The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Altekar, A. S

Bhattasali, N. K

Barua, B. M And Chakravarti, Pulin Behari

Chakravarti, S. N

Chhabra, B. CH

Das Gupta

Desai, P. B

Gai, G. S

Garde, M. B

Ghoshal, R. K

Gupte, Y. R

Kedar Nath Sastri

Khare, G. H

Krishnamacharlu, C. R

Konow, Sten

Lakshminarayan Rao, N

Majumdar, R. C

Master, Alfred

Mirashi, V. V

Mirashi, V. V., And Gupte, Y. R

Narasimhaswami, H. K

Nilakanta Sastri And Venkataramayya, M

Panchamukhi, R. S

Pandeya, L. P

Raghavan, V

Ramadas, G

Sircar, Dines Chandra

Somasekhara Sarma

Subrahmanya Aiyar

Vats, Madho Sarup

Venkataramayya, M

Venkatasubba Ayyar

Vaidyanathan, K. S

Vogel, J. Ph

Index.- By M. Venkataramayya

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

SRIRANGAM INSCRIPTION OF KAKATIYA PRATAPARUDRA ; SAKA 1239

rivalry between the two Pāṇḍya brothers and that Sundara-Pāṇḍyas ought the help of the Kākatīya king, while Vīra-Pāṇḍya-resorted to Malayāḷa Tiruvaḍi. The present epigraph therefore is important inasmuch as inscriptional reference to this hostility between the Pāṇḍya brothers has not so far been found. These Pāṇḍya prices are mentioned by the historian Wassaf as the legitimate and illegitimate sons of Kulaśēkhara. Who by preferring the illegitimate Vīra-Pāṇḍya to succeed him drove Sundara-Pāṇḍya to turn a parricide and establish his claim with help from outside. From the date A. D. 1317 of the present record, it may be inferred that Malik Kāfūr’s invasion of the south in 710 H. corresponding to A. D. 1310 was a general campaign for loot, and had no connection with the rivalry for power between the Pāṇḍya princes.

Vīra-Pāṇḍya and Sundara- Pāṇḍya mentioned in our inscription may be identified with the Pāṇḍya kings of the names who bore the title Jaṭāvarman and whose dates of accession were A.D. 1296 and 1303 respectively, Form Wassaf’s statement, their animosity seems to have arisen lately, probably before A. D. 1317, the date of our record. Vīra-Pāṇḍya’s latest regnal year is 47[1] (46+1), corresponding to A.D. 1343, while that of Sundara- Pāṇḍya is 17,[2] carrying his reign to A.D. 1319, i.e. 2 years posterior to the date of our record. It will thus be evident that Vīra-Pāṇḍya ultimately gained his object as the rule of his rival was short.

We shall first take up for consideration the connection of the Pāṇḍyas who were the supreme power in the Tamil land[3] with the Travancore country, known as Malai-nāḍu,[4] Malai-maṇḍalam or Vēṇāḍ. The Pāṇḍya kings who were in power towards the close the 13th and the beginning of the 14th centuries were (1) Māravarman Kulaśēkhara (A.D. 1268-1310), (2) Vikrama-Pāṇḍya (A. D.1283-1296),[5] (3) Vīra-Pāṇḍya (A.D. 1296-1343) and (4) Jaṭāvarman Sundara-Pāṇḍya (A.D. 1303-1319).[6]

>

Māravarman Kulaśēkhara seems to have conquered Malai-nāḍu early in his reign, as some of the records found in the Tirunelveli District give him the titles ‘the conqueror of Malai-nāḍu,[7] Śēranaivenra,[8] Kollam-Koṇḍa’,[9] etc. A Sanskrit inscription from Tirunelvēli10 mentions that he

_______________________________________________


[1] Pudukkottai Inscr., No. 440.
[2] Pandyan Kingdom, p. 214.
[3] According to Muhammadan historians, Ma’har. i.e. the Pāṇḍya country extended from Kulam (i.e. Quilon) to Nilawar (Nellore) nearly 300 pharasangs along the sea coast and the king was called Dewar signifying ‘ the lord of the empire’ (Elliot and Dowson : History of India, Vo. III, p. 32). Marco Polo who visited the coast of Tirunelveli in A.D. 1292 says that Ma’bar is the best of all the Indies and the finest sand noblest province in the world’ The Chinese annals contain a description of an embassy which the Pāṇḍyas sent to the Moghul emperor, Kublai-Khān in A. D. 1286 (Tin. Dist. Gaz., p. 55).

Home Page

>
>