The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Altekar, A. S

Bhattasali, N. K

Barua, B. M And Chakravarti, Pulin Behari

Chakravarti, S. N

Chhabra, B. CH

Das Gupta

Desai, P. B

Gai, G. S

Garde, M. B

Ghoshal, R. K

Gupte, Y. R

Kedar Nath Sastri

Khare, G. H

Krishnamacharlu, C. R

Konow, Sten

Lakshminarayan Rao, N

Majumdar, R. C

Master, Alfred

Mirashi, V. V

Mirashi, V. V., And Gupte, Y. R

Narasimhaswami, H. K

Nilakanta Sastri And Venkataramayya, M

Panchamukhi, R. S

Pandeya, L. P

Raghavan, V

Ramadas, G

Sircar, Dines Chandra

Somasekhara Sarma

Subrahmanya Aiyar

Vats, Madho Sarup

Venkataramayya, M

Venkatasubba Ayyar

Vaidyanathan, K. S

Vogel, J. Ph

Index.- By M. Venkataramayya

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

CHHOTI DEORI STONE INSCRIPTION OF SANKARAGANA

(1 Plate)

V. V. MIRASHI, AMRAOTI

This inscription was first brought to notice by General Sir Alexander Cunningham in his Archæological Survey of India Report for 1883-84. He again referred to it in the next year’s report and published a lithograph of it.2 The inscription was subsequently noticed by Dr. (then Mr.) D. R. Bhandarkar in Mr. Cousens’ Progress Report of the Archæological Survey of Western India for 1903-4, p. 54, and by Rai Bahadur Hiralal in his Inscriptions in the Central Provinces and Berar.3 Though noticed several times, the inscription has defied all attempts at interpretation ; for, Cunningham was told that the language of the inscription was not Sanskrit. Dr. Bhandarkar also has remarked :. ‘ What the language of the inscription is cannot be made out.’ The inscription is edited here for the first time from ink impressions kindly supplied by the Superintendent, Archæological Survey, Central Circle, Patna.

Chhoṭi Deori (Small Deori) is situated on the left bank of the Ken, about 16 miles to the west of Jokāhi, in the Murwārā tahsīl of the Jubbulpur District in the Central Provinces. The village is so called probably to distinguish it from the larger village named Deori which lies about five miles to the west. It is also called Māḍhā Deori on account of a number of small temples (maṭhīs), from thirty to forty in number, which lie buried in dense jungle. According to Cunningham, all these were most probably Śaiva shrines. The pillar on which the present inscription is incised must have also belonged to a Śaiva temple as is indicated by its contents. ‘ The pillar is 7 feet 2 inches high and 1 foot square. The inscription of 11 lines is near the top ; in the middle there are two seated figures, male and female;4 and below there is a standing male figure.’5

>

As stated above, the inscription consists of eleven lines. It covers a space 1′ ½″ broad by 1′ 2″ high. It is in a state of fair preservation. The characters belong to the proto-Nāgarī alphabet, resembling those of the Saugor stone inscription.6 They are very carelessly written. Several groups of aksharas are unnecessarily repeated in ll. 4 and 5 as well as in ll.10 and 11. The marks for the medial vowels and visargaare omitted in many cases. The form of kh in khaṁ[]a-, l.1, likhataṁ, l.9, and likhitaṁ, l.10 is peculiar. It resembles somewhat the conjunct ksha, with

______________

[1] This probably refers to the temple of Śiva where the inscribed panel was apparently put up.
[2] Cunningham, A. S. I. R., Vol. XXI, pp. 100 and 159, plate XXVIII.
[3] Second edition, p. 38.
[4]R. D. Banerji identified these with Śiva and Pāravatī. See his Haihayas of Tripurī, etc., (M. A. S. I.,
No. 23), p. 77.
[5] Cunningham A. S. I. R., Vol. XXI, p. 100. For a photograph of the pillars see R. D. Banerji’s
Haihayas of Tripurī, etc., plate XXVIII.
[6] Above, pp. 163 ff.

Home Page

>
>