only a petty ruler is partly disclosed by the epithet Samadhigatapañchamahāśabda (l. 12), indicative of his subordinate status. The epithets, Banavāsipuravarādhīśvara and Jayantī-Madhukēśvaradēva-labdha-varaprasāda, in conjunction with Kādaṁba, prove his connection with the later branches of the Kadamba lineage. The earlier stock of the Kadambas split up subsequently into a number of families that are known to have ruled in the western and southern parts of ancient Karṇāṭaka from the 10th century onwards.[1] The better known of these are the Kadambas of Hānagal,[2] of Goa,[3] of Bayalnāḍ,[4] of Bēlūr.[5] of Bankāpur[6] and of Nāgarakhaṇḍa.[7] But the family to which Kāmadēva of the present record belonged, seems to be different from any of those hitherto known. His genealogy as given in this record (ll. 7-12) consists of the following three names :

Vīra

Taila

Kāmadēva

A chief named Mahāmaṇḍaḷēśvara Kāmadēva, who is called Tailamana-aṅkakāra was a scion of the Hānagal branch of the Kadambas, who governed Banavāsi and other districts.8 The latest date available for him is A.D. 1211.9 This precludes the possibility of identifying him with the Kāmadēva of the present record. Another Kāmadēva, who is almost contemporaneous

_______________________________________

[1] Rice : Mysore and Coorg from inscriptions, p. 27.
[2]Bom. Gaz., Vol. I, pt. II, p. 558.
[3]Ibid., p. 564.
[4]Ep. Carn., Vol. IV, Intro. p. 3.
[5]Ibid., Vol. V, Intro. p. iv.
[6] Above, Vol. XIII, p. 169.
[7]Ep. Carn., Vol. VII, Intro. p. 11.
[8]Bom. Gaz., Vol. I, pt. II. p. 563.
[9]Ep. Carn., Vol. VIII, Sb. 59.

Home Page

>
>