The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Altekar, A. S

Bhattasali, N. K

Barua, B. M And Chakravarti, Pulin Behari

Chakravarti, S. N

Chhabra, B. CH

Das Gupta

Desai, P. B

Gai, G. S

Garde, M. B

Ghoshal, R. K

Gupte, Y. R

Kedar Nath Sastri

Khare, G. H

Krishnamacharlu, C. R

Konow, Sten

Lakshminarayan Rao, N

Majumdar, R. C

Master, Alfred

Mirashi, V. V

Mirashi, V. V., And Gupte, Y. R

Narasimhaswami, H. K

Nilakanta Sastri And Venkataramayya, M

Panchamukhi, R. S

Pandeya, L. P

Raghavan, V

Ramadas, G

Sircar, Dines Chandra

Somasekhara Sarma

Subrahmanya Aiyar

Vats, Madho Sarup

Venkataramayya, M

Venkatasubba Ayyar

Vaidyanathan, K. S

Vogel, J. Ph

Index.- By M. Venkataramayya

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

Narasiṁha occurs. The Tamil part of the inscription, if it was intact, might have thrown some light on this problem.[1]

From this association with the Pallavas, we may take that the Tiruvorriyūr temple developed greatly in Pallava times and became a famous centre of Mahāvrata Śaivas. That the lives of one of the minor Śaiva Nāyanārs, Kaliya Nāyanār and of Sundaramūrti Nāyanār, one of the Śaiva saints of the Pallava period, are associated with this temple would also show that the shrine had become famous in the Pallava times.

Our record says that Chaturānana arranged for a special service for the Śaiva at Tiruvorriyūr. The deity meant is evidently the primary one in the central shrine, referred to as Ādhipurīśvara which is but a translation of the Tamil name Orriyūr-Uḍaiyār. The Tamil name orri and its Sanskrit synonym ādhi mean ‘ mortgage’ ; what story in the local purāṇa gave this name to the deity is not known.[2] Nor is it known if it was the central deity that was renamed Nirañjanēśvarattu-Mahādēvar by Nirañjana-guru, for, the subshrines and deities at Tiruvorriyūr are numerous.[3]

>

[1] The names Narasiṁhamaṅgala and Siṁhavishṇuchaturvēdimaṅgalam clearly show the association of the Pallavas with the shrine at Tiruvorriyūr and with its adjacent village, Maṇali. In the 12th canto of the Tiruvorriyārp-Purāṇam, we find an account of a Toṇḍaimān of Kāñchī and what he did for the Tiruvorriyūr temple. The Toṇḍaimān who was engaged in rounding up the chieftains Kuruṁbas, Kurunilamannar, who were harassing the people, has to encounter two of their chieftains, Bāṇa and Ona, in the northern direction, from where they were fighting with the help of Bhairava, the deity of their worship. Unable to stand against these, the Toṇḍaimān sought the help of Vishṇu at Tirupati, which being of no avail against the Bhūta sent by Bhairava, he sought the aid of Śiva at Tiruvorriyūr. With the help of the last mentioned, he could destroy the Kurumbas and in gratitude, Toṇḍaimān erected a regular temple for the Śiva at Tiruvorriyūr with vimāna, prākāra, etc. What follows is interesting : the Toṇḍaimān established 500 Śivaliṅgas and brought from the banks of the Ganges five hundred Brāhmaṇa Mahāvratins. For guarding the temple, he set up an image of a Vīramahākāḷī and in front of it a round stone (vaṭṭappārai in Tamil) having a mantrachakra ; and this Kāḷī is evidently the one on the southern side of the central shrine now going by the name of Vaṭṭapaḷḷi-(a corruption of Vaṭṭṭapārai) Nācchiyār. The Toṇḍaimān then consecrated here seven Kāḷīs and Bhairavas and a figure of Śiva in the form of a teacher of the Mahāvratins. The last is evidently the image referred to as Gauḍēśvara or Gauḷīśvara found behind the shrine or Tyāgarāja, to the west, in the southern prākāra. Therefore Gauḷīśvara or Gauḍēśvara, like the Uttarāpathēśvara at Tiruchcheṅkāṭṭāṅguḍi, refers perhaps to the bringing of the worship and the followers of Mahāvrata from the north. It may be pointed out in this connection that both this Gauḍēśvara image and the image of Bhairava or Kshētrapāla in the northern prākāra appear old and may belong to later Pallava times.

_______________________________________________

[2] The available Tiruvorriyūr-Purāṇam not only does not contain any story to explain this name but says also that Orri in the name refers to the fact that floods subsided at this place. Ādhi in the name is taken as Ādi meaning ‘ primary ’. In canto two (Lingōtpatti-Sarga) the Purāṇa says that the chief deity at Tiruvorriyūr is of the form of a painted plank (chitraphalaka), surrounded by Agni ; the deity is hence called Phalakākāranātha. In a subsequent canto (eight) of the same Purāṇa, the story is told of how the serpent king Vāsuki became one with the deity, and from that arose another name of the deity, Paḍaṁ-pakka-nātha, the Lord with the serpent’s hood attached to His form. A stray verse of Kamban also points to the main deity being of the form of Valmīka or anthill, for he refers to the Kāḷī there as the ‘Goddess by the side of man or earth (valmīka)’, Maṭpakkanāchchiyār. Such Valmīka forms of deity are known in other shrines too like Tiruvārūr and the painted plank referred to in the Purāṇa means a plank placed in front of the Valmīka with some chakra. Instead of giving any detailed articles for the bathing (abhishēka) of the deity, our inscription simply mentions Tirumeyppāchchu or the oil essence of frankincense (sāmpirāṇittailam) which is the usual substance with which a periodical sprinkling in lien of abhishēka is given for Valmīka-mūrtis. However, if Paḍaṁpakkanāyaka is the name of the main deity in the form of a Valmīka, there is a real difficulty in explaining the inscription 232 of 1912 of the Macras Epigraphical Collection found at the basement of the Gauḷīśvara shrine which refers to Paḍaṁpakkanāyaka as a stone-image (śila-mayattirumēni). Perhaps this latter refers to what is called Ādhiliṅgam which is said to be on the north of the Valmīka-mūrti. In a late work (c.1800 A.D.), called Sarvadēvavilāsa, containing descriptions of temples in Madras city and environs, this Gauḷīśvara is referred to as Tryaṁbakēśa ; and the deity of the central shrine is called Valmīkanātha.
[3] We must suppose that what was originally an early Pallava structure was rebuilt by Nirañjana-guru towards the close of the Pallava period, and was again rebuilt by architect Ravi in Rājēndra-Chōḷa’s time. From the numerous and informative inscribed stones in the temple, it would indeed be an interesting work to reconstruct the original plan and subsequent growth and modification of the structure of the Tiruvorriyūr temple.

Home Page

>
>